Society 5.0 in business management: A bibliometric analysis

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 163 - 174

Eda Köse

https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1732375

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Society 5.0 approach in the field of business management through bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review methodologies, thereby enabling assessments regarding the development of Society 5.0. Seventy articles published between 2020 and 2024 from the Scopus database have been analyzed. During the bibliometric analysis phase, the distributions of publishing countries, years, and keywords are evaluated. In the systematic literature review phase, thematic areas are identified as sustainability, digital transformation, Japan, cognitive mapping, and Democracy 5.0. The study evaluates different research perspectives related to the Society 5.0 approach in social sciences, particularly in the business field, and makes determinations regarding the current state and future development. The study provides valuable insights to stakeholders and managers in social sciences, particularly in business management, as well as policymakers, concerning the current state and future of the Society 5.0 approach.

Keywords

Society 5.0 , Business management , Systematic literature review

References

• Abduh, T., Remmang, H., Abubakar, H., & Karim, A. (2024). Entrepreneurship and MSME market orientation toward creative industries: Society Era 5.0 in Makassar city. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 14(2), 76-87.
• Abdul Aziz, A. Z., Abas Hidayat, A. H., Ellin Herlina, E. H., & Wanti Ernawati, W. E. (2023). Oligopoly market and monopolistic competition in the digital era: Shariah economic perspective. Quality Access to Success, 24(193), 61-67.
• Acer, H. & Alkan, A.T. (2024). Society 5.0 concept: biometric analysis via vosviewer. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(1), 17-35.
• Acioli, C., Scavarda, A. & Reis, A. (2021). Applying Industry 4.0 technologies in the COVID–19 sustainable chains. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(5), 988-1016.
• Alves, A. C. (2022). Lean thinking: an essential mindset. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 50(4), 127-133.
• Amadi-Echendu, J., & Thopil, G. A. (2020). Resilience is paramount for managing socio-technological systems during and post-Covid-19. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 118-128.
• Anggraeni, T., Gaffar, V., Disman, D., Dirgantari, P. D., & Handayani, T. (2023). Tourist satisfaction in era Society 5.0 as a marketing strategy. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10(6), 877-887.
• Arı, E. S. (2021). Süper akıllı toplum: Toplum 5.0. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 455-479.
• Arıcı, T., & Kitapci, H. (2021). An Investigation of the impact of the concept of Society 5.0 on Total Quality Management: The Future of Human-Oriented Technology Studies “Social Quality”. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3, 81-92.
• Ashta, A., & Stokes, P. (2023). A consideration of the dimensions of servant leadership in intercultural contexts: a focal case study of a UK executive in Japan. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 347-368.
• Baier-Fuentes, H., Merigó, J. M., Amorós, J. E., & Gaviria-Marín, M. (2019). International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 385-429.
• Balogun, A. L., Marks, D., Sharma, R., Shekhar,H., Balmes, C., Maheng, D., Arshad, A., & Salehi, P. (2020). Assessing the potentials of digitalization as a tool for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in Urban Centres. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53.
• Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., Pascucci, F., Dezi, L., Carayannis, E., Revel, G. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2022). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new quintuple helix design thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 113, 1-13.
• Borchardt, M., Pereira, G. M., Milan, G. S., Scavarda, A. R., Nogueira, E. O., & Poltosi, L. C. (2022). Industry 5.0 beyond technology: An analysis through the lens of business and operations management literature. Organizacija, 55(4), 305-321.
• Butenko, D., Zaslavska, K., & Sheianova, Y. (2023). Scientific and methodological principles of organizational capital management and its assessment. Economics of Development, 22(3), 52-61.
• Cabinet Office. (2015). Report on the 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan Council for Science, Technology and Innovation. Retrieved from: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/5basicplan_en.pdf
• Calp, M. H., & Bütüner, R. (2022). Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society. In Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0. Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 175–194.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2021a). Democracy of climate and climate for democracy: The evolution of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(4), 2050-2082.
