UNBLOCK ARGUMENTS IN MALAYSIAN SOPOBLOGS
Year 2012,
Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 347 - 356, 01.06.2012
Sharifah Shahnaz Bt Syed Husain
Hawa Rohany
Noorzan Haji Mohd Noor
Abstract
Weblogs are gaining popularity across the global digital community. They provide opportunities for individuals to engage in argumentation and express views as well as disseminate information or discuss issues. This research investigates the linguistic features of argumentation in selected Malaysian social- political weblogs based on the discourse analysis of six weblog posts written by two Malaysian social-political (sopo) bloggers on social themes. This comparative analysis was facilitated by a comprehensive pragma-dialectic model of argumentation as well as a critical discussion of the impact of socio-cultural factors on argumentation contained in the selected Malaysian blogs. The study also offers useful insights into the ways in which standpoints are expressed in argumentations in different cultural contexts. Awareness of the salient features of cultural argumentation would enable blogs to be better understood by a wider audience from other cultures, and ultimately reaching a more global readership
References
- Asma Abdullah & Pedersen, Paul B,(2009),Understanding multicultural Malaysia. Delights, Puzzles & Irritations, Kuala Lumpur: Pearson. Prentice Hall.
- Crystal, David (2011),Internet linguistics, London-New York : Routledge. Francis & Taylor Group.
- Gumperz, John Joseph (1982), Discourse strategies: Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hall, Edward Twitchell (1976), Beyond culture: New York: Doubleday.
- Van Eemeren, Frans H, Grootendorst, Rob, & Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck (2002), Argumentation - Analysis, evaluation and presentation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Van Eemeren, Frans H, Houtlosser, Peter, & Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck (2007), Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study, Netherland: Springer Publisher.
- Zarefsky, David (2005), Argumentation: The study of effective reasoning, Course guidebook, (2nd Ed.), Northwestern University: The Teaching Company.
- Scollon,Ron, Scollon, Suzanne Wong and Jones, Rodney H (2012), Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach (3rd edition),West Sussex:Willey- Blackwell.
- Kaplan, Robert S (2001), Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. In Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.). Landmark Essays on ESL Writing. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates, 11-25. (Reprinted from Language Learning 16, Kaplan R. B. (1966)
- Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education).
- Ellis, Donald G. & Maoz, Ifat (2002), “Cross-cultural argument interactions between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 30, pp.181-194.
- Suzuki, Shinobu (2010), “ Forms of written arguments: A comparison between Japan and the United States”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 651-660.
- Xue, Li. & Meng, Meng (2007), “A cross-cultural characterization of Chinese and English written discourse”, Intercultural Communication Studies,Vol. XVI, No. 3, pp.90-98.
- Nisbett, Richard E and Masuda, Takahiko (2003), “Culture and point of view”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.100, No.19, pp.11163- 11170.
- Joiner, Richard & Jones, Sarah (2003), “The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking”, International Journal of Education Research, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp.861-871.
- Jensen, Christine (2005), “Claim strength and argument structure in international research articles: A case study using Chinese, Ukrainian, and U.S. chemistry texts”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Kansas.
- Gudykunst, William B, Ting-Toomey (1988), “Verbalcommunication styles”. In Hendrik, B. Le Pair, R. Van Meurs, F , Korzilius, H & Damen, S (2005), “Does Style Matter? A cross-cultural study into the influence of differences in style dimensions on the persuasiveness in business newsletters in Great Britain and Netherland” proceedings of the Association for business communication 7th European Convention.
- http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/standpoint
Year 2012,
Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 347 - 356, 01.06.2012
Sharifah Shahnaz Bt Syed Husain
Hawa Rohany
Noorzan Haji Mohd Noor
References
- Asma Abdullah & Pedersen, Paul B,(2009),Understanding multicultural Malaysia. Delights, Puzzles & Irritations, Kuala Lumpur: Pearson. Prentice Hall.
- Crystal, David (2011),Internet linguistics, London-New York : Routledge. Francis & Taylor Group.
- Gumperz, John Joseph (1982), Discourse strategies: Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hall, Edward Twitchell (1976), Beyond culture: New York: Doubleday.
- Van Eemeren, Frans H, Grootendorst, Rob, & Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck (2002), Argumentation - Analysis, evaluation and presentation, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Van Eemeren, Frans H, Houtlosser, Peter, & Henkemans, Francisca Snoeck (2007), Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study, Netherland: Springer Publisher.
- Zarefsky, David (2005), Argumentation: The study of effective reasoning, Course guidebook, (2nd Ed.), Northwestern University: The Teaching Company.
- Scollon,Ron, Scollon, Suzanne Wong and Jones, Rodney H (2012), Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach (3rd edition),West Sussex:Willey- Blackwell.
- Kaplan, Robert S (2001), Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. In Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.). Landmark Essays on ESL Writing. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates, 11-25. (Reprinted from Language Learning 16, Kaplan R. B. (1966)
- Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education).
- Ellis, Donald G. & Maoz, Ifat (2002), “Cross-cultural argument interactions between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol. 30, pp.181-194.
- Suzuki, Shinobu (2010), “ Forms of written arguments: A comparison between Japan and the United States”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 651-660.
- Xue, Li. & Meng, Meng (2007), “A cross-cultural characterization of Chinese and English written discourse”, Intercultural Communication Studies,Vol. XVI, No. 3, pp.90-98.
- Nisbett, Richard E and Masuda, Takahiko (2003), “Culture and point of view”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.100, No.19, pp.11163- 11170.
- Joiner, Richard & Jones, Sarah (2003), “The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking”, International Journal of Education Research, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp.861-871.
- Jensen, Christine (2005), “Claim strength and argument structure in international research articles: A case study using Chinese, Ukrainian, and U.S. chemistry texts”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Kansas.
- Gudykunst, William B, Ting-Toomey (1988), “Verbalcommunication styles”. In Hendrik, B. Le Pair, R. Van Meurs, F , Korzilius, H & Damen, S (2005), “Does Style Matter? A cross-cultural study into the influence of differences in style dimensions on the persuasiveness in business newsletters in Great Britain and Netherland” proceedings of the Association for business communication 7th European Convention.
- http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/standpoint