Anadolu Miken Seramiği Geometrik Motif Repertuvarına Genel Bir Bakış

Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 109 - 122, 30.12.2016

Nur Deniz Ünsal

Abstract

M.Ö. ikinci binyılın ikinci yarısında, Anadolulu halkların Kıta Yunanistan ve
Adaların çağdaş kültürleri ile ticaret nedeniyle yakın bir bağlantı içerisinde olduğu
anlaşılmaktadır. Bu bağlantıların belirlenmesinde önemli göstergelerden biri,
özellikle Batı Anadolu’da gerçekleşen kazılar sonucunda ele geçen yerli ve ithal
Miken seramikleridir. Bezeme motifi olarak kullanılan dalgalı çizgiler, sınırlı ve
bağlantılı yarım daireler, ağ, dama tahtası, zigzag, üçgen ve panel triglif motifleri
gibi geometrik motifler, yaygın olarak, geniş bir zaman sürecinde kaplar üzerinde
yer almıştır.

Keywords

Anadolu, Batı Anadolu, Geç Tunç Çağı, Miken Seramiği, Geometrik Motifler

An Overview to The Geometric Motif Repertoire of Anatolian Mycenaean Pottery

Abstract

It is understood that Anatolian people had close contact with the contemporary
cultures of Mainland Greece and the Islands due to the trade relations in the second
part of second millenium BC. One of the important indicators in determining these
links are the local and imported Mycenaean pottery found during the excavations
mainly held in Western Anatolia. These decorative geometric motifs such as wavy
lines, isolated semicircles, linked semicircles, chequers, zigzags, diaper net, triangles,
panelled patterns commonly took place on the vessels in the process of a wide range
of time.

Keywords

Anatolia, Western Anatolia, Late Bronze Age, Mycenaean Pottery, Geometric Motifs

References

• Barber, Robin L.N (1974). “Phylakopi 1911 and the history of the later Cycladic Bronze Age”. BSA, 69, 1-53.
• Burns, Bryan E. (2010). ”Trade” The Oxford Handbook of Bronze Age Aegean (ca. 3000-1000 BC), 291-304.
• Dickinson, Oliver Thomas P. K. (1974). “The Definition of Late Helladis I.” BSA, 69, 109-20.
• French, Elizabeth (1967). “Pottery from Late Helladic IIIB1 Destruction Contexts at Mycenae”, BSA, 62, 149-93.
• Frizell, B. Santillo (1986). Asine II.3 Results of the Excavations Esat of the Acropolis 1970-74, The Late and Final Mycenaean Periods, Stockholm.
• Furumark, Arne (1941a). The Mycenaean Pottery. Analysis And Classification. Stockholm.
• Furumark, Arne (1941b). The Chronology Of Mycenaean Pottery. Stockholm.
• Furumark, Arne (1992). Mycenaean Pottery III. Plates. Stockholm.
• Günel, Sevinç (2010). “Mycenaean Cultural İmpact On The Çine (Marsyas) Plain, Southwest Anatolia: The Evidence From Çine-Tepecik”, Anatstud., 60, 25-49.
• Mountjoy, Penelope A. (1986). Mycenaean Decorated Pottery: A Guide to Identification. Gothenburg: Aström.
• Mountjoy, Penelope A. (1993). Mycenaean Pottery: An Introduction. Oxford.
• Mountjoy, Penelope A. (1999). Regional Mycenaean Decorated Pottery. Rahden.
• Mountjoy, Penelope A. (2008). The Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe University Collections. The Mycenaean And The Minoan Pottery (Frankfurter Archaologische Shriften.) Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
• Özgünel, A. Coşkun (1996). Mykenische Keramik in Anatolien, Asia Minor Studien, Band 23, Bonn.
• Özgünel, A. Coşkun (2013). Anadolu’da Miken Seramiği, Anadolu Ek Dizi II.1 Monografi Serisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih – Coğrafya Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü Dergisi, Ankara.
• Shelton, Kim S. (2010). “Mainland Greece”. The Bronze Age Aegean (ca. 3000-1000 BC), Oxford, 139-148.
• van Wijngaarden, Gert Jan M. (2002). Use and Appreciation of Mycenaean Pottery in the Levant, Cyprus, and Italy (ca. 1600-1200 BC). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.