Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 115 - 154, 31.12.2022

Abstract

The current study examined the psychometric features of the Turkish translation of the Mate Retention InventoryShort Form (MRI-SF) in Turkey. For this study, 286 participants were recruited with 78 participants (27.3%) being men and 208 participants (72.7%) women between the ages of 18 and 34 (M = 22.1, SD = 2.79). Participants were requested to complete a demographic form, the Turkish version of the Mate Retention InventoryShort Form (MRI-SF), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. Consistent with the earlier studies, the 19 mate retention tactics constituted a twocomponent structure. Sex differences in the adoption of mate retention strategies were investigated in order to assess the construct validity of the Turkish version of the MRI-SF. Additionally, the relationship between mate retention strategies and sexual jealousy and self-esteem was examined to determine the construct validity. The findings were in accordance with the previous studies and the analyses revealed that the Turkish MRI-SF is a valid measurement tool.

References

  • Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. Encyclo-pedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
  • Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 24
  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303.
  • Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Psycho-metric evaluation and cultural correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917695267. *
  • Bale, C., & Archer, J. (2013). Self-perceived attractiveness, romantic desira-bility and self-esteem: A mating sociometer perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 68–84
  • Barnett, O. W., Martinez, T. E., and Bluestein, B. (1995). Jealousy and ro-mantic attachment in martially violent and non-violent men. Journal of Interperson-al Violence, 10, 473-486.
  • Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805-819.
  • Brewer, G., & Riley, C. (2009). Height, relationship satisfaction, jealousy, and mate retention. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 147470490900700310.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988a). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tac-tics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988b). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.
  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolution-ary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press
  • Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Let-ters, 23(4), 23-29.
  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(2), 346.
  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differ-ences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological science, 3(4), 251-256.
  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate reten-tion inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322-334.
  • Buunk, B., and Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. In Perlman, D., and Duck, S. W. (Eds.) Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynam-ics and Deterioration (pp. 123-147). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
  • Carducci, B. J. (2020). Evolutionary Theory and Personality Correlates of Mate Selection. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 149-153.
  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (No. Sirsi) i9780871507679). Boston: Willard Grant Press.
  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jeal-ousy. Ethology and sociobiology, 3(1), 11-27.
  • Davis, A. C., Desrochers, J., DiFilippo, A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost‐inflicting and benefit‐provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596-610.
  • De Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Per-sonality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of personality, 79(3), 563-586.
  • DeKay, W. T., & Buss, D. M. (1992). Human nature, individual differences, and the importance of context: Perspectives from evolutionary psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 184-189.
  • Eisinga, R., TeGrotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642 Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen dis-placement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention deci-sions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and in-dividual differences, 28(3), 501-513.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Holden, C. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., ... & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband's esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 147470491401200311.
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (authorized edition).
  • Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Gracanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 5, 277–296.
  • Kernis, M. H. (2013). Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of cur-rent perspectives. psychology press.
  • Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they say?. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220.
  • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychol-ogy, 9, 221–229.
  • Leary, M. R. (2003). Commentary on self-esteem as an interpersonal moni-tor: The sociometer hypothesis (1995). Psychological Inquiry, 14, 270–274
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of person-ality and social psychology, 68(3), 518.
  • Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36-40.
  • McKibbin, W. F., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Schipper, L. D., Starratt, V. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 231–241.
  • Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009). Mate value of ro-mantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 46(2), 135-139.
  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differ-ences, 47(3), 214-218.
  • Murat, A. K. A. (2012). Türkiye’de diller ve etnik gruplar. Uluslararası Tü-rkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 1(1), 293-297.
  • Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. C. (2019). Mate retention strategies, self-esteem, mate value and facial attractiveness disparity in Brazil and in the UK. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 45(6), 461-472.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psycho-logical Science, 1(1), 4-12.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 415-425.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 447-463.
  • Shrestha, K., Rees, D. W., Rix, K. J. B., Hore, B. D., & Faragher, E. B. (1985). Sexual jealousy in alcoholics. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 72(3), 283-290.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2012). Discrepancies be-tween explicit and implicit self-esteem: Implications for mate retention strategies and perceived infidelity. The Journal of social psychology, 152(6), 670-686.
Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 115 - 154, 31.12.2022

