Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 3, 851 - 864, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279163

Abstract

References

  • Calderwood, J. L. (2010). Macbeth: Counter-Hamlet. In H. Bloom (Ed.), William Shakespeare’s Macbeth (pp .7-31). New York: Infobase Publishing.
  • Charney, M. (1993). All of Shakespeare. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • James I. (1996). The true law of free monarchies and basilikon doron. D. Fischlin & M. Fontier (Eds.). Toronto: Centre for Renaissance and Reformation Studies Publications. (Original works published 1598 & 1599).
  • Ojakangas, M. (2013). The voice of conscience: A political genealogy of western ethical experience. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Pontano, G. (1997). On the prince. In J. Kraye (Ed.), Cambridge translations of Rena-issance philosophical texts: Volume II: Political philosophy (pp. 69-87). (N. Webb, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ribner, I. (2005). The English history play in the age of Shakespeare. London: Rout-ledge Library Editions.
  • Seneca, L. A. (1925). Ad lucilium epistulae morales. (Vol. 1). (R. M. Gummere, Trans.). E. Capps, T.E. Page, W.H.D. Rouse (Eds.). London:
  • William Heinemann. Shakespeare, W. (1992). Macbeth. B. A. Mowat & P. Werstine (Eds.). New York: Folger Shakespeare Library.
  • Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought: The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Strohm, P. (2011). Conscience: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tilmouth, C. (2011). Shakespeare’s open consciences. In H. E. Braun & E. Vallance (Eds.), The Renaissance conscience (pp. 67-81). Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell Publishing.

Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 3, 851 - 864, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279163

Abstract

Unlike Shakespeare’s greatest villains such as Richard III and Iago, Macbeth is not really comfortable in his role as murderer and usurper thanks to his acute awareness that he is acting against the moral and political values which underpin the social fabric. The aim of this paper is to explore the ways in which Macbeth falls afoul of the commonly accepted ethical and political norms in the discourse of the Renaissance era and finds himself in the role of a would-be  "Machiavel". He puts ‘words’ and his imagination into use to seize power and later to maintain his status as king of Scotland. Macbeth emerges as a great exemplar of how desire for political power silences the claims of conscience.


References

  • Calderwood, J. L. (2010). Macbeth: Counter-Hamlet. In H. Bloom (Ed.), William Shakespeare’s Macbeth (pp .7-31). New York: Infobase Publishing.
  • Charney, M. (1993). All of Shakespeare. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • James I. (1996). The true law of free monarchies and basilikon doron. D. Fischlin & M. Fontier (Eds.). Toronto: Centre for Renaissance and Reformation Studies Publications. (Original works published 1598 & 1599).
  • Ojakangas, M. (2013). The voice of conscience: A political genealogy of western ethical experience. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Pontano, G. (1997). On the prince. In J. Kraye (Ed.), Cambridge translations of Rena-issance philosophical texts: Volume II: Political philosophy (pp. 69-87). (N. Webb, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ribner, I. (2005). The English history play in the age of Shakespeare. London: Rout-ledge Library Editions.
  • Seneca, L. A. (1925). Ad lucilium epistulae morales. (Vol. 1). (R. M. Gummere, Trans.). E. Capps, T.E. Page, W.H.D. Rouse (Eds.). London:
  • William Heinemann. Shakespeare, W. (1992). Macbeth. B. A. Mowat & P. Werstine (Eds.). New York: Folger Shakespeare Library.
  • Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought: The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Strohm, P. (2011). Conscience: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tilmouth, C. (2011). Shakespeare’s open consciences. In H. E. Braun & E. Vallance (Eds.), The Renaissance conscience (pp. 67-81). Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell Publishing.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Lamia Kabal

Publication Date July 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 1 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Kabal, L. (2015). Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 1(3), 851-864. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279163
AMA Kabal L. Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. December 2015;1(3):851-864. doi:10.24289/ijsser.279163
Chicago Kabal, Lamia. “Macbeth’s Conscience and Moralizing Imagination”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 1, no. 3 (December 2015): 851-64. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279163.
EndNote Kabal L (December 1, 2015) Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 1 3 851–864.
IEEE L. Kabal, “Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 851–864, 2015, doi: 10.24289/ijsser.279163.
ISNAD Kabal, Lamia. “Macbeth’s Conscience and Moralizing Imagination”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 1/3 (December 2015), 851-864. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279163.
JAMA Kabal L. Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2015;1:851–864.
MLA Kabal, Lamia. “Macbeth’s Conscience and Moralizing Imagination”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 1, no. 3, 2015, pp. 851-64, doi:10.24289/ijsser.279163.
Vancouver Kabal L. Macbeth’s conscience and moralizing imagination. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2015;1(3):851-64.