Determining Factors Hindering University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis from the Perspective of Academicians in the Context of Entrepreneurial Science Paradigm

Year 2011, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 185 - 213, 30.05.2016

Kurtuluş Kaymaz Kadir Yasin Eryıgıt

Abstract

Collaboration with industry is critical for academia to create scientific knowledge and obtain industrial data. In turn, collaboration with universities is crucial for organizations in joint, scientific-based research projects in order to develop solutions for production-sourced problems. Both parties need to be in contact via collaborations with the aim of developing new data, methods and technology. To strengthen mutual collaborations and add value, much more attention from both sides should be paid to this subject. Within this context, there should be greater interest from industrialists and academicians, bureaucracy and government regulations should be revised to stimulate the joint projects, field studies should receive more attention in universities, two-way communication should be built between industrialists and academicians, university-industry collaboration centers should be more effective, and finally, mutual publicity should be increased. In this paper, university-industry collaboration is evaluated from the viewpoint of academics. The main finding in the study is that the academics perceive negative factors in the collaboration process.

Keywords

University-industry collaboration, entrepreneurial science, research alliances, knowledge transfer, collaboration centers, logit model

References

• Akıllı, M. (2009). Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliğinde Bir Başarı Örneği: Türk Makine Sektöründe Bir Kalite Markasının Yaratılması, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Arslan, R., Soba, M., Doğruer, S. & Işık, S. (2009). Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği Sorunları, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U. & Woerter, M. (2008). University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer In Switzerland: What University Scientists Think About Co- operation With Private Enterprises, Research Policy, 37, 1865-1883.
• Asheim, B.T., Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters, Research Policy, 34, 1173-1190.
• Ataman, G. (2001). İşletme Yönetimi: Temel Kavramlar ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Türkmen Kitapevi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Azagra-Caro, J.M. (2007). What Type Of Faculty Member Interacts With What Type Of Firm? Some Reasons For The Delocalisation Of University-Industry Interaction, Technovation, 27, 704-715.
• Baba, Y., Shichijo, N. & Sedita, S.R. (2009). How Do Collaborations With Universities Affect Firms’ Performance? The Role of “Pasteur Scientists” In The Advanced Materials Field, Research Policy, 38, 756-764.
• Bekkers, R., Freitas, I.M.B. (2008). Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels Between Universities and Industry: To What Degree Do Sectors Also Matter? Research Policy, , 1837-1853.
• Bercovitz, J.E.L. & Feldman, M.P. (2007). Fishing Upstream: Firm Innovation Strategy and University Research Alliances, Research Policy, 36, 930-948.
• Bjerregaard, T. (2009). Universities-Industry Collaboration Strategies: A Micro-Level Perspective, European Journal Of Innovation Management, 12, 2, 161-176.
• Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K.S., Stoto, M.A. & Wise, D. (1986). University Industry Research Relationships in Biotechnology: Implications for the University, Science, 232, 4756 1361-1366.
• Boardman, P.C. (2009). Government Centrality To University-Industry Interactions: University Research Centers and The Industry Involvement Of Academic Researchers, Research Policy, 38, 1505-1516.
• Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and Technical Human Capital: An Alternative Model For Research Evaluation, International Journal Of Technology Management, 22, 7/8, 636-655.
• Bozkurt, V. & Aytaç, S. (1996). 2000'li Yıllara Doğru Türkiye'nin Önde Gelen Sorunlarına Yaklaşımlar: Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği ve Araştırma Geliştirme, İstanbul: Simge Ofis.
• Bruneel, J., D’Este, P. & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating The Factors That Diminish The Barriers To University-Industry Collaboration, Research Policy, 39, 858-868.
• Butcher, J., Jeffrey, P. (2005). The Use of Bibliometric Indicators To Explore Industry Academia Collaboration Trends Over Time In The Field Of Membrane Use Of Water Treatment, Technovation, 25, 1273-1280.
• Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
• Carayol, N., (2003). Objectives, Agreements and Matching In Science-Industry Collaborations: Reassembling the Pieces of Puzzle, Research Policy, 32, 887-908.
• Cohen W.M., Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, 128-152.
• Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R. & Walsh J.P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence Of Public Research On Industrial R&D, Management Science, 48, 1, 1-23.
• Crespo, M. & Dridi, H. (2007). Itensification Of University-Industry Relationhips and Its Impact On Academic Research, High Education, 54, 61-84.
• Çengel, K. (2009). Gaziantep Organize Sanayi Bölgesindeki Firmaların Ar-Ge ve Teknoparklara Yaklaşımı Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi.
• Debackere, K. & Veugelers, R. (2005). The Role Of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations In Improving Industry Science Links, Research Policy, 34, 321-342.
• Eom, B. & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants Of Industry-Academy Linkages And, Their Impact On Firm Performance: The Case Of Korea As A Latecomer In Knowlegde Industrialization, Research Policy, 39, 625-639.
• Erdoğan, S. (2009). Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği İçin Ar-Ge/Ür-ge Finansman Merkezi Modeli, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Norms Of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effets Of The New University-Industry Linkages, Research Policy, 27, 823-833.
