FEMINISM INDUSTRY: AN INQUIRY INTO THE CORPORATE APPROPRIATION OF WOMEN’S MOVEMENT

Abstract

A growing number of corporations started to develop product lines, advertising campaigns and new media engagement plans using messages and imagery around feminism and women’s movement in the recent years. As part of this new trend, a large number of global corporations adopted a seemingly feminist perspective by capitalizing on women’s empowerment, the body positive movement, intersectionality and other similar concepts from the feminist discourse of our day. Even though these high budget projects manage to appeal to larger sections of the world population than organically founded groups within women’s movement, the article argues that the corporate appropriation of feminism leads to decontextualization of women’s issues. The article aims to analyze the industrialization of feminism and the dynamics behind the creation of this emerging industry. The article consults in semiotic analysis of a recent ad campaign to serve as an example to offer a perspective on the subject. Concordantly, the textual and visual material of the commercial film launched by Nike Turkey on February 20, 2017 are analyzed. The findings of the article offer an observation of the appropriation of feminist discourse and the transformation of feminist values into profit values

Keywords

• Appropriation,Feminism,Patriarchy,Advertising,Capitalism

References