INTER-CLUSTER PIPELINES: THE DRIVING FORCE OF KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Year 2011, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 405 - 414, 01.06.2011

Sadettin Keskin

Abstract

Even though cluster-based economic development has become more appearing, there has been much argument on various aspect of clusters. One going debate concerns some clusters generate high innovation associated with economic growth. The purpose of this stud is to illustrate the utility of inter-cluster pipelines for securing high knowledge creation and growth rates. As inter-cluster pipelines are based on social relations and ties, in addition to economic geography literature, we use social network theory (SNT). One advantage of SNT is that it enables to explore the processes of how pipelines are created and the potential value of them

Keywords

Clusters, Pipelines, Knowledge Creation

References

• Andersson, A. (1985), Creativity and Regional Development. Papers in Regional Science, 56(1):5-20
• Barabási, A.L. (2003), Linked, How Everything is Connected to Everything
• Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. London:Penguin Books Ltd.
• Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell (2002), Cluster and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation. DRUID Working Paper, No.02-12
• Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes. Massachusetts:Harvard University Press
• Carrington, P., J. Scott, and S.Wasserman (2005), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York:Cambridge University Press
• Granovetter, M. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380
• Gertler, M. S. (2003), Tacit Knowledge and Economic Geography of Context, or the Undefinable Tacitness of Being (There). Journal of Economic Geography, 3:75-99
• Guilliani, E. (2005), Cluster absorptive capacity, Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind? European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3):269- 288
• Jack, S. (2005), The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6)
• Krugman, P. (1991), Geography and trade. Massachusetts:MIT Press
• Malmberg, A., Ö. Sölvell & I. Zander (1996), Spatial Clustering, local accumulation of knowledge and firm competitiveness. Geografiska annaler, 78 B(2):85-97
• Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics. London:Macmillan
• Maskell, P., H. Bathelt & A. Malmberg (2004), Temporary Clusters and Knowledge Creation: The Effect of International Trade Fairs, Conventions and Other Professional Gatherings. SPACES 2004-04
• Owen-Smith, J. and WW. Powell (2004), Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Studies, 15:5-21
• Perry-Smith, J. E. & C. E. Shalley (2003), The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28:89- 106
• Porter, M. E. (1998), On Competition. Boston:HBS Press
• Rosenberg, N. (1982), Perspective on technology. Cambridge: CUP
• Sorenson, O. (2003), Social Networks, Informational Complexity and Industrial Geography. In Fornal, D. and C. Zellner (eds.), The role of Labour Mobility and Informal Networks for Knowledge Transfer, Amsterdam:Kluver Academic Publishers
• Trippl, M., F. Todling & L. Lengauer (2009), Knowledge Sourcing Beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector. Economic Geography, 85:443-462