HARNESSING HR GOVERNANCE IN EFFECTIVE VIRTUAL TEAMS

Abstract

This paper reports on human resource governance (HRG) that was explored in an ethically cleared, qualitative case study on effective virtual teams in the software industry of South Africa. Embedded in corporate governance, human resource management (HRM) and general management; HRG is recognised as a control mechanism employed by management. People risks in the software industry are common, with technology cited as a contributing factor. A purposive sample was selected, while data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire. The data were analysed by means of content analysis. Empirical evidence suggests that the traditional hierarchical role and purpose of a team leader and a team manager could be compromised in virtual teams; inflexible process management augments technology risks; and cross-country compliance with legislation contributes to greater knowledge creation. This study contributes to the emerging body of knowledge on the effective functioning of virtual teams and HR governance.

Keywords

• Virtual teams,HR governance (HRG),high-performance work practices,flexible work practices,knowledge creation

References

1. Aasi, P., Rusu, L., Leidner, D., Perjons, E., & Corrales Estrada, M. (2018). How Does the Organizational Culture of Collaborative Networks Influence IT Governance Performance in a Large Organization? http://hicss.hawaii.edu/. Aguilera, R.V., Judge, W.Q., & Terjesen, S.A. (2018). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43(1):87-109. Berry, G.R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 48(2):186-206. Brown, M.K., Huettner, B., & James-Tanny, C. (2007). Choosing the Right Tools for Your Virtual Team: Evaluating Wikis, Blogs, and Other Collaborative Tools. In Professional Communication Conference. (2007). IPCC. IEEE International (1-4). IEEE. Daniel, S., Agarwal, R., & Stewart, K.J. (2013). The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Information Systems Research, 24(2):312-333. De Bruyn, A.J., 2015. Prerequisites to the on-boarding of effective virtual teams. Journal of Contemporary M anagement, (12): 775 794. (ISSN: 1815 7440). Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2018). The landscape of qualitative research. (5th ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. Derven, M. (2016). Four drivers to enhance global virtual teams. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(1):1-8. Ebrahim, N.A., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: a literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3):2653-2669. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4):532-550. Forbes. (2018). Global 2000. www.forbes.com/2009/.../worlds-largest-companies-business-global-09 Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (2012). Controversias paradigmáticas, contradicciones y confluencias emergentes. YS Norman y D. Lincoln (comps.). Manual de investigación cualitativa, 2(1):38-78. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1):59-82. Hamersly, B., & Land, D. 2015. Building productivity in virtual project teams. Revista de Gestão e. DOI: 0.5585/gep.v6i1.305 Hart, P. (2017). Information Security and Virtual Teams. International Journal of Systems and Society (IJSS), 4(2):1-7. Horwitz, F.M., Bravington, D., & Silvis, U. (2006). The promise of virtual teams: identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(6):472-494. IODSA. (2015). King IV. https://www.iodsa.co.za/page/KingIV ILO. (2015). ILO termination of ISO Agreement. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/statements-and-speeches/WCMS_617802/lang--en/index.htm ILO. (2018). Towards the ILO Centenary. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/100/lang--en/index.htm Isenberg, P., Fisher, D., Paul, S.A., Morris, M.R., Inkpen, K., & Czerwinski, M. (2012). Co-located collaborative visual analytics around a tabletop display. IEEE Transactions on visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(5):689-702. ISO. (2016). ISO 30408. https://www.iso.org/about-us.html Kaehler, B., & Grundei, J. (2019). HR Governance as a Part of the Corporate Governance Concept. In HR Governance (27-50). Cham: Springer. Kakumba, U. (2012). Assessing the institutional capacity of external agencies in holding local governments accountable in Uganda. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 10(1):86-103. Kreitner, R., Kinicki, A., & Cole, N.D. (2006). Fundamentals of Organizational Behaviour: key concepts, skills & best practices. (1st ed.). Bingley, West Yorkshire, England: Special Materials Services. Konzelmann, S., Conway, N., Trenberth, L., & Wilkinson, F. (2006). Corporate governance and human resource management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 541-567. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The qualitative report, 12(2):238-254. Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J.C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3):1164-1188. Liu, B., McConnell, J.J., & Xu, W. (2017). The power of the pen reconsidered: The media, CEO human capital, and corporate governance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 76(1):175-188. Meyer, M., Roodt, G., & Robbins, M. (2011). Human resources risk management: governing people risks for improved performance: opinion paper. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1):1-12. Myers, S.T., & Haase, J.E. (1989). Guidelines for integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nursing Research, 38(5):299-301. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Morse, J.M., & Richards, L. (2013). Qualitative research design. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. Nakpodia, F., Adegbite, E., Amaeshi, K., & Owolabi, A. (2018). Neither principles nor rules: Making corporate governance work in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2):391-408. Olawuyi, D.S. (2015). The increasing relevance of rights-based approaches to resource governance in Africa: Shifting from regional aspiration to local realization. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 11(2):294-337. Roehling, M. (2017). The important but neglected legal context of virtual teams: Research implications and opportunities. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4):621-634. SABPP. (2017). HR Governance Fact Sheet. http://sabpp.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Fact-Sheet_May_v003-with-active-links.pdf Salkind, N.J. (2017). Exploring research. (9th ed.). Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students. (7th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education. Schwab, K. (2017). World Economic Forum: The fourth industrial revolution. (1st ed.). NY: Crown Business. Schutte, N., Barkhuizen, N., & Van der Sluis, L. (2015). The validation of a human resource management professional competence model for the South African context. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1):1-9. Segal-Horn, S. & Dean, A. (2009). Delivering ‘effortless experience’ across borders: Managing internal consistency in professional service firms. Journal of World Business, 44(1):41-50. Seymore, R.G. (2012). Handbook of research methods in social entrepreneurship. (1st ed.). Boston: Edward Elgar. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2016). Measuring corruption in Africa: The international dimension matters - African Governance Report IV. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/sites/www.un.org.africarenewal/files/Measuring_corruption_in_Africa_2016.pdf World Bank. (2016). Corporate Governance. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/corporate-governance World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Global Challenge insight report, World Economic Forum, Geneva. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/393272