Devletin Rolüne İlişkin Tercihlerin Belirleyicileri: Ülkeler Arası Karşılaştırma ve Türkiye

Year 2018, , 1 - 26, 30.07.2018

Savaş Çevik

https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.327879

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Çalışma ülke düzeyinde ve Türkiye için bireysel
düzeyde vatandaşların devlet-piyasa karşıtlığında devletin rolüne ilişkin
tercih ve taleplerinin belirleyicilerini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada
devlete ve yeniden dağılıma ilişkin tutumlardaki farklılıkların ülkelerin
ekonomik ve sosyal kurumları arasındaki farklılıklarla ve bireysel düzeyde
sosyal, ekonomik ve psikolojik faktörlerle açıklanabileceğini önerilmektedir. Çalışmada
kullanılan veriler Dünya Değerler Araştırması (WVS) ve Avrupa Değerler Araştırması
(EVS)’ndan elde edilmiştir. Ülkeler arasında karşılaştırma zaman boyutunda
devletin rolü lehine eğilimin birçok ülke grubunda arttığını göstermektedir.
Bir diğer önemli olgu devletin rolüne ilişkin tutumların ülkelerin gelir
seviyesi ile de ilişkili olduğudur. Yeniden dağılım yanlısı tutum kişi başı
gelirle pozitif, kamu mülkiyeti, devlet sorumluluğu yanlısı görüşlerin negatif
korelasyonlu olduğu bulunmuştur. Türkiye’ye ilişkin analiz, cinsiyet ve yaşın
yanı sıra, gelir seviyesinin, sübjektif refahın, genelleştirilmiş güvenin,
devlete ve özel sektöre güvenin, politik görüşün ve dindarlığın yeniden dağılım
ve kamu mülkiyeti yanlılığını açıklamakta önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

yeniden dağılım, siyasal tercihler, refah devleti, sosyal güven, devletin rolü, sosyal tercihler

Determinants of Preferences on the Role of the State: Cross-Country Comparisons and Turkey Case

Abstract

The study aims at to examine the preferences and demands of citizens on the role of the government in the extent of dichotomy of government-market. This task is fulfilled through at the country level analyses and at the individual level for Turkey. The study proposes that the citizens’ preferences and attitudes toward welfare state and redistribution could be explained by the differences between the countries’ economic and social institutions at the country level, and by social, economic, political and psychological factors at the individual level. The data employed in the study has been obtained from the dataset collected by the World Value Survey (WVS) and European Values Survey (EVS). The comparison at country level indicates that pro-government preferences increase in the most of the countries by the time. Another fact is that the average of individualistic/collectivist attitudes is correlated with the per capita income level of countries. Attitudes favor of redistribution are positively correlated with per capita GDP, while attitudes favor public ownership and government responsibility are negatively correlated with it. Finally, we analyzed the individual-level determinants for Turkey data. Results revealed the evidences on significance of income level, subjective wellbeing (happiness and life satisfaction), generalized trust, confidence on government and private sector firms, political views and religiousness in order to determine the preferences on redistribution and ownership, along with demographic characteristics such as gender, age.

Keywords

redistribution, political preferences, welfare state, generalized trust, the role of the state, social preferences

References

• Alesina, Alberto F. ve Paola Giuliano (2009).“Preferences for Redistribution”, NBER Working Paper 14825.
• Bergh, Andreas ve Christian Bjørnskov (2013), “Trust, Welfare States and Income Equality: What Causes What?”,IFN Working Paper No. 994
• Bjørnskov, Christian. (2007). “Determinants of Generalized Trust: A Cross-Country Comparison”. Public Choice 130: 1-21.
• Blekesaune, Morten, Quadagno, Jill (2003). “Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies.A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations”.European Sociological Review 19: 415-427.
• Corneo, Giacomo, Hans Peter Grüner (2002). “Individual Preferences for Political Redistribution”, Journal of Public Economics 83: 83–107.
• Dallinger, Ursula (2010). “Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-national Differences?”,Journal of European Social Policy 20: 333–349.
• Feldman, Stanley, Marco Steenbergen (2001). “The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare”.American Journal of Political Science 45:658-677.
• Fong, Christina (2001). “Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution”, Journal of Public Economics 82: 225-246.
• Jaeger, M.M. (2013).“The Effect of Macroeconomic and Social Conditions on the Demand for Redistribution: A Pseudo Panel Approach”, Journal of European Social Policy 23: 149-163.
• Jakobsen, T.G. (2011). Welfare Attitudes and Social Expenditure: Do Regimes Shape Public Opinion? Social Indicators Research 101: 323-340.
• Koster, Ferry (2009), “Welfare State Attitudes and Economic Integration in the EU, 1992-2002: A Multilevel Investigation across 24 Countries”, mimeo <www.ferrykoster.nl> (10.01.2017)
• Pitlik, HansveLudekKouba (2013), “The Interrelation of Informal Institutions and Governance Quality in Shaping Welfare State Attitudes”, For Europe Working Papers, No: 38, <http://www.foreurope.eu>
• Roosma, Femke, John Gelissen, Wim van Oorschot, W. (2013). “The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study”, Social Indicators Research, 113(1): 235–255
• Stegmüller, Daniel, Peer Scheepers, Sigrid Roßteuscher, Eelke de Jong. (2011). “Support for Redistribution in Western Europe. Assessing the Role of Religion”, European Sociological Review. 28(4): 482-497
• Svallfors, Stefan (2012). “Government Quality, Egalitarianism, and Attitudes to Taxes and Social Spending: A European Comparison”, European Political Science Review 4: 1-18.