• Carayannis, E. G., Draper, J., & Bhaneja, B. (2021b). Towards fusion energy in the Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0 context: Call for a global commission for urgent action on fusion energy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(4), 1891-1904.
• Carayannis, E. G., Christodoulou, K., Christodoulou, P., Chatzichristofis, S. A., & Zinonos, Z. (2021c). Known unknowns in an era of technological and viral disruptions—implications for theory, policy, and practice. Journal Of The Knowledge Economy, 1-24.
• Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F., & Grigoroudis, E. (2022a). Helix trilogy: The triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2272-2301.
• Carayannis, E. G., Dezi, L., Gregori, G., & Calo, E. (2022b). Smart environments and techno-centric and human-centric innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A quintuple helix innovation system view towards smart, sustainable, and inclusive solutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 926-955.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022c). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(4), 3445-3471.
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2022d). Towards an emerging unified theory of helix architectures (EUTOHA): Focus on the quintuple innovation helix framework as the integrative device. Triple Helix, 9(1), 65-75.
• Carayannis, E. G., Canestrino, R., & Magliocca, P. (2023). From the dark side of industry 4.0 to society 5.0: Looking “beyond the box” to developing human-centric innovation ecosystems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6695-6711.
• Casazza, M., & Gioppo, L. (2020). A playwriting technique to engage on a shared reflective enquiry about the social sustainability of robotization and artificial intelligence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119201.
• Chen, Y. (2017). Integrated and intelligent manufacturing: Perspectives and enablers. Engineering, 3, 588–595.
• Ciasullo, M. V., Orciuoli, F., Douglas, A., & Palumbo, R. (2022). Putting Health 4.0 at the service of Society 5.0: Exploratory insights from a pilot study. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 80, 101163.
• Çipi, A., Fernandes, A. C. R., Ferreira, F. A., Ferreira, N. C., & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I. (2023). Detecting and developing new business opportunities in society 5.0 contexts: A sociotechnical approach. Technology in Society, 73, 1-13.
• Darani, Z. H., Taheri Demne, M., Zanjirani, D. M., & Zackery, A. (2021). Conceptualization of a new generation of smart energy systems and the transition toward them using anticipatory systems. European Journal of Futures Research, 9, 1-17.
• Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., Orlando, B., & Mustilli, M. (2023). Toward the human–centered approach. A revised model of individual acceptance of AI. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100856.
• Duman, M. Ç. (2022). Toplum 5.0: İnsan odaklı dijital dönüşüm. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, (82), 309-336.
• Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.
• Fathi, M., Marufuzzaman, M., Buchanan, R. K., Rinaudo, C. H., Houte, K. M., & Bian, L. (2021). An integrated pricing, QoS-aware sensor location model for security protection in Society 5.0. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(11), 3863-3875.
• Ferreira, A. C. D. A., Titotto, S. L. M. C., & Akkari, A. C. S. (2022). Urban agriculture 5.0: An exploratory approach to the food system in a super smart society. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(4), 455.
• Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal Of Production Economics, 220, 1-10.
• Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Fathi, M., Rejeb, A., Foroughi, B., & Nikbin, D. (2024). Beyond Industry 4.0: a systematic review of Industry 5.0 technologies and implications for social, environmental and economic sustainability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration (ahead-of-print). 1-14.
• Gurakan, İ., & Uzunırmak, Y. (2025). Toplum 5.0: büyük dönüşüm. Toplum Çalışmaları Enstitüsü.
• Habib, H., Wagner, M., Baldé, C. P., Martínez, L. H., Huisman, J., & Dewulf, J. (2022). What gets measured gets managed–does it? Uncovering the waste electrical and electronic equipment flows in the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 181, 1-12.
• Handayani, W., Semara, O. Y., Rahayu, F., & Shaddiq, S. (2022). Digital marketing as an integrated marketing communication strategy in village owned business agencies “Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDesa)” based on local wisdom in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. Proc. Eng. Sci, 4(2), 137-142.
