THE ANALYSIS OF POST COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM FROM RICHARD ROSECRANCE’S SYSTEM MODEL PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

In the modern international relations starting with Westphalian Peace Treaties, the different changes occured in the structure main features and actor number of international system in different period. Particularly, in the early of Post Westphalian era, we have witnessed the period that in the international system USA has been hegemonic in the military, politic and economic sense. In this phase in the international system several dynamic faced involving new risks, threats and several transformations occured correspondingly changing security perception. Similarly, different practices occured in the meaning of diplomacy in this phase. At this study, act on role decision making mechanism in the internal politics of the political elites and managers in the Richard Rosecrance’s international system definition has touched upon the structure and characteristics of the international system in the post-Cold War era. In addition, the role of states’s internal economic policy on policies in the international system has been examined. It was analyzed what sort change and transformation in the structure and features of international system has experienced with the participation of other actors in the leadership of USA and how this situation was reflected in 2000s.

Keywords

• International System,Politicial Elites and Manager,The US Hegemony,Multilateral International Structure,Richard Rosecrance

References

1. Arı, Tayyar (2013). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
2. Bromley, Simon (2011). “The Limits to Balancing”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24 (2), 129-134.
3. Canbolat, İbrahim (2012). Uluslararası İlişkilerde Türkiye Savaş ve Barış Arasında Dünya. Bursa: Aktüel Yayınları.
4. Çeçen, Anıl (2004). “Avrasya’da Dünya Hegemonya Kavgası”. 2023 Dergisi, 42, 12-28.
5. Çiftçi, Kemal (2009). “Soğuk Savaş Sonrasında ABD: Rızaya Dayalı Hegemonyadan İmparatorluk Düzenine”. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5 (10), 203-219.
6. Ikenberry, G. John (2001). “American Grand Strategy in Age of Terror”. Survival, 43 (4), 9-34.
7. Jones, Walter S. (1997). The Logic of International Relations, New York: Longman.
8. Kantarcı, Şenol (2012). “Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Uluslararası Sistem: Yeni Sürecin Adı ‘Koalisyonlar Dönemi mi?”. Güvenlik Stratejileri, 8 (16), 47-85.

9. Knutsen, Torbjon L. (2006). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisi Tarihi. Mehmet Özay (Çev.). İstanbul: Açılım Yayınları.
10. Miller, Benjamin (1994). “Explaining the Emergence of Great Power Concerts”. Review of International Studies, 20 (4), 327-348.
11. Nye, Joseph S. (Summer, 2004). “Soft Power and American Foreign Policy”. Political Science Quarterly, 119 (2), 255-270.
12. Özdal, Barış; Karaca, R. Kutay (2014). Diplomasi Tarihi II. Bursa: Dora Yayınevi.
13. Primakov, Yevgeni (2010). Rusyasız Dünya. (çev.) Aijan Esenkanova İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
14. Rasmussen, Greg (2001). “Great Power Concerts in Historical Perspectives”. The New Great Power Coalition Toward a World Concert of Nations, Richard Rosecrance (Edit.). Maryland: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, 203-221
15. Rosecrance, Richard (1963). Action and Reaction in World Politics. Boston: Little Brown.
16. Rosecrance, Richard (1976). America as an Ordinary Country: US Foreign Policy and the Future. London: Cornell University Press.
17. Rosecrance, Richard (Autumn 1981). “International Theory Revisited”. International Organization, 35 (4), 691-713.
18. Rosecrance, Richard (1986). The Rise of Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.
19. Rosecrone, Richard (1990). America’s Economic Resurgence: A Bold New Strategy. Canada: Harper Collins.
20. Rosecrance, Richard (Spring, 1992). “A New Concert of Powers”. Foreign Affairs, 71 (2), 64-82.
21. Rosecrance, Richard (1996). “The Rise of the Virtual State”. Foreign Affairs, 75 (4), 45-61.
22. Rosecrance, Richard (2002). “International Security and the Virtual State: States and Firms in World Politics”. Review of International Studies, 28 (3), 443-455.
23. Rosecrance, Richard (May/June 2010). “Bigger Is Better: The Case for a Transatlantic Economic Union”. Foreign Affairs, 89 (3), 42-50.
24. Rosecrance, Richard (27 Ağustos 2013). “Want World Domination? Size Matters”, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/opinion/sunday/want-world-domination-size-matters.html
25. Saraçlı, Murat (2015). “Rusya Federasyonu’nun Yakın Çevre Politikasında Dış Rusların Yeri ve Kırım Meselesi”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları Dergisi, 45, 69-88.
26. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk (2014). Uluslararası Politika ve Dış Politika Analizi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
27. Uzer, Umut (2013). “21. Yüzyılda Tek Kutupluluk Tartışmaları”. Bilge Strateji Dergisi, 5 (8), 69-93.
28. Waltz Kenneth; Quester, George H. (1982). Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı ve Dünya Siyasal Sistemi. (çev.) Ersin Onulduran, Ankara: AÜSBF Yayınları.
29. Yılmaz, Muzaffer Ercan (2013). Savaş ve Uluslararası Sistem. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.