The Impact of Social Policy on Social Trust: Decommodification and Stratification According To Esping-Andersen’s Welfare Regime Typology

Year 2010, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 3 - 28, 30.05.2016

Larysa Tamılına

Abstract

The main interest of this research consists of introducing an outcome spectrum in studying the welfare state-trust nexus. The latter can be obtained by decomposing Esping-Andersen’s welfare regime typology and directly evaluating the effects of decommodification and stratification on trust indexes. The expectation is formulated on the premise of the traditional crowding-out hypothesis which assumes that as the welfare state develops, trust levels decline. The hypothesis is checked based on a cross-sectional analysis for a set of 18 OECD countries while using a multi-level modeling as the main research method. The results obtained permit to reject the crowding-out hypothesis and infer that welfare states may enhance trust formation.

Keywords

trust, welfare state, decommodification, stratification, crowding-out

References

• BANNINK, D. & HOOGENBOOM, M. (2007), “Hidden Changes: Desegregation of Welfare State Regimes for Greater Insight into Welfare State Change”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 17, n° 1, 19 : 32.
• BJONSKOV, C. (2005), “The Determinants of Trust”. Working paper
• BODE, I. (2006), “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 16, n° 4, 346 : 359.
• BONOLI, G. (2001), “Classifying Welfare States: a Two-Dimensional Approach”, Journal of Social Policies, vol. 26, 351 : 372.
• DELHEY, J. & NEWTON, K. (2003), “Who trusts? The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies” European Societies, vol. 5, n° 2, 93 : 137.
• EDLUND, J. (2006), “Trust in the Capability of the Welfare State and General Welfare State Support: Sweden 1997-2002”, Acta Sociologica, vol. 49, n° 4, 365 : 389.
• ESPING – ANDERSEN, G. (1990), The Three Words of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity press.
• EVANS, P. (1996), “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy” World Development, vol. 24, n° 6, 1119 : 1132.
• FOX, J. (1996), “How Does Civil Society Thicken? The Political Construction of Social Capital in Rural Mexico” World Development, vol. 24, n° 6, 1089 : 1103.
• FUKUYAMA, F. (2000), Social Capital and Civil Society. Washington: IMF Working Paper, 00/74.
• HELLER, P. (1996), “Social Capital as a Product of Class Mobilization and State Intervention: Industrial Workers in Kerala, India”, World Developemnt, vol. 24, n° 6, 48: 84.
• HERREROS, F. & CRIADO, H. (2008), “The State and the Development of Social Trust”, International Political Science Review, vol. 29, n° 1, 53 : 71.
• KNACK, S. & ZAK, P. (2001), “Building Trust: Public Policy, Interpersonal Trust, and Economic Development”. Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 12, 134 : 151.
• KUMLIN, S. & ROTHDTEIN, B. (2007), “Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare State Institutions”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 38, n° 4, 339 : 365.
• MISHLER, W. & ROSE, R. (2001), “What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 34, n° 1, 30 : 62.
• NEWTON, K. (2001), “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy”, International Political Science Review, vol. 22, n° 2, 201 : 214.
• NOOTEBOOM, B. (2006), “Social Trust, Institutions and Trust”, Center Working Paper No.2006-35, Tilburg University.
• ORLOFF, A. (1996), “Gender in the Welfare State”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 22, 51 : 78.
• PATULNY, R. (2005), “Social Rights and Social Capital: Welfare and Co-operation in Complex Global Society”, American Review of Public Affairs, vol. 6, n° 1, 59 : 75.
• ROTHSTEIN, B. & STOLLE, D. (2002), “How Political Institutions Create and Destroy Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust”, Paper prepared for the 98th meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston, MA, August 29 – September 2, 2002.
• ROTHSTEIN, B. & USLANER, E. (2006), “All for All: Equality and Social Trust”, Center for European Studies, Working paper Series No. 117.
• SCRUGGS, L. & ALLAN J. (2006), “Welfare State Decommodification in Eighteen OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 16, n° 1, 55 : 72.
• STOLLE, D. & ROCHON, T. (1999), “The Myth of American Exceptionalism: A Three Nation Comparison of Associational Membership and Social Capital”, J. Van Deth, M. Marraffi, K. Newton and P. Whiteley (eds.), Social Capital and European Democracy, London, Routledge, 192 : 209
• De SWAAN, A. (1988), In Care of the State: Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era, New York, Polity Press, Oxford University Press.
• SZRETER, S. (2002), “The State of Social Capital: Bringing Back in Power, Politics and History”, Theory and Society, vol. 31, n° 5, 573 : 621.
• TILLMAR, M. & LINDKVIST, L. (2007), “Cooperation Against All Odds: Finding Reasons for Trust Where Formal Institutions Fail”, International Sociology, vol. 22, n° 3, 343 : 366.
• THOMAS, C. (1997), “Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and Their Employees”, Administration & Society, vol. 30, n° 2, 166 : 193.
• USLANER, E. (2000-2001), “Producing and Consuming Trust”, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 115, n° 4, 569 : 590.
• VAN OORSCHOT, W. & ARTS, W. (2005), “The Social Capital of European Welfare States: The Crowding-out Hypothesis Revisited”, Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 15, n° 1, 5: 26.