Research Article

DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA

Volume: 2 Number: 2 December 10, 2018
  • Ohene Agyemang Opoku *
EN

DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA

Abstract

The third wave of democratization which hit the world led to a spontaneous wave of democratization in most African states in the early 1990s. The reinstatement of democratic governance brought hope and relief to most citizens. This is as a result of the promulgation and entrenching of human rights clauses in respective countries constitutions. There is now a clarion call for democracy to be consolidated. It is significant to mention that Ghana and Kenya have practiced democracy over two decades. The process of consolidating democracy has become necessary owing to pockets and mass violence in Ghanaian and Kenyan elections respectively. The use of minimalists’ conceptualization of measuring democracy based on elections must be discarded and give way to the maximalists approach. Dahl refers to this as the polyarchy of democracy. The study is placed within the liberal democratic theory by Dahl. The central question to ask is what roles have the judiciary played in consolidating the Ghanaian and Kenyan democracy from its inception? This is important to address this fundamental question in the new democracies like Ghana and Kenya because the more independent the judiciary and other democratic institutions, the higher the rate of democratic sustenance is guaranteed. This research is significant because the courts have been used as dispute resolution arena. It aims at investigating the role that courts have played to consolidate democracy. In 2012 Ghana’s opposition party leader went to the state’s Supreme Court to seek redress about electoral irregularities and malpractices. While the 2017 Kenyan elections dispute and irregularities were settled in the court. The study uses quantitative and qualitative data as its primary data source. Data from the Afro barometer survey is used. And published court rulings are used. Qualitative data via interviews of judges and political Parties officials.

Keywords

References

  1. (KHRC), K. H. (1997). Kayas of Deprivation, Keyas of Blood: Violence, Ethnicity and the State in Coastal Kenya. Nairobi: KHRC.
  2. Anthony, B. H. (2007). The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  3. Azu, M. (2015). Lessons from Ghana and Kenya: Why Presidential Elec-tion Petition Usually Fail. AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW JOURNAL.
  4. Boafo-Arthur, K. (2007). A decade of liberalism in perspective. In K. Boafo-Arthur, Ghana One decade of the liberal state (pp. 2-3). 7 Cynthia Street, London n1 9jf, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA in 2007: published by Zed Books Ltd.
  5. Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories od Democracy. London and New York: Routledge Tailor and Francis Group.
  6. Dahl, A. R. (1998). On Democracy. USA: Yale University Press.
  7. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven and London: Yale Uni-versity Press.
  8. Dahl, R. (1998). On Democracy. USA: Yale University Press Publishing.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ohene Agyemang Opoku * This is me

Publication Date

December 10, 2018

Submission Date

June 1, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 1, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 2

APA
Opoku, O. A. (2018). DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, 2(2), 105-128. https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ
AMA
1.Opoku OA. DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA. IJSHS. 2018;2(2):105-128. https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ
Chicago
Opoku, Ohene Agyemang. 2018. “DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 2 (2): 105-28. https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ.
EndNote
Opoku OA (December 1, 2018) DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 2 2 105–128.
IEEE
[1]O. A. Opoku, “DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA”, IJSHS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 105–128, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ
ISNAD
Opoku, Ohene Agyemang. “DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 2/2 (December 1, 2018): 105-128. https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ.
JAMA
1.Opoku OA. DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA. IJSHS. 2018;2:105–128.
MLA
Opoku, Ohene Agyemang. “DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 105-28, https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ.
Vancouver
1.Ohene Agyemang Opoku. DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN AFRICA BEYOND ELECTIONS: A STUDY ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS- THE JUDICIARY IN GHANA AND KENYA. IJSHS [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;2(2):105-28. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA48AB35WJ