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B.R.C. (2000). The Future Of The University and The University Of The Future: Evolution Of Ivory Tower To Entrepreneurial Paradigm, Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
• Fontana, R., Geuna, A. & Matt, M. (2006). Factors Affecting University-Industry R&D Projects: The Importance Of Searching, Secreening And Signalling, Research Policy, 35, 323.
• Geoghean, W. & Pontikakis, D. (2008). From Ivory Tower To Factory Flower? How Universities Are Changing To Meet The Needs Of Industry, Science and Public Policy, , 7, 462-474.
• Göker, A. (2008). Türkiye’de Bilim ve Teknoloji Politika Tasarımlarında Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Adana.
• Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J.C. (2005) Industry Funding and University Professors Research Performance, Research Policy, 34, 932-950.
• Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N. & Vonortas, N.S. (2000). Research Partnerships, Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
• Hagedoorn, J. & Achakenraad, J. (1994). The Effect of Strategic Technology Alliances On Company Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 15,4, 291-309.
• Halis, M. & Bayrak, S. (2003). Öğretim Elemanları ve Sanayici Açısından Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi, Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 64- 85
• Kaymaz, K., Çiftçioğlu, B.A. & Acar, D. (2010). Bursa’ da Faaliyet Gösteren İşletmelerin Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Algıları ve Yönetim Organizasyon Konuları Kapsamında Bir İnceleme, 18.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Adana.
• Kazu, I. Y. & Turhan, M. (2003). Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliğine İlişkin İşletme Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri (Elazığ İli Örneği). Verimlilik Dergisi. Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayını. 2003/4, 41-58.
• Kızıltaş, M. (2009). Üniversitelerde Teknoloji Transfer Ofisleri ve Bir Uygulama Örneği: Metutech-TTO, Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Koçel, T. (1998). İşletme Yöneticiliği, 6. Baskı, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
• Kökocak, K. (2006). Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği, Lider Matbaacılık, Çorum.
• Lee, Y.S. (2000). The Sustainability Of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Emprical Assessment, Journal Of Technology Transfer, 25, 111-133.
• Mead, N., Beckman, K., Lawrence, J., O’Mary, G., Parish, C., Unpingco, P. & Walker, H. (1999). Industry/University Collaborations: Different Perspectives Heighten Mutual Opportunities, The Journal Of Systems and Software, 49, 155-162.
• Maraşlı, H., Akova, O. (2009). Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği Bağlamında İşbirliği Modelleri, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Mohnen, P., Hoareau, C. (2003). What Types Of Enterprise Forges Close Links With Universities and Government Labs? Evidence From CIS 2, Managerial And Decision Economics, 24, 2/3, 133-145.
• Odabaşı, Y., Helvacıoğlu, Ş., İnsel, M., Helvacıoğlu, İ.H. (2009), Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliğinde Örnek Bir Model, Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir.
• Philbin, S. (2008). Process Model For University-Industry Research Collaboration, European Journal Of Innovation Management, 11, 4, 488-521.
• Plewna, C. & Quester, P. (2007). Key Drivers Of University-Industry Relationships: The Role Of Organizational Compatibility and Personal Experience, Journal Of Services Marketing, 21, 5, 370-382.
• Ryan, L. (2007). Developing a Qualitative Understanding Of University-Corporate Education Partnerships, Management Decision, 45, 2, 153-160.
• Santoro, M.D. & Chakrabarti, A.K. (2002). Firm Size and Technology Centrality In Industry-University Interactions, Research Policy, 31, 1163-1180.
• Shane, S. (2004). Encouraging University Entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh Dole Act on University Patenting in the United States, Journal Of Business Venturing, , 127-151.
• Shartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M.M. & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge Interactions Between Universities and Industry In Austria: Sectorel Patterns and Determinants, Research Policy, 31, 303-328.
• Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E. & Link, A.N. (2004). Toward A MODEL Of Effective Transfer Of Scientific Knowledge From Academicians To Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence From The Commercialization Of University Technologies, Journal Of Engineering And Technology Management, 21, 115-142.
• Stahler, G.J., & Tash, W.R. (1994). Centers and Institutes In The Research University: Issues, Problems, and Prospects, The Journal Of Higher Education, 65, 5, 540-554.
• Tether, B.S. & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond Industry-University Links: Sourcing Knowledge For Innovation From Consultants, Private Research Organizations And The Public, Research Policy, 37, 1079-1095.
• Turk-Bicakci, L. & Brint, S. (2005). University-Industry Collaboration: Patterns Of Growth For Low- and Middle-Level Performers, Higher Education, 49, ½, 61-89.
• Yıldız, R. (2007). Erciyes Üniversitesi Araştırma Merkezlerinin İşlevselliği, Üniversitelerdeki Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezlerinin İşlevselliği: Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliğinin Yeniden Yapılandırılmasının Gereklilikleri, Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık.
• Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A. & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-Range Universities Linkages With Industry: Knowledge Types and The Role of Intermadiaries, Research Policy, 37, 1205-1223.
• Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. & Sapienza, H.J. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation In Young Technology-Based Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 6/7, 587-613.