Research Article

Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation

Volume: 3 Number: 5 S October 5, 2017
EN TR

Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation

Abstract

Accounting standards use a common accounting language in the international arena, to increase the transparency of records, institutionalism has emerged in the accounting world as a result of crises occurring in order to facilitate and ensure the availability on.  After the large accounting crisis in many European countries, especially America has made various arrangements. The accounting standards are made in order to create one of the editing world in a common accounting language. These facts are also used within the framework of our country since 1994 The Uniform Accounting System and Accounting Standards harmonization efforts emerges as a problem of today's accountant. At this stage, the purpose of our work on the uniform accounting system (UAS) Inventories and accounts group of Turkish Accounting Standards (TMS) - 2 Inventories application of the standard, explaining the use is collected in the form of intervening to identify the differences and advantages and disadvantages. Inventories account for this study group UAS and TMS-2 is elucidated differences are examined according to the examples according to the embodiment of use. In conclusion TMS-2 Inventories advantages and disadvantages brought by the standard were determined. The study also emerged the most important differences inventories maturity difference, not given the differences and exchange rate differences arising from interest on loans to inventory costs, expensed the difference emerged, differences in the choice of costing methods, inventories seen in impairment valuation and value have been identified as differences. The inventories standards in the financial condition of the company to reflect are among the more important advantages of the recording. A conclusion with the operation of Turkish Accounting Standards (TMS) - 2 Inventories of applications and the use of standard explained uniform will be attempted to be determined with the help of accounting system with examples of the differences and make efforts to contribute to the literature.

Keywords

References

  1. Akgün, A.İ., (2012), “ TMS-2 Stoklar Standardı Kapsamında Tam Maliyet Ve Normal Maliyete Göre Düzenlenen Gelir Tabloları Karşılaştırması”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 17, 2:229-246.
  2. Bağdat, A., (2008), “Uluslar Arası Finansal Raporlama Standartları- 2 İle TMS- 2 Stoklar Standardı’nın Karşılaştırılması”, Sakarya Ünv. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi,
  3. Boyar, E. ve A.H. Güngörmüş (2006), “TMS-2 Stoklar Standardında Maliyet Yöntemi Ve Bir Uygulama Önerisi”, Analiz Dergisi, Cilt:7, 16:83-91.
  4. Bozkurt,İ., (2013), Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları, Adalet Yayınevi.
  5. Coşkun, Ali ve Güngörmüş, Ali Haydar, (2009), “Hastanelerde Hizmet Üretim Maliyetlerinin TMS- 2’ye Göre Muhasebeleştirilmesi”, Mali Çözüm Dergisi, Sayı: 95.
  6. Dursun, A. ve S. Yalnız (2013), “Konaklama İşletmelerinde Hizmet Üretim Maliyetleri -Tms 2 Stoklar Ve Tms 18 Hasılat Standartları Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 27, 1: 139-157.
  7. Gökçen,G.; Ataman,A., ve Başak,Ç.C.(2006). Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları Uygulamaları. İstanbul: Beta Basım.
  8. Gönen, S. Ve Ç. Demir, (2012), “Vergi Usul Kanun Ve Kobi TFRS Bölüm 13 Açısından Stokların Değerlendirilmesi”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 4, 2: 163-171.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

October 5, 2017

Submission Date

February 10, 2017

Acceptance Date

July 12, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 5 S

APA
Derya Başkan, T. (2017). Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(5 S), 1593-1605. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.327624
AMA
1.Derya Başkan T. Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3(5 S):1593-1605. doi:10.24289/ijsser.327624
Chicago
Derya Başkan, Tuba. 2017. “Uniform Group Accounting and Inventory Accounting Standards in the Group Cost Evaluation of Calculation”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3 (5 S): 1593-1605. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.327624.
EndNote
Derya Başkan T (October 1, 2017) Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3 5 S 1593–1605.
IEEE
[1]T. Derya Başkan, “Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 5 S, pp. 1593–1605, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.24289/ijsser.327624.
ISNAD
Derya Başkan, Tuba. “Uniform Group Accounting and Inventory Accounting Standards in the Group Cost Evaluation of Calculation”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3/5 S (October 1, 2017): 1593-1605. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.327624.
JAMA
1.Derya Başkan T. Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3:1593–1605.
MLA
Derya Başkan, Tuba. “Uniform Group Accounting and Inventory Accounting Standards in the Group Cost Evaluation of Calculation”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 5 S, Oct. 2017, pp. 1593-05, doi:10.24289/ijsser.327624.
Vancouver
1.Tuba Derya Başkan. Uniform group accounting and inventory accounting standards in the group cost evaluation of calculation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017 Oct. 1;3(5 S):1593-605. doi:10.24289/ijsser.327624