• Hao, X., Yan, J., Sha, J., Ke, W., He, G., Song, C., Ma, Y. & Zhang, G. (2021). Exploring the synthetic optimal policies for solving problems of agricultural water use with a dynamic optimization simulation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 1-12.
• Islam, A., Wahab, S. A. & Latiff, A. A. (2022). Annexing a smart sustainable business growth model for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 18(2), 1-24.
• Ivanov, D. (2023). The Industry 5.0 framework: Viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research, 61(5), 1683-1695.
• Joko, J., Putra, A. A. P., & Isnawan, B. H. (2023). Implementation of IoT-Based human machine ınterface-learning media and problem-based learning to ıncrease students' abilities, skills, and ınnovative behaviors of ındustry 4.0 and society 5.0. TEM Journal, 12(1), 1-13.
• Kao, L. J., Chiu, C. C., Lin, H. T., Hung, Y. W., & Lu, C. C. (2024). Unveiling the dimensions of digital transformation: A comprehensive taxonomy and assessment model for business. Journal of Business Research, 176, 114595.
• Kemendi, Á., Michelberger, P., & Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2022). Industry 4.0 and 5.0-organizational and competency challenges of enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26, 1-14.
• Khoshsepehr, Z., Alimohammadlou, M., Mohammadi, A., & Kordshouli, H. A. R. (2023). The fourth industrial revolution: mapping the future. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 37(5-6), 512-537.
• Kumar, S., & Mallipeddi, R. R. (2022). Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions. Production and Operations Management, 31(12), 4488-4500.
• Kumar, S., Suhaib, M., Asjad, M., & Salah, B. (2022). Industry 4.0 and its suitability in post COVID-19. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 1-12.
• Kurniawati, E., Kohar, U. H. A., & Pirzada, K. (2022). Change or destroy: the digital transformation of Indonesian msmes to achieve sustainable economy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 1-14.
• Långstedt, J., Spohr, J., & Hellström, M. (2023). Are our values becoming more fit for artificial intelligence society? A longitudinal study of occupational values and occupational susceptibility to technological substitution. Technology in Society, 72, 1-15.
• Lechevalier, S. (2024). Society 5.0 and new capitalism: Complementarities and contradictions. Asia Pacific Business Review, 30(3), 467-484.
• Leon, R. D., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2024). Preparing for industry 5.0: A methodology for avoiding corporate amnesia. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(1), 120-139.
• Liashenko, O., & Dluhopolskyi, O. (2024). Uncovering the ınterplay between social welfare preferences and society 5.0 achievement: ımplications for sustainable development. Economics-Innovatıve And Economıcs Research Journal, 12(1), 175-197.
• Lv, Z., Wang, N., Ma, X., Sun, Y., Meng, Y., & Tian, Y. (2022). Evaluation standards of intelligent technology based on financial alternative data. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100229.
• Magni, D., Del Gaudio, G., Papa, A., & Della Corte, V. (2024). Digital humanism and artificial intelligence: the role of emotions beyond the human–machine interaction in Society 5.0. Journal of Management History, 30(2), 195-218.
• Mahat, N. (2024). Society 5.0: A bibliometric analysis from management approach. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 1-19.
• Marić, J., Opazo-Basáez, M., Vlačić, B., & Dabić, M. (2023). Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122605.
• McKenzie, M., Bossuyt, J., Boutron, P., Hoffmann, I., & Mulrow, T. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372(71).
• Міщук, Є. В., Рябикіна, Н. І., Ушенко, Н. В., Гамова, О. В., Ткаченко, С. М., & Ястремська, Н. М. (2022). Intellectual capital as a factor forming economic security of enterprises in society 5.0. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, (19), 269-277.
• Nagy, K., & Hajrizi, E. (2019). Building pillars for adapting society 5.0 in post-conflict countries. IFAC Papers Online, 55(25), 40-45.
• Nair, A., Pillai, S. V., & Senthil Kumar, S. A. (2024). Towards emerging Industry 5.0 – a review-based framework. Journal of Strategy and Management, https://doi:10.1108/JSMA-04-2023-0067
• Narkhede, G. B., Pasi B. N., Rajhans,N., & Kulkarni, A., (2025). Industry 5.0 and sustainable manufacturing: a systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(2), 608-635.
• Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13, 6567.
• Nguyen, T., Duong, Q. H., Van Nguyen, T., Zhu, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022). Knowledge mapping of digital twin and physical internet in Supply Chain Management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 244, 108381.
• Noersasongko, E., Sartıka, M., Aqmala, D., & Hasıbuan, Z. A. (2022). G-Aspoo-L: The Technopreneurship-Based Supply Chain Management Model For Souvenirs Msmes To Reach Customer Value Creation. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(12), 59-69.
