Y. van Zyl

Year 2016, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 218 - 232, 01.06.2016

Y. van Zyl M. Dhurup

Abstract

WHEN THINGS GET TOUGH, THE TOUGH GET GOING: UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEIVED STRESS AND COPING MECHANISMS

Abstract

Stress has become an inevitable part of life for students in a university
environment due to various factors, such as increased pressure, competition,
decreased resources, inadequate family support and the increased use of drugs and
alcohol. Moreover, the transition from adolescence to adulthood for university
students is a difficult journey, filled with various risks, rapid changes and
seemingly endless choices when placed within a university environment. This
study examines perceived stress and coping strategies among university students.
A cross-sectional survey involving 334 students at a university in Gauteng, South
Africa was undertaken using validated perceived stress and coping scales. The
prevalence of stress among university students seems to be high. Through a factor
analysis procedure, two primary dimensions of stress were identified, namely
perceived helplessness and low self-efficacy and five primary coping strategies
are used by students, namely negativism and denial, emotional support,
introspection and veneration, substance abuse, and humour. Female students seem
to experience higher levels of stress compared to their male counterparts. The results point toward the need to develop a training module to promote proactive coping strategies and the improvement of the general self-efficacy of university students. Furthermore, these results have implications for designing stress reduction workshops with the assistance of the student support and counselling department in the university. Limitations and implications for further research are discussed

Keywords

Stress, coping, self-efficacy, university students

References

• Al-Dubai, S.A.R., Al-Naggar, R.A., Alshagga, M.A. & Rampal, K.G. (2011),
• “Stress and Coping Strategies of Students in a Medical Faculty in Malaysia”, Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 57-64. Carver, C.S. (1997), “You want to Measure Coping but your Protocol’s too Long:
• Consider the Brief COPE”, International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, Vol. , No. 1, pp. 92-100. Cohen, S. & Williamson, G. (1988), “Perceived Stress in a Probability Sample of the United States”, (in: S. Spacepan and S. Oskamp-Ed., The Social Psychology of
• Health,), Newbury Park, CA.: Sage, pp. 31-67. Darnopiha, O. (2014), Correlation Between Stress, Self-efficacy, Coping and Stages of Crohn’s Disease in Male and Female Patients. Higher Diploma in
• Psychology, Dublin: DBS School of Arts. Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1985), “If it Changes it must be a Process: Study of
• Emotion and Coping during Three Stages of a College Examination”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 150-170. Gerber, M., Brand, S., Feldmeth, A.K., Lang, C., Elliot, C., Holsboer-Trachsler, E. & Pühse, U. (2013), “Adolescents with High Mental Toughness Adapt Better to Perceived Stress: A Longitudinal Study with Swiss Vocational Students”,
• Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 54, pp. 808–814. Humphrey, J.H., Yow, D.A. & Bowden, W.W. (2000), Stress in College
• Athletics: Causes, Consequences, Coping, Bingham, NY: The Haworth Half- Court Press. Kadhiravan, S. & Kumar, K. (2012), “Enhancing Stress Coping Skills among
• College Students”, Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, Vol. 3, No. 41, pp. 49- Kausar, R. (2010), “Perceived Stress, Academic Workloads and use of Coping
• Strategies by University Students”, Journal of Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 45. Kim, D. & Kim, S.Y. (1995), “QUESC: An Instrument for Assessing the Service
• Quality of Sport Centers in Korea”, Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 208-220. Mertens, D.M. (2005), Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed
• Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. Mimura, C. & Griffiths, P. (2004), “A Japanese Version of the Perceived Stress
• Scale: Translation and Preliminary Test”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 379-385. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Pierceall, E.A. & Keim, M.C. (2007), “Stress and Coping Strategies among
• Community College Students”, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 31, pp. 703-712. Reeve, K.L., Shumaker, C.J., Yearwood, E.L., Crowell, N.A. & Riley, J.B. (2013), “Perceived Stress and Social Support in Undergraduate Nursing Students'
• Educational Experiences”, Nurse Education Today, Vol. 33, pp. 419-424. Shaban, I.A., Khater, W.A. & Akhu-Zaheya, L.M. (2012), “Undergraduate
• Nursing Students’ Stress Sources and Coping Behaviours during their Initial Period of Clinical Training: A Jordanian Perspective”, Nurse Education in Practice, Vol. 12, pp. 204-209. Sharma, N. & Kaur, A. (2011), “Factors associated with stress among nursing students”, Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, 7(1), 12-21.
• Sheu, S., Lin, H.-S. & Hwang, S.-L. (2002), “Perceived Stress and Physio-Psycho
• Social Status of Nursing Students during their Initial Period of Clinical Practice: The Effect of Coping Behaviours”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. , pp. 165-175. Stoliker, B.E. & Lafreniere, K.D. (2015), “The Influence of Perceived Stress,
• Loneliness, and Learning Burnout on University Students’ Educational Experience”, College Student Journal, Vol. 49. No. 1, pp. 146-160. Struthers, C.W., Perry, R.P. & Menec, V.H. (2000), “An Examination of the Relationship among Academic Stress, Coping, Motivation, and Performance in
• College”, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 581-592. Wintre, M.G. & Yaffe, M. (2000), “First-Year Students’ Adjustment to University
• Life as a Function of Relationships with Parents”, Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 9-37. Wolf, L., Stidham, A.W. & Ross, R. (2015), “Predictors of Stress and Coping
• Strategies of US Accelerated vs. Generic Baccalaureate Nursing Students: An Embedded Mixed Methods Study”, Nurse Education Today, Vol. 35, pp. 201-205.