An Exploratory Study of Female Juvenile Offenders: Harris County, Texas, 1993-2004

Abstract

Female offenders are the fastest growing population in the criminal justice system. The purpose of this study is to determine the month or months that most female juvenile offenses occur in Harris County (the largest county in the State of Texas), identify the average age of the offender, investigate the possibility of a relationship between ethnicity and referrals for offense of females identified in this population, evaluate the rate of increase/decrease of female juvenile referrals to the Harris County Juvenile Probation Department annually and over an 11-year period. The researchers obtained system information (offense date, age, date of birth and race) for 18,790 female juvenile offenders that were referred to the Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (HCJPD) from 1993-2004. The results indicated that during the 11-year time frame, the profile of juvenile offender became older (average age being 10 in 1993 and 14.5 by 2004) and more likely to be a minority (Latina or African American). Also, the month in which female juvenile offenders were most frequently referred to HCJD was December, followed by March and April. An evaluation of female juveniles referred between 1993 – 2004 to HCJPD compared to the Harris County female juvenile population showed a disproportionate representation of African American females entering the juvenile justice system for the first time. Finally, there was a significant increase in referrals seen from 1999 (878 referrals) to 2000 (3,408 referrals). Factors that may have contributed to these findings included: sexual, emotional, and physical abuse; mental illness, societal trends′, and juvenile laws and regulations.

Keywords

• Juvenile
• Female
• Offender
• Harris County
• Probation Department

References

1. Acoca, L. (1999). Investigating in girls: A 21st century strategy. Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 3
2. Acoca, L. & Dedel, K. (1998). No place to hide: Understanding and meeting the needs of girls in the California juvenile justice system. San Franscisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3. Alaniz, M.L., Parker, R.N., Gallegos, A., Cartmill, R.S. (1998). Immigrants and violence: the importance of context. Hispanic J. Behav. Sci.. 20(2): In press.
4. Amaro, H., Blake, S., Schwartz, P.,&Flinchbaugh, L. (2001). Developing theory-based Substance abuse prevention programs for young adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(3), 256-293.
5. American Bar Association and National Bar Association. (2001). Justice by gender: The lack of appropriate prevention, diversion and treatment alternatives for girls in the justice system. Washington, DC: Author.
6. Barnow, S., Schuckit, M. A., Lucht, M., Ulrich, J., & Freyberger, H. J. (2002). The importance of a positive family history of alcoholism, parental rejection and emotional warmth, behavioral problems and peer substance use for alcohol problems in teenagers: A path analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 305-316.
7. Belenko, S., Sprott, J. B., & Petersen, C. (2004). Drug and Alcohol Involvement Among Minority and Female Juvenile Offenders: Treatment and Policy Issues. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(1), 3-36.
8. Blumstein A. 1995. Youth violence, guns, the illicit drug industry. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86(1): 10-36.

