Globalisation and War: The Historical and Current Controversy on Humanitarian Interventions

Year 2009, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 59 - 72, 30.05.2016

Josef Bordat

Abstract

In the debate about the question if, when, and how humanitarian interventions can afford peace and justice, military action needs to be taken into consideration. To discuss the meaning of justice in relation to military intervention, conclusions can be drawn from a historical view of the bellum iustum topic, as treated by the Spanish scholars Sepúlveda, Vitoria and Las Casas. Historical analysis reveals the principles both for the ius ad bellum and the ius in bello, that can be found in a recent proposal, the report The Responsibility To Protect (2001) of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). In addition, for the recovery of justice, a ius post bellum for the prosecution of “crimes against humanity,” as intended by the International Criminal Court (ICC), seems important.

Keywords

Globalisation, Humanitarian Interventions, War

References

• Augustine (2001) De Civitate Dei. Bamberg: C. C. Buchner.
• International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (2001) The Responsibility to Protect. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: IDRC.
• Las Casas, Bartolomé de (1988) Apología, in: Obras completas (vol. 9), ed. Paulino Casteñeda Delgado. Madrid: Alianza.
• Sepşlveda, Juan Ginés de (1951) Democrates segundo o de las justas causas de la guerra contra los indios. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
• Thomas Aquinas (1962) Summa Theologica. Rome: Marietti.
• US Government (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America.