GENDER DIFFERENCES IN CHARACTER STRENGTHS, SOCIAL CONNECTIONS, AND BELIEFS ABOUT CRIME AMONG ADOLESCENTS

Abstract

Most gang-involved youth in Canada are predominantly males (94%) and between the age of 16 and 18 (Youth Gangs in Canada, 2007). However, young adolescent girls are now increasingly seen among youth gangs (Girls, Gangs, and Sexual Exploitation in British Columbia, 2010). Within the strength-based framework for research targeting social problems such as youth violence and criminal gang activities (Tweed, Bhatt, Dooley, Spindlier, Douglas, & Viljoen, 2011), a study was conducted in local high schools in British Columbia; Canada, in which 194 boys and 226 girls aged 12 to 14 participated. The results of the preliminary analyses of the data indicated several gender differences among the participants’ character strengths, social connections, and cognitive beliefs pertaining to violence. Boys in comparison to girls, reported a higher level of self-esteem, and a stronger belief in violence as a way to deal with conflicts. Girls reported higher satisfaction in the area of friendship than boys. Additionally, girls reported higher levels of parental monitoring of where they were, who they were with and what they were doing. These preliminary findings suggest that prevention strategies would serve the youth well when they are derived from a targeted gendered strategies with a focus on a strength-based approach for a positive adolescent development

Keywords

• Adolescence
• Gender differences
• Character Strengths
• Gangs
• Violence

References

1. Abbotsford Youth Commission. (2010). Gangs, Girls, and Sexual Exploitation in
2. British Columbia. Report of the Victim Services and Crime Prevention, Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General. http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/crimeprevention/publications/docs/gang-prevention- girls-sexual-exploitation.pdf [Accessed 9.9.2012]
3. Arnett, J. (1999). Adolescent Storms and Stress Reconsidered. American Psychologist, 54(5). 317-326.
4. Bandura A. (1973). Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Carvajal, S., Clair, S., Nash, S., Evans, R. (1998). Relating Optimism, Hope, and Self-esteem to Social Influences in Deterring Substance Use in Adolescents.
6. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 17(4):443–465. Constantine, N. A. and Benard, B. (2001). California Healthy Kids Survey
7. Resilience Assessment Module: Technical Report. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute. Dahlbert, L. L., Toal, S. B., Swahn, M. H., & Behren, C. B. (2005). Measuring
8. Violence-related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Influences Among Youths: A Compendium of Assessment Tools. Atlanta, Goergia: Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Dorais. M. & Corriveau, P. (2009). Gangs and Girls: Understanding Juvenile

9. Prostitution. Montreal: McGill University Press. Egley, A., Jr., & O’Donnell, C. E. (2009). Highlights of the 2007 National Youth
10. Gang Survey. OJJDP Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and Society. New York:Norton
11. Feinberg, M., Ridenour, T., & Greenberg, M. (2007). Aggregating Indices of Risk and Protection for Adolescent Behavior Problems: The Communities that Care
12. Youth Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(6), 506-513. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (Eds.). (1990). Making Connections:
13. The Relational Worlds of Adolescent Girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hall, S. G. (1904). Adolescence: Its Psychology and its Relation to Physiology,
14. Anthropology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education (Vol 1). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts. Hay, D. F., Nash, A., Caplan, M., Swartzentruber, J., Ishikawa, F., & Vespo, J. (2011). The Emergence of Gender Differences in Physical Aggression in the Context of Conflict Between Young Peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 158-175.
15. Howell, J. C. (1998). Youth gangs: An Overview. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin.
16. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Hyde, J. S. 92005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, , 516-519.
17. Kelly, K., & Caputo, T. (2005). The Linkages Between Street Gangs and Organized Crime: The Canadian Experience. Journal of Gang Research, 13(1), 31.
18. Le, T. (2008). Acculturative Dissonance, Ethnic Identity, and Youth Violence.
19. National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(1), 1-9. Morrogiello, B. A., & Hogg, K. (2004). Mothers’ Reactions to Children
20. Misbehaving in Ways that Can Lead to Injury: Implications for Gender Differences in Children’s Risk Taking and Injuries. Sex Roles, 50, 103-118. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Srengths and Virtues.
21. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press. Public Safety Canada (2007). Youth Gangs in Canada: What Do We Know? http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/cp/bldngevd/_fl/2007-YG-1_e.pdf [Accessed 8.2012]
22. Ramirez, J. R., Crano, W. D., Quist, R., Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E. M., & Grandpre, J. (2004). Acculturation, Familism, Parental Monitoring, and Knowledge as
23. Predictors of Marijuana and Inhalant Use in Adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 3-11. Rosenberg M. (1965). Society and Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ:
24. Princeton University Press, 1965.
25. Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive Mediators of Aggression in
26. Adolescent Offenders Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580–588. Taylor, S. E. (2002). The Tending Instinct: How Nurturing is Essential to Who We
27. Are and How We Live. New York: Times Books. Thomas, C.R., Holzer, C.E., & Wall, J.A. (2004). Serious Delinquency and Gang
28. Membership. Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 61 – 81. Thornberry, T. P., Huizinga, D., & Loeber, R. (2004). The Causes and Correlates
29. Studies: Findings and Policy Implications, Juvenile Justice, 10, 3-19. Totten, M. (2009, March). Preventing Aboriginal Youth Gang Involvement in
30. Canada: A Gendered Approach. Paper presentation at the Aboriginal Policy Research Conference, Ottawa: ON, Canada. Tweed, R. & Bhatt, G. (2009, April). Conscious Reasons for Avoiding Crime: A
31. Preliminary Comparison of Cultural Groups. Poster presentation at the 89th Annual Convention of the Western Psychological Association. Portland, OR, USA. Tweed, R. G., Bhatt, G., Dooley, S., Spindler, A., Douglas, K. S., & Viljoen, J. (2011). Youth Violence and Positive Psychology: Research Potential Through
32. Integration. Canadian Psychology, 52, 11-121. Tweed, R., Bhatt, G., & Dooley, S. (2009, April). Cognitive Processes Associated with Law-abiding Behavior. Paper presentation at the meeting of the Applied
33. Positive Psychology, Warwick, United Kingdom. Tweed, R., Bhatt, G., & Dooley, S. (2011, May). Youth Life Satisfaction:
34. Associated with Parental Monitoring. Poster presentation at the meeting of the American Psychological Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. Unger, M. (2006). Strengths-based Counselling With at-risk Youth. Thousand
35. Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.