In recent years, France has opposed full EU membership for Turkey while Britain has been one of
the staunchest supporters of Turkey's EU accession bid. This paper argues that this can be
explained by fundamentally different conceptions of the EU in the two countries, based in turn on
differences in national conceptions of state and nation.
The paper thus analyses recent French and British discourse on the EU and, particularly, on
Turkey's accession bid, according to Sjursen's (2007) framework of three idealised visions of the
EU. These are firstly, the EU as a problem-solving entity, secundly as a values-based community
based on a common cultural identity and finally as a post-national union underscored by
'universal' rights such as democracy and human rights
Other ID | JA69HH79YC |
---|---|
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 1, 2010 |
Published in Issue | Year 2010 Volume: 2 Issue: 2 |