Review Article

Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process

Volume: 17 Number: 2 August 31, 2024
EN

Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process

Abstract

The sudden change in the existing order due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused chaos and confusion. The uncertainty and anxiety caused by chaos and confusion necessitated the reconstruction of the social order in accordance with the pandemic conditions. Therefore, we should consider the sudden change of the social order and its reconstruction when evaluating the COVID-19 pandemic in a sociological context. Since these two processes are ethnomethodologically significant, the aim of the study is to interpret the social changes that occurred during the COVID-19 process within the framework of ethnomethodology theory. Various examples provide an ethnomethodological evaluation of Türkiye’s reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent re-establishment of social order. This article analyzes, using ethnomethodology concepts, the irrational reactions of people in a life without rules due to the sudden disruption of the existing order by COVID-19, the helplessness of social institutions in the face of the pandemic, and the reconstruction of social order with rational rules to lessen anxiety and chaos.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No financial support was received from any person or institution for the study.

Ethical Statement

The author declares that this article complies with ethical standards and rules.

References

  1. Adak, M. M., & Koç, M. (2022). COVID-19 pandemi döneminde uygulanan uzaktan eğitim sürecinde bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenlerinin deneyimlerinin incelenmesi [Examining information technology teachers’ experiences in the distance education process during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.1038646
  2. Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. (2021). Covid-19 döneminde uzaktan çalışma rehberi [Remote Work Guide During the Covid-19 Period]. Retrieved July 04, 2024, from https://www.csgb.gov.tr/media/68338/kiplas-covid-19-doneminde-uzaktan-calisma-rehberi-26022021.pdf
  3. Akın, I. (2017). Davranışsal finans açısından yatırımcıların kararlarının incelenmesi [Behavioral finance in terms of the evaluation of investor decisions]. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(15), 11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.23929/javs.446
  4. Aktan, C.C. (2020). Davranışsal politik iktisat. L-T Akademia.
  5. Al-Ghuraibi, M. A., & Aldossry, T. M. (2022). Social Stigma as an outcome of the cultural repercussions toward COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2053270
  6. Allan, K. (2006). Contemporary social and sociological theory. Sage Publications.
  7. Arber, S., & Meadows, R. (2020, March 23). Class inequalities in health and the Coronavirus: A cruel irony? The Blog of the Department of Sociology at the University of Surrey. https://blogs.surrey.ac.uk/sociology/2020/03/23/class-inequalities-in-health-and-the-coronavirus-a-cruel-irony
  8. Aristeidou, M., & Cross, S. (2021). Disrupted distance learning: The impact of Covid-19 on study habits of distance learning university students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 36(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1973400

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sociology of Health, Social Theory

Journal Section

Review Article

Early Pub Date

August 30, 2024

Publication Date

August 31, 2024

Submission Date

February 14, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 25, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 17 Number: 2

APA
Sağlık, C. (2024). Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 17(2), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1436759
AMA
1.Sağlık C. Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process. ijsi. 2024;17(2):425-448. doi:10.37093/ijsi.1436759
Chicago
Sağlık, Coşkun. 2024. “Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process”. International Journal of Social Inquiry 17 (2): 425-48. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1436759.
EndNote
Sağlık C (August 1, 2024) Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process. International Journal of Social Inquiry 17 2 425–448.
IEEE
[1]C. Sağlık, “Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process”, ijsi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 425–448, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.37093/ijsi.1436759.
ISNAD
Sağlık, Coşkun. “Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process”. International Journal of Social Inquiry 17/2 (August 1, 2024): 425-448. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1436759.
JAMA
1.Sağlık C. Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process. ijsi. 2024;17:425–448.
MLA
Sağlık, Coşkun. “Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process”. International Journal of Social Inquiry, vol. 17, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 425-48, doi:10.37093/ijsi.1436759.
Vancouver
1.Coşkun Sağlık. Ethnomethodological Evaluation of the COVID-19 Process. ijsi. 2024 Aug. 1;17(2):425-48. doi:10.37093/ijsi.1436759

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26134 26133     Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------