Abstract

References

  • Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. Encyclo-pedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
  • Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 24
  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303.
  • Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Psycho-metric evaluation and cultural correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917695267. *
  • Bale, C., & Archer, J. (2013). Self-perceived attractiveness, romantic desira-bility and self-esteem: A mating sociometer perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 68–84
  • Barnett, O. W., Martinez, T. E., and Bluestein, B. (1995). Jealousy and ro-mantic attachment in martially violent and non-violent men. Journal of Interperson-al Violence, 10, 473-486.
  • Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805-819.
  • Brewer, G., & Riley, C. (2009). Height, relationship satisfaction, jealousy, and mate retention. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 147470490900700310.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988a). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tac-tics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988b). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.
  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolution-ary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press
  • Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Let-ters, 23(4), 23-29.
  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(2), 346.
  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differ-ences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological science, 3(4), 251-256.
  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate reten-tion inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322-334.
  • Buunk, B., and Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. In Perlman, D., and Duck, S. W. (Eds.) Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynam-ics and Deterioration (pp. 123-147). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
  • Carducci, B. J. (2020). Evolutionary Theory and Personality Correlates of Mate Selection. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 149-153.
  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (No. Sirsi) i9780871507679). Boston: Willard Grant Press.
  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jeal-ousy. Ethology and sociobiology, 3(1), 11-27.
  • Davis, A. C., Desrochers, J., DiFilippo, A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost‐inflicting and benefit‐provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596-610.
  • De Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Per-sonality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of personality, 79(3), 563-586.
  • DeKay, W. T., & Buss, D. M. (1992). Human nature, individual differences, and the importance of context: Perspectives from evolutionary psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 184-189.
  • Eisinga, R., TeGrotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642 Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen dis-placement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention deci-sions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and in-dividual differences, 28(3), 501-513.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Holden, C. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., ... & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband's esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 147470491401200311.
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (authorized edition).
  • Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Gracanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 5, 277–296.
  • Kernis, M. H. (2013). Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of cur-rent perspectives. psychology press.
  • Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they say?. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220.
  • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychol-ogy, 9, 221–229.
  • Leary, M. R. (2003). Commentary on self-esteem as an interpersonal moni-tor: The sociometer hypothesis (1995). Psychological Inquiry, 14, 270–274
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of person-ality and social psychology, 68(3), 518.
  • Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36-40.
  • McKibbin, W. F., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Schipper, L. D., Starratt, V. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 231–241.
  • Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009). Mate value of ro-mantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 46(2), 135-139.
  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differ-ences, 47(3), 214-218.
  • Murat, A. K. A. (2012). Türkiye’de diller ve etnik gruplar. Uluslararası Tü-rkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 1(1), 293-297.
  • Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. C. (2019). Mate retention strategies, self-esteem, mate value and facial attractiveness disparity in Brazil and in the UK. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 45(6), 461-472.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psycho-logical Science, 1(1), 4-12.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 415-425.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 447-463.
  • Shrestha, K., Rees, D. W., Rix, K. J. B., Hore, B. D., & Faragher, E. B. (1985). Sexual jealousy in alcoholics. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 72(3), 283-290.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2012). Discrepancies be-tween explicit and implicit self-esteem: Implications for mate retention strategies and perceived infidelity. The Journal of social psychology, 152(6), 670-686.
Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 115 - 154, 31.12.2022