9. Birkett, J. (1999). Juvenile justice reforms- county & state. Journal of the DuPage County Bar Association, http://www.ncmhjj.com/pdfs/publications/GAINS_Adol_girls.pdf. Retrieved January 21, 2008 from
10. Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). What about girls? Hidden victims of Congressional juvenile crime control. Unpublished paper, Women’s Studies Program: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
11. Chesney-Lind, M. & Sheldon, R. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
12. Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). What about the girls? Delinquency programming as if gender mattered. Corrections Today, 63(1), 38-45.
13. Davis, K., Schoen, C., Greenberg, L., Desroches, C., & Abrams, M. (released September 1997). The Commonwealth Fund Survey of the Health of Adolescent Girls. New York: Commonwealth Fund (publication forthcoming).
14. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1999). Crimes in the United States:1999. Washington DC: Author.
15. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2000). Crime in the United States, 1991. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
16. Freshman, A., &Leinwand, C. (2001). The implications of female risk factors for substance abuse prevention in adolescent girls. In J. D. Atwood (Ed.), Family systems/family therapy: Applications for clinical practice (pp. 29-51). New York: Haworth.
17. Girls Incorporated. (1996). Prevention and parity: girls in juvenile justice report. Girls Incorporated National Resource Center & the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Indianapolis, IN.
18. Goldstein P.J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: a tripartite conceptual framework. J. Drug Issues 15:493-506.
19. Graves, D. & Mirsky, L. (2007). American Psychological Association report challenges school zero tolerance policies and recommends restorative justice. Washington, DC: Restorative Practice EForum.
20. Greene, Peters, & Associates. (1998). Guiding principles for promising female programming: An inventory of best practices. Retrieved from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/pubs/principles/contents.html.
21. Hunsicker, L. (2007). Mental Illness Among Juvenile Offenders: Identification and Treatment. Corrections Today, 69(5), 60.
22. Kataoka, S., Zima, B., Dupre, D., Moreno, K., Yang, X., & McCracken, J. (2001). Mental health problems and service use among female juvenile offenders: Their relationship to criminal history. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(5), 555.
23. Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. (1998). Never too early, never too late: Risk factors and successful interventions for serious and violent juvenile offenders. Prevention 7(1), 7
24. Loper, A. B. (2000). Female juvenile delinquency: Risk factors & promising interventions. Juvenile Justice Fact Sheet. Charlottesville, VA: Institute of Law, Psychiatry & Public Policy, University of Virginia.
25. Mcabe, K. M., Lansing, A. E., Garland, A. & Hough, R. (2002). Gender differences in psychopathology, functional impairment and familial risk factors among adjudicated delinquents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,47, 860
26. Neihart (1998) (Neihart M 1998 Creative ability, Gifted children, Education, and mental illness) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2003). Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement. OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Retrieved /19/08, from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov./ojstatbb/corrections/qa08209.asp?qaDate=2003 database.
27. Otto, R.K., Greenstein, J.J., Johnson, M.K., & Friedman, R.M. (1992). Prevalence of mental disorders among youth in the juvenile justice system. In J.J. Cocozza (Ed.), Responding to the Mental Health Needs of Youth in Juvenile Justice System. Seattle, WA: The National Coalition for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Justice System.
28. Parker R.N. (1995). Bringing “booze” back in: the relationship between alcohol and Homicide. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(1): 3-38.
29. Parker, R. N., & Auerhahn, K. (1998). Alcohol, Drugs, and Violence. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 24, 291-311.
30. Parker, R.N, & Rebhun, L.A. 1995. Alcohol and Homicide: A Deadly Combination of Two American Traditions. Albany: State Univ. NY Press. Health and Juvenile Justice.
31. Poe-Yamagata, E. & Butts, J. (1996). Female offenders in the juvenile justice system: statistics summary. NCJ 160941. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington D.C.:U.S. Department of Justice.
32. Poe-Yamagata, E., & Jones, M. (2000). And justice for some: Differential treatment of minority youth in the justice system. Washington, DC: Building Blocks for Youth.
33. Prescott, L. (1997). Adolescent Girls with Co-Occurring Disorders in the Juvenile Justice System. Retrieved January 21, 2008 from http:// www.prainc.com.
34. Sherman, F. T. (2005). Pathway to juvenile detention reform:Detention reform and girls challenges and solutions. Pathways. Baltimore,MD:The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
35. Skiba, R, Reynolds, C., Graham, S., Sheras, P., Conoley, J. & Vazquez, E. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Skowyra, K. & Cocozza, J. (2000) Blueprint for change: A comprehensive model for the identification and treatment of youth with mental health needs in contact with the juvenile justice system. Washington, D.C.: OJJDP and the National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.
37. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2000). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
38. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
39. Stock, J. L., Bell, M. A., Boyer, D. K., & Connell, F. A. (1997). Adolescent pregnancy and sexual risk-taking among sexually abused girls. Family Planning Perspective, 29(5), 200-203.
40. Stone, S. S. (1998). Changing Nature of Juvenile Offenders, conference presentation, http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/conference/track1.html.
41. Teplin. L. (2001). Mental health: An emergency issue. Paper presented at the American Correctional Health Services Association Multidisciplinary Training Conference, Atlanta, GA.
42. Timmons-Mitchell, J., Brown, C., Schultz, S.C., Webster, S.E., Underwood, L.A., Semple, W.E., (1997). Final Report: Results of a Three Year Collaborative Effort to Assess the Mental Health Needs of Youth in the Juvenile Justice System in Ohio. (Unpublished Report). Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Youth Services.
43. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). United States Census 2000. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html.