Elektrokoagülasyon Prosesi Kullanılarak Mezbaha Atıksularının Arıtımı Üzerine Ortam Parametrelerinin Etkisi

Yıl 2020, , 140 - 147, 31.12.2020

Mehtap Tanyol , Servet Tevkur

https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.793904

Öz

Mevcut çalışmada, mezbaha atıksuyunun arıtımı üzerine elektrokoagülasyon prosesinin etkinliği kesikli bir reaktör kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Akım yoğunluğu (5-20 mA m-2), başlangıç pH’ı (3-10) ve elektrotlar arası mesafe (4-16 mm) gibi çeşitli parametrelerin etkisi optimum elektrokoagülasyon koşulunu belirlemek için incelenmiştir. Paralel bağlanmış monopolar demir elektrotlar tüm deneyler için kullanılmıştır. Deneylerin performansı temel olarak kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (KOİ) giderimi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. 15 mA m-2 akım yoğunluğu, doğal pH (7.47) ve 16 mm elektrotlar arası mesafe optimum koşullar olarak seçilmiştir. Bu koşullar altında %90.63’lük KOİ giderim verimi elde edilmiştir. Sistemin işletme maliyeti, enerji ve elektrot tüketimi dikkate alınarak hesaplanmış ve 9.15 TL kg-1 KOİ-1 olarak bulunmuştur.

Destekleyen Kurum

Munzur Üniversitesi

Proje Numarası

YLMUB017-08

Effect of Medium Parameters on Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater Using Electrocoagulation Process

Öz

In the present study, the efficiency of the electrocoagulation process on the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater was investigated using a batch reactor. The effect of several parameters such as current density (5-20 mA m-2), initial pH (3-10), and distance between electrodes (4-16 mm) was investigated to determine the optimum electrocoagulation condition. Parallel-connected monopolar iron electrodes were used for all experiments. The performance of the experiments was mainly evaluated using the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. The optimum conditions were selected as 15 mA m-2 current density, natural pH (7.47), and 16 mm distance between electrodes. Under these conditions a COD removal efficiency of 90.63% was achieved. The operating cost of the process was calculated taking into account the energy and electrode consumption and found to be 9.15 TL kg-1 COD-1.

Anahtar Kelimeler

demir elektrot, elektrokoagülasyon, mezbaha atıksuları

Proje Numarası

YLMUB017-08

Kaynakça

• Alfonso-Muniozguren, P., Cotillas, S., Boaventura Rui A.R., C. Moreira F., Lee, J., J.P. Vilar, V., 2020. Single and combined electrochemical oxidation driven processes for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270:121858.
• APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA.
• Atashzaban, Z., Seidmohammadi, A., Nematollahi, D., Azarian, G., Shayesteh, O.H., Rahmani, A.R., 2016. The efficiency of electrocoagulation and electroflotation processes for removal of polyvinyl acetate from synthetic effluent, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 3(2):e7469.
• Bayar, S., Yıldız, Y.Ş., Yılmaz, A.E., İrdemez, Ş., 2011. The effect of stirring speed and current density on removal efficiency of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater by electrocoagulation method. Desalination, 280:103-107.
• Bayramoglu, M., Kobya, M., Eyvaz, M., Senturk, E., 2006. Technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 51:404-408.
• Bener, S., Bulca, Ö., Palas, B., Tekin, G., Atalay, S., Ersöz, G., 2019. Electrocoagulation process for the treatment of real textile wastewater: Effect of operative conditions on the organic carbon removal and kinetic study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 129:47-54.
• Canizares, P., Martinez, F., Rodrigo, M.A., Jimenez, C., Saez, C., Lobato, J., 2008. Modelling of wastewater electrocoagulation processes Part II: Application to dye-polluted wastewaters and oil-in-water emulsions. Separation and Purification Technology, 60:147–154.
• Eryuruk, K., Tezcan Un, U., Ogutveren, U.B., 2018. Electrochemical treatment of wastewaters from poultry slaughtering and processing by using iron electrodes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 1089-1095.
• Fajardo, A.S., Rodrigues, R.F., Martins, R.C., Castro, L.M., Quinta-Ferreira, R.M., 2015. Phenolic wastewaters treatment by electrocoagulation process using Zn anode. Chemical Engineering Journal, 275:331-341.
• Ozturk, D., Yilmaz, A.E., 2019, Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater with the electrochemical oxidation process: Role of operating parameters on treatment efficiency and energy consumption. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 31:100834.
• Palahouane, B., Drouiche, N., Aoud, S., Bensadok, K., 2015. Cost-effective electrocoagulation process for the remediation of fluoride from pretreated photovoltaic wastewater. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 22:127-131.
• Priya, M., Jeyanthi, J., 2019. Removal of COD, oil and grease from automobile wash water effluent using electrocoagulation technique. Microchemical Journal 150:104070.
• Rajakumar, R., Meenambal, T., Saravanan, P.M., Ananthanarayanan, P., 2012. Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor packed with pleated polyvinyl chloride rings. Bioresource Technology, 103(1):116-122.
• Safwat M.S., 2020. Treatment of real printing wastewater using electrocoagulation process with titanium and zinc electrodes. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 34:101137.
• Su Kirliliği ve Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, 2004. 31.12.2004 tarih ve 25867 sayılı Resmi Gazete.
• Tevkur, S., 2019. Mezbaha atıksularının elektrokoagülasyon prosesi kullanılarak arıtılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Munzur Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tunceli.