The Effects of QOS Level Degradation Cost on Provider Selection and Task Allocation Model in Telecommunication Networks

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 45 - 54, 01.06.2010

Hasan Huseyin Turan Nihat Kasap Berna Tektas Sivrikaya

https://izlik.org/JA46JJ64FK

Abstract

Firms acquire network capacity from multiple suppliers which offer different Quality of Service (QoS) levels. After acquisition, day-to-day operations such as video conferencing, voice over IP and data applications are allocated between these acquired capacities by considering QoS requirement of each operation. In optimal allocation scheme, it is generally assumed each operation has to be placed into resource that provides equal or higher QoS Level. Conversely, in this study it is showed that former allocation strategy may lead to suboptimal solutions depending upon penalty cost policy to charge degradation in QoS requirements. We model a cost minimization problem which includes three cost components namely capacity acquisition, opportunity and penalty due to loss in QoS

Keywords

Penalty Cost Policy , QoS Level , Heuristic , Break-even-point Analysis

References

• Bouras, C. and Sevasti, A. (2004). “SLA-based QoS pricing in DiffServ networks”, Computer Communications, Vol.27, pp.1868 – 1880.
• Comer, D. E. (2001). Computer Networks and Internets with Internet
• Applications, Third ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey Courcoubetis, C., Kelly, F. and Weber, R. (2000). “Measurement-based usage charges in communications networks”, Operations Research, 48 (4), pp.535–548.
• Doğan, A. and Özgüner, F. (2006). “Scheduling of a meta-task with QoS requirements in heterogeneous computing systems”, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 66, pp.181-196.
• Gupta, A., Kalyanaraman, S. and Zhang, L. (2006). “Pricing of risk for loss guaranteed intra-domain internet service contracts”, Computer Networks, 50, pp.2787-2804.
• Kasap, N., Aytug, H. and Erenguc, S. S. (2007). “Provider selection and task allocation issues in networks with different QoS levels and all you can send pricing”, Decision Support Systems, 43, pp.375 – 389.
• Lee, K. D. and Kim, S. (2002). “Optimization for adaptive bandwidth reservation in wireless multimedia networks”, Computer Networks, 38, pp.631-643.
• Mao, G. (2005). “A real time loss performance monitoring scheme”, Computer Communications, 28, pp.150–161.
• Pan W., Yu L., Wang S., Hua G., Xie G, and Zhang J. (2009), “Dynamic Pricing
• Strategy of Provider with Different QoS Levels in Web Service”, Journal of Networks, Vol.4 No:4, pp.228-234. Rana O., Warnier M. and Quillinan T. B. (2008), “Monitoring and Reputation
• Mechanisms for Service Level Agreements”, The Fifth International Workshop on Grid Economics and Business Models (GECON). Tektas, B. and Kasap, N. (2008). “Time and volume based optimal pricing strategies for telecommunication networks.” In Proceedings CD IAMOT 2008,
• Dubai: United Arab Emirates. Verma, S. Pankaj, R. K. and Garcia, A.L. (1998). “Call admission and resource reservation for guaranteed quality of service (GQoS) services in internet”,
• Computer Communications, 21, pp.362–374. Wu J., Yue W. and Wang S. (2006), “Stochastic model and analysis for capacity optimization in communication networks”, Vol.29, pp.2377-2385.
• Yuang, M. C. and Haung, Y. R. (1998). “Bandwidth assignment paradigms for broadband integrated voice/data networks”, Computer Communications, 21, pp.243–253.