The same, but different? Learning activities, perceived learning success, and social support during the practical term of teacher education in times of COVID-19

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 108 - 132, 30.07.2022

Katharina Neuber Kerstin Göbel

Abstract

The practical phases of teacher education programs are of high relevance for pre-service teachers and their professional development. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting changes in schools might have affected pre-service teachers’ learning experiences during the long-term internships of initial teacher education programs in various ways. This article focuses on pre-service teachers’ experiences during their practical term during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will address three questions: first, how did pre-service teachers experience different kinds of learning activities in school (e.g., the delivery of and reflection on teaching); second, how did they perceive social support and their learning success associated with the implementation of learning activities in different areas of teaching; and third, which types of learning activities and social support were predictive of their perception of learning success? To this end, we will present findings from a cross-sectional survey which was conducted in the academic year 2020/21. A total of 164 pre-service teachers from different universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, participated in the online survey after having completed their practical term. The results of the study illustrate heterogeneous experiences concerning the preparation and implementation of remote teaching scenarios during the internship. Despite changes in schools due to the pandemic, pre-service teachers perceived a high level of social support and learning success during their practical term. Own teaching experiences and social support from mentors have proved to be relevant predictors for the perception of learning success.

Keywords

COVID-19, practical terms during teacher education, learning experiences, online survey

References

• Allen, J., & Wright, Elizabeth, S. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 136–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1-3540602.2013.848568.
• Almazova, N., Krylova, E., Rubtsova, A., & Odinokaya, M. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Russian Higher Education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ Perspective. Educ. Sci., 10(12), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120368.
• Arnold, K. H., Gröschner, A., & Hascher, T. (2014). Pedagogical field experiences in teacher education: Introduction to the research area. In K. H. Arnold, A. Gröschner, & T. Hascher (Eds.), Schulpraktika in der Lehrerbildung / Pedagogical field experiences in teacher education. Theoretische Grundlagen, Konzeptionen, Prozesse und Effekte / Theoretical foundations, programmes, processes, and effects (pp. 11-28). Waxmann.
• Bach, A. (2015). Das Praxissemester in der Lehrerinnen-und Lehrerbildung. Ergebnisse einer Evaluationsstudie zum Praxissemester an der Europa-Universität Flensburg. [The practical semester in teacher education. Results of an evaluation study on the practical semester at the European University of Flensburg]. Zentrum für Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. https://www.uni-flensburg.de/file-admin/content/zentren/zfl/dokumente/presse/2015-bach-evaluationsbericht-praxis-semester-online-end.pdf.
• Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://online-library.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbe2.191.
• Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers (pp. 25–48). Waxmann. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2.
• Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a Good Practicum Placement: Student Teacher Perceptions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81-98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/234782-94.
• Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Understanding the Development of Teachers’ Professional Competencies as Personally, Situationally and Socially Determined. In D. J. Clandini, & J. Husu (Eds.), International Handbook on Research on Teacher Education (pp. 783–802). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402042.n45.
• Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194.
• Blume, F., Schmidt, A. Kramer, A. C., Schmiedek, F., & Neubauer, A. B. (2021). Homeschooling during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the role of students’ trait self-regulation and task attributes of daily learning tasks for students’ daily self-regulation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24, 367–391. DOI: 10.1007/s11618-021-01011-w.
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033008003.
• Caires, S., Almeida, L., & Vieira, D. (2012). Becoming a teacher: student teachers’ experiences and perceptions about teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 163-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643395.
• Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184.pr-oc.php/0/forschung-und-lehre_9-2020.pdf.