Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in multilingual contexts: A Mixed Methods Case Study

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 20, 30.07.2022

Christina Gkougkoura Magdalini Vitsou Nektaria Palaiologou

Abstract

In recent years, a significant number of students with a multilingual background have attended Greek educational institutions, mainly because of migration and the refugee crisis. In March 2020, due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), Greek educational institutions started organizing emergency remote teaching on online educational platforms. This paper describes a case study (through intervention) conducted in a digital multilingual elementary classroom, that aimed to explore strategies for facilitating remote lesson engagement and establishing inclusive pedagogy under emergency situations. The main aim of this study was to explore to what extent task-based language teaching (TBLT) activities grounded on the migrant students’ needs analysis and supported by computer-assisted language learning (CALL) features contribute to active lesson participation during emergencies and their effect on migrant students’ social inclusion in a formal educational context. Results established the most critical factors required for differentiated multilingual distance education. This is an original research work on how diversity and inclusion in emergency remote teaching may be achieved.

Keywords

Multilingual education, language appropriate practices, language-diverse classroom, emergency remote teaching (ERT), social inclusion, students with migrant backgrounds.

References

• Aggeli, A. L. (2017). Distance teaching / learning Greek as a second / foreign language: the contribution of video. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 9(3Α), 120-128.
• Aguliera, E., & Nightengale-Lee, B. (2020). Emergency remote teaching across urban and rural contexts: perspectives on educational equity. Information and Learning Sciences. 10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0100.
• Aukerman, M. (2007). A culpable CALP: Rethinking the conversational/academic language proficiency distinction in early literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 626-635.
• Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Routledge. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing.
• Chappelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge Applied linguistics. New York.–2001.
• Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617-641.
• Council of Europe (n.d.). The CEFR Levels. COUNCIL OF EUROPE. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). California Association for Bilingual Education. DEPPS—APS (2003). Government Newspaper. INTERACTIVE TEXTBOOKS. http://ebooks.edu.gr/new/ps.php
• Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpiński, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent international datasets (No. JRC121071). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
• Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209–224.
• Ethnos (Apr 23, 2020). Donation of 8,400 tablets and laptops to students and teachers. ETHNOS. https://www.ethnos.gr/ellada/101713_dorea-8400-tamplet-kai-laptop-se-mathites-kai-ekpaideytikoys
• Fakoulas, S. (2020). Learning Management Systems: Τhe case of utilization of four Learning Management Systems in primary educations [Master’s thesis, Aegean University]. HELLANICUS http://hdl.handle.net/11610/20971.
• González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525-549.
• González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Towards technology-mediated TBLT. Technology-Mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks, 6, 1–22.
• Guo, K., Bussey, F., & Adachi, C. (2020). Digital learning across cultures: an account of activity theory. Intercultural Education, 1-15.
• Helsper, W. (2002). Teacher professionalism as an antinomic structure of action. Biographie und Profession, 1, 64-85.
• Helsper, W., Böhme, J., Kramer, R. T., & Lingkost, A. (2013). School culture and school myth: grammar schools between elitist education and higher elementary schools in the process of transformation. Rekonstruktionen zur Schulkultur I (Vol. 13). Springer-Verlag.
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSEReview. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning?fbclid=IwAR06enKBAIRpgkNA62QEEnOmjNztxrxdrjvuLD5pMzIUi8iBkAYhOMDABOM.
• Irvine Unified School District (2020). Emergency distance learning plan. IUSD https://iusd.org/emergency-distance-learning-plan.
• Jeon, I. J., & Hahn, J. W. (2006). Exploring EFL teachers' perceptions of task-based language teaching: A case study of Korean secondary school classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8(1), 123-143.
• Lionarakis, A. (2011). Distance and conventional training: convergent or divergent forces?. In PARALLEL TEXTS for the Thematic Unit "Open and Distance Education", EKP65. HOU.
• Lee, T. S., Gardner, D., & Lau, K. (2020). The effects of L2 motivational strategies: within and beyond the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 451-465.
• Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
• Manousou, E. (2004). Distance education applications in primary education. In 1st Panhellenic Two-Day Conference with International Participation on: Lifelong and Distance Education in the Information Society. University of Crete.
• Mantel, C. (2020). Being a teacher with a so-called ‘immigrant background’: challenges of dealing with social boundaries. Intercultural Education, 31(2), 173-189. Miminou, A., & Spanaka, A. (2016). Distance education primary and secondary schools and programs: A literature review. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 7 (2A).
• Niari, M., Samaras, C., Koutsoukos, V., Lionarakis, A., & Verikios, V. (2017). Distance collaborative learning in technical vocational education. The case of vehicle control remotely. Open Education: the magazine for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 13(1), 54-64.
• Okumura, S. (2020). Design and implementation of a telecollaboration project for primary school students to trigger intercultural understanding. Intercultural Education, 31(4), 377-389, DOI: 10.1080/14675986.2020.17525
• Palaiologou, N. (2009). Needs for developing culturally oriented supportive learning with the aid of information and communication technologies, Pedagogy, culture and society. (1468-1366), 17(2), p.189.
• Papadela, C. V., Koutsoumba, M., & Mavroidis, H. (2020). Video as a mean for learning in distance pre-school polymorphic education: a proposed model for its assessment. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 10 (1A), 62-75.
• Papanikolaou, K., & Manousou, E. (2019). Complementary distance education for Primary School Students. An Action Research on lesson compensation occasionally absent from the school class students. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 8(1), 184-201.
• Portera, A. (2020). Has multiculturalism failed? Let's start the era of interculturalism for facing diversity issues. Intercultural Education, 31(4), 390-406. Pozidis, P., Manousou, E., & Koutsoumpa, M. (2015). Cooperative learning in the framework of supplementary environmental distant learning in the network of primary schools of Corfu. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 8(1Α).
• Psallidas, V., & Manousou, E. (2016). The utilization of web 2.0 tools in the supplementary distance learning in Secondary Education. Case study: The design and organization course of Biology in the third class of High School in Sustainable Development Education program. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 6(1Α).
• Ruan, J., & Medwell, J. (2020). Using social networking technology to develop intercultural communicative competence: a case of GCSE Mandarin. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(4), 362-392.
• Sampson, R. J., & Yoshida, R. (2021). L2 feelings through interaction in a Japanese-English online chat exchange. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 15(2), 131-142.
• Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (p. 112–133). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609664.008
• Sobre, M. S. (2017). Developing the critical intercultural classspace: theoretical implications and pragmatic applications of critical intercultural communication pedagogy. Intercultural Education, 28(1), 39-59. 10.1080/14675986.2017.1288984
• Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (2010). Deconstructing tasks and technology. Task-based language learning and teaching with technology, 1-16.
• Tour, E., Gindidis, M., & Newton, A. (2021). Learning digital literacies through experiential digital storytelling in an EAL context: an exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 26-41.
• Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51-67.
• Wakil, K., Abdulfaraj, A., Sadula, A., Tofiq, D., & Nawzad, L. (2019). Performance of distance learning compared with face to face learning. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(1), 1-8.
• Yi, Y., & Jang, J. (2020). Envisioning possibilities amid the COVID‐19 pandemic: Implications from English language teaching in South Korea. TESOL Journal, 11(3).