Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 5 S, 1456 - 1462, 05.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311

Abstract

References

  • Bozdoğan, S. (2008). Modernizm ve ulusun inşası – Erken cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde mimari kültür. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Demiren, Ş. (1949). Le Corbusier ile mülâkat. Arkitekt. 11-12, 230-231
  • Eldem, S. H. (1931). Peşte sergisinde Türk Pavyonu. Arkitekt. 6, 187-192
  • Eldem, S.H. (1940). Yerli mimariye doğru. Arkitekt. 03-04, 69-74
  • Kuran, Aptullah. (2000). 19.yüzyıl Osmanlı mimarisi. Celal Esad Arseven anısına sanat tarihi semineri bildirileri (pp.234-240). İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi Matbaası.
  • Sönmez, M.Zeki. Türk-İtalyan siyaset ve sanat ilişkileri. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
  • Şafak, N. (2012, Ağustos). Osmanlı kuruluş döneminde devlet. Belleten. LXXVI (276), 431-454. İstanbul: Türk Tarih Kurumu
  • Tapan, M. & Sözen, M. (1973). 50 Yılın Türk Mimarisi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Türkiye’de mimarlık (2009). Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası.
  • Yeşilkaya, N.G. (1999). Halkevleri: ideoloji ve mimarlık. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 5 S, 1456 - 1462, 05.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311

Abstract

Examining the architectural actions, Turcs that have
founded many states throughout the history are observed to have maintained the
transfer of their culture, which has been shaped with different dinamics such
as regime, ethnic diversity, geography, religion and has followed a natural
flow even though factors has changed from time to time, to the early 20th
century. The 20th century of Turkish architecture has come to a
point where it serves to the efforts of creating a new identity that has
strayed from its natural line as a result of an ideological movement worldwide.
Even though the movement that was expressed as the National Renaissance of
Turkish architecture and demostrated its impact on public buildings during its
period has later been called National Style, given its starting point, architectural
components and referances, how accurate it is to be called national is open to
debate. In this study, the First National Architectural Movement and the Second
National Architectural Movement that have impact on the early 20th
century particularly are dealt with in terms of identity issues and ideological
approaches of Neo-Classical Architecture inTurkey.

References

  • Bozdoğan, S. (2008). Modernizm ve ulusun inşası – Erken cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde mimari kültür. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Demiren, Ş. (1949). Le Corbusier ile mülâkat. Arkitekt. 11-12, 230-231
  • Eldem, S. H. (1931). Peşte sergisinde Türk Pavyonu. Arkitekt. 6, 187-192
  • Eldem, S.H. (1940). Yerli mimariye doğru. Arkitekt. 03-04, 69-74
  • Kuran, Aptullah. (2000). 19.yüzyıl Osmanlı mimarisi. Celal Esad Arseven anısına sanat tarihi semineri bildirileri (pp.234-240). İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi Matbaası.
  • Sönmez, M.Zeki. Türk-İtalyan siyaset ve sanat ilişkileri. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
  • Şafak, N. (2012, Ağustos). Osmanlı kuruluş döneminde devlet. Belleten. LXXVI (276), 431-454. İstanbul: Türk Tarih Kurumu
  • Tapan, M. & Sözen, M. (1973). 50 Yılın Türk Mimarisi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Türkiye’de mimarlık (2009). Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası.
  • Yeşilkaya, N.G. (1999). Halkevleri: ideoloji ve mimarlık. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Esra Tokat

Publication Date October 5, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 5 S

Cite

APA Tokat, E. (2017). Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(5 S), 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311
AMA Tokat E. Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. October 2017;3(5 S):1456-1462. doi:10.24289/ijsser.319311
Chicago Tokat, Esra. “Identity and Ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3, no. 5 S (October 2017): 1456-62. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311.
EndNote Tokat E (October 1, 2017) Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3 5 S 1456–1462.
IEEE E. Tokat, “Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 5 S, pp. 1456–1462, 2017, doi: 10.24289/ijsser.319311.
ISNAD Tokat, Esra. “Identity and Ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 3/5 S (October 2017), 1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311.
JAMA Tokat E. Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3:1456–1462.
MLA Tokat, Esra. “Identity and Ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 5 S, 2017, pp. 1456-62, doi:10.24289/ijsser.319311.
Vancouver Tokat E. Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research. 2017;3(5 S):1456-62.