Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 43 - 51, 08.07.2020

Abstract

References

  • Aktas, V., Sahin, D. and Aydin, O. (2005). Hostile Intolerance for Aggressive and Non-Aggressive Children Analysis of Loading Bias in Terms of Gender, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 20, Number: 55, ss.43-57.
  • Aydın A. and Akgün S. (2014). Reactive-Proactive Aggression, Anger and Narcissism Relationship in Adolescence, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 29, Issue73, pp.44-56.
  • Beyazyürek M. and Şatır T.T. (2000) Substance Use Disorders, Istanbul: Balıklı Rum Hospital Foundation, Psychiatry World ss.50-56.
  • Dodge K. A., Malone P. S., Lansford J. E. et al. (2015). Hostile attributional and social behavior in global context, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 112, no. 30, pp.9310-9315.
  • Gençtanırım, D. - Ergene T. (2014). Development of Risky Behavior Scale: Validity and Journal of Academic Social Studies, No: 25-1, p. 125-138.
  • Güven H. (2011). Adopting Adolescent Intent among Adolescents who are Criminal-ized with Crime Analysis of bias and some bias characteristics, Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Adana: Unpublished Master's Thesis.
  • Please Note (1): The results of this study reflect the personal views of the participants, not the views of the Turkish Armed Forces.
  • Please Note (2): This study is derived from a part of the thesis titled Enemy Procure-ment Bias in Adolescents Who Have Used and Substance Adopted to the Guidance and Counseling Center.

HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 43 - 51, 08.07.2020

Abstract

The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Behavioral Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Behavioral Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs. The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Hostile Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Hostile Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs. Recommendations are given according to the results of the research.

References

  • Aktas, V., Sahin, D. and Aydin, O. (2005). Hostile Intolerance for Aggressive and Non-Aggressive Children Analysis of Loading Bias in Terms of Gender, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 20, Number: 55, ss.43-57.
  • Aydın A. and Akgün S. (2014). Reactive-Proactive Aggression, Anger and Narcissism Relationship in Adolescence, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 29, Issue73, pp.44-56.
  • Beyazyürek M. and Şatır T.T. (2000) Substance Use Disorders, Istanbul: Balıklı Rum Hospital Foundation, Psychiatry World ss.50-56.
  • Dodge K. A., Malone P. S., Lansford J. E. et al. (2015). Hostile attributional and social behavior in global context, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 112, no. 30, pp.9310-9315.
  • Gençtanırım, D. - Ergene T. (2014). Development of Risky Behavior Scale: Validity and Journal of Academic Social Studies, No: 25-1, p. 125-138.
  • Güven H. (2011). Adopting Adolescent Intent among Adolescents who are Criminal-ized with Crime Analysis of bias and some bias characteristics, Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Adana: Unpublished Master's Thesis.
  • Please Note (1): The results of this study reflect the personal views of the participants, not the views of the Turkish Armed Forces.
  • Please Note (2): This study is derived from a part of the thesis titled Enemy Procure-ment Bias in Adolescents Who Have Used and Substance Adopted to the Guidance and Counseling Center.
There are 8 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tuba Keskın This is me

Nurten Sargın This is me

Publication Date July 8, 2020
Submission Date July 17, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Keskın, T., & Sargın, N. (2020). HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. International Journal of Quality in Education, 3(1), 43-51.
AMA Keskın T, Sargın N. HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. IJQE. July 2020;3(1):43-51.
Chicago Keskın, Tuba, and Nurten Sargın. “HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER”. International Journal of Quality in Education 3, no. 1 (July 2020): 43-51.
EndNote Keskın T, Sargın N (July 1, 2020) HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. International Journal of Quality in Education 3 1 43–51.
IEEE T. Keskın and N. Sargın, “HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER”, IJQE, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2020.
ISNAD Keskın, Tuba - Sargın, Nurten. “HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER”. International Journal of Quality in Education 3/1 (July 2020), 43-51.
JAMA Keskın T, Sargın N. HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. IJQE. 2020;3:43–51.
MLA Keskın, Tuba and Nurten Sargın. “HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER”. International Journal of Quality in Education, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, pp. 43-51.
Vancouver Keskın T, Sargın N. HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. IJQE. 2020;3(1):43-51.