A STUDY ON LEARNING APPROACHES USED AMONG POST-GRADUATE STUDENTS IN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the method of learningapproaches adopted by post-graduate students in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and to identify whether these approaches are associated with demographic factors (age, gender, main streams, mode of study and working experience). Participants included 354 post-graduate students from different faculties in UTM whereas questionnaires were distributed via email and throughdesignated contact person. The One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed that there were significant differences on the usage of the three post-graduates’ learning approaches across age, main streams and years of working experience. Significance was not seen between learning approaches on gender and mode of study. Deep approach was found to be preferred approaches to their learning methods. Our investigation suggests that approach to learning should be included in their academics, however the suggestion is tailored according on the tasks given to the students. Hence, we concluded that further investigation could be carried out the effect of learning environment towards students dynamic in learning

Keywords

• learning approaches, deep approach, surface-disorganized approach, surface-rationale approach, post-graduate students, Research University

References

1. Chan, Y.K.R. (2010). The relationship between gender, age, study mode, locus of control, extracurricular activities, learning approaches and academic achievement: the case of full-time and part-time Hong Kong Chinese sub-degree students. School of Education Research Working Paper 2010. University of Leicester.
2. Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A. & Larsen, S. (2003), Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement, Emerald Education + Training, Vol. 48 No. 2/3, 2006, pp. 156-169.
3. Duff, A, Boyle, E, Dunleavy, K, Ferguson, J (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personalities and individual differences, 36 (2004) pp.1907–1920.
4. Entwistle, N.J., McCune, V. and Walker, P. (2001), “Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: analytical abstractions and everyday experiences”, in Sternberg, R.J. and Zhang, L.F. (Eds), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
5. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning (London Croom Helm).
6. Evans, C. J., Kirby, J. R., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2003). Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp.507–528.
7. Fung, L.Y. (2010). A study on the learning approaches of Malaysian students in relation to English language acquisition. American Journal of Scientific Research, 9, pp.5-11.
8. Kirby, J.R., Knapper, C.K., Evans, C.J., Carty, A.E., & Gadula, C. (2003). Approaches to learning at work and workplace climate. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(1), 31-52.

9. Law, C.S. & Meyer, H.F. (2009). Relationships between students’ demographic background, subject areas, and learning patterns in post-secondary education of Hong Kong. In Wang et al. (Eds.): ICHL 2009, pp.431-432. Berlin: Springer.
10. Lu, J., Yu, C.S. & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management, 40, pp.497-507. Magno, C. (2011). The use of study strategies on Mathematical problem solving. The International Journal of Research and Review, 6(2), pp.57-81.
11. Penglase, M. (2004). “Learning approaches in university calculus: the effects of an innovative assessment program” University of Western Sydney, pp.446-453.
12. Prat-Sala, M. & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self- efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Education Psychology, vol. 80, pp.283-305.
13. Richardson, J.T.E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students’ perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behavior in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, pp.867-893. Spicer, D. P. (2004). The impact of approaches to learning and cognition on academic performance in business and management. Emerald Education + Training, Volume 46 , No. 4, pp.194-205.