Abstract

References

  • Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. Encyclo-pedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
  • Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 24
  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303.
  • Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Psycho-metric evaluation and cultural correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917695267. *
  • Bale, C., & Archer, J. (2013). Self-perceived attractiveness, romantic desira-bility and self-esteem: A mating sociometer perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 68–84
  • Barnett, O. W., Martinez, T. E., and Bluestein, B. (1995). Jealousy and ro-mantic attachment in martially violent and non-violent men. Journal of Interperson-al Violence, 10, 473-486.
  • Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805-819.
  • Brewer, G., & Riley, C. (2009). Height, relationship satisfaction, jealousy, and mate retention. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 147470490900700310.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988a). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tac-tics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.
  • Buss, D. M. (1988b). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.
  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolution-ary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: Free Press
  • Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Let-ters, 23(4), 23-29.
  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(2), 346.
  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differ-ences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological science, 3(4), 251-256.
  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate reten-tion inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322-334.
  • Buunk, B., and Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. In Perlman, D., and Duck, S. W. (Eds.) Intimate Relationships: Development, Dynam-ics and Deterioration (pp. 123-147). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications
  • Carducci, B. J. (2020). Evolutionary Theory and Personality Correlates of Mate Selection. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 149-153.
  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (No. Sirsi) i9780871507679). Boston: Willard Grant Press.
  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jeal-ousy. Ethology and sociobiology, 3(1), 11-27.
  • Davis, A. C., Desrochers, J., DiFilippo, A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost‐inflicting and benefit‐provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596-610.
  • De Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Per-sonality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of personality, 79(3), 563-586.
  • DeKay, W. T., & Buss, D. M. (1992). Human nature, individual differences, and the importance of context: Perspectives from evolutionary psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 184-189.
  • Eisinga, R., TeGrotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642 Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen dis-placement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 749–763.
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention deci-sions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and in-dividual differences, 28(3), 501-513.
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Holden, C. J., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Miner, E. J., Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., ... & Buss, D. M. (2014). Husband's esteem predicts his mate retention tactics. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 147470491401200311.
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (authorized edition).
  • Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Gracanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 5, 277–296.
  • Kernis, M. H. (2013). Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of cur-rent perspectives. psychology press.
  • Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they say?. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 202-220.
  • Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychol-ogy, 9, 221–229.
  • Leary, M. R. (2003). Commentary on self-esteem as an interpersonal moni-tor: The sociometer hypothesis (1995). Psychological Inquiry, 14, 270–274
  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of person-ality and social psychology, 68(3), 518.
  • Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36-40.
  • McKibbin, W. F., Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Schipper, L. D., Starratt, V. G., & Stewart-Williams, S. (2007). Why do men insult their intimate partners? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 231–241.
  • Miner, E. J., Shackelford, T. K., & Starratt, V. G. (2009). Mate value of ro-mantic partners predicts men’s partner-directed verbal insults. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 46(2), 135-139.
  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differ-ences, 47(3), 214-218.
  • Murat, A. K. A. (2012). Türkiye’de diller ve etnik gruplar. Uluslararası Tü-rkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 1(1), 293-297.
  • Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. C. (2019). Mate retention strategies, self-esteem, mate value and facial attractiveness disparity in Brazil and in the UK. Journal of sex & marital therapy, 45(6), 461-472.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psycho-logical Science, 1(1), 4-12.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 415-425.
  • Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men's mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 447-463.
  • Shrestha, K., Rees, D. W., Rix, K. J. B., Hore, B. D., & Faragher, E. B. (1985). Sexual jealousy in alcoholics. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 72(3), 283-290.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Fulton, J. J., & McLemore, C. (2012). Discrepancies be-tween explicit and implicit self-esteem: Implications for mate retention strategies and perceived infidelity. The Journal of social psychology, 152(6), 670-686.
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ryan Macey Wise This is me

Senanur Karkılı This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Wise, R. M., & Karkılı, S. (2022). ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, 6(3), 115-154.
AMA Wise RM, Karkılı S. ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM. IJSHS. December 2022;6(3):115-154.
Chicago Wise, Ryan Macey, and Senanur Karkılı. “ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 6, no. 3 (December 2022): 115-54.
EndNote Wise RM, Karkılı S (December 1, 2022) ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 6 3 115–154.
IEEE R. M. Wise and S. Karkılı, “ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM”, IJSHS, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 115–154, 2022.
ISNAD Wise, Ryan Macey - Karkılı, Senanur. “ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences 6/3 (December 2022), 115-154.
JAMA Wise RM, Karkılı S. ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM. IJSHS. 2022;6:115–154.
MLA Wise, Ryan Macey and Senanur Karkılı. “ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM”. International Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, 2022, pp. 115-54.
Vancouver Wise RM, Karkılı S. ASSESSING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE MATE RETENTION INVENTORY - SHORT FORM. IJSHS. 2022;6(3):115-54.