• Patalas-Maliszewska, J. & Łosyk, H. (2024). Changes in sustainable development in manufacturing in cases of unexpected occurrences—A systematic review. Sustainability, 16(717).
• Purnomo, A., Asitah, N., Latukismo, T. H., Rosyidah, E., & Kurniawan, B. K. (2021, April). Society 5.0 publication mapping using a scientometric perspective. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1), 012141. IOP Publishing.
• Ramli, T. S., Ramli, A. M., Adolf, H., Damian, E., & Palar, M. R. A. (2020). Over-the-top media in digital economy and society 5.0. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 8(3), 60-67.
• Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Podbregar, I. (2021). Mapping of the emergence of Society 5.0: A bibliometric analysis. Organizacija, 54(4), 293-305.
• Roring, R. S., & How, B. C. (2022). Towards Socıety 5.0: A pilot study on costless smart transportation business model. International Journal of Business & Society, 23(1), 1-14.
• Rosak-Szyrocka, J. (2024). The era of digitalization in education where do universities 4.0 go?. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 32(1).
• Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2021). Digital literacy in digital society 5.0: Some challenges. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 1-9.
• Salim, A. R. (2022). The up-scaling organization structure-an integrative approach. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 7(3), 53-63.
• Santos, C.T., Ferreira, F.A., Dabić, M., Ferreira, N.C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). “Too small to shine? Not really!”: developing Society 5.0 adaptation initiatives for SMEs. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 71, 9058-9079.
• Sajovic, I., & Podgornik, B. B. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of visualizations in computer graphics: A study. Sage, 1-17.
• Seçkin, Z., & Köse, Y. (2024). Toplum 5.0 ile ilgili çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi: Scopus örneği. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 20(1). 228-245.
• Shaddiq, S., Haryono, S., Muafı, M., & Isfıanadewı, D. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of cyberloafing in service provider industries: Industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 157-167.
• Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., & Singh, P. L. (2022). Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. Technology in Society, 68, 101887.
• Sterev, N., Sabeva, M., Zlateva, R., & Dimitrova, V. (2020). Business Social Network (BSN): Does the Business Escape from Reality Impossible?. In Eurasian Business Perspectives: Proceedings of the 26th and 27th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conferences (pp. 129-144). Springer International Publishing.
• Taj, I., & Zaman, N. (2022). Towards industrial revolution 5.0 and explainable artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 12(1), 295-320.
• Thakur, R., Borkar, P. S., & Agarwal, M. (2022). Smart Society 5.0 for social and technological sustainability. In Decision Analytics for Sustainable Development in Smart Society 5.0: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 299-319). Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore.
• Tlili, A., Huang, R., & Kinshuk, X. (2023). Metaverse for climbing the ladder toward ‘Industry 5.0’and ‘Society 5.0’? The Service Industries Journal, 43(3-4), 260-287.
• Tornjanski, V., Knežević, S., & Vulević, B. (2023). Perspectives of project management sustainability in the Society 5.0 context: Moving forward towards human-centricity. European Project Management Journal, 13(1), 61-73.
• Tunji-Olayeni, P., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A., & Chukwu, N. (2024). Research trends in industry 5.0 and its application in the construction industry. Technological Sustainability, 3(1), 1-23.
• Wahyuningtyas, R., Disastra, G., & Rismayani, R. (2023). Toward cooperative competitiveness for community development in economic society 5.0. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 17(3), 594-620.
• Whittaker, D. H. (2023). Open access: Beyond secular stagnation: A digital and green economy?. In Japan’s Secular Stagnation and Beyond, 87-108.
• Whittaker, D. H. (2024). Japan’s quest for a sustainable, virtuous circle of growth and innovation. Asia Pacific Business Review, 30(3), 451-466.
• Vesperi, W., Gagnidze, I., & Sobolieva, T. (2024). Industrial revolutions and human capital for the new normal: a cross-country analysis of the university system. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(10), 2402-2417.
• Yamasaki, Y. (2024). The Japanese government’s promotion of automated driving driven by shared positive expectations. Futures, 155, 103282.
• Zaloznova, Y., Pankova, O., & Ostafiichuk, Y. (2020). Global and Ukrainian labour markets in the face of digitalization challenges and the threats of the COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual Economics, 3(4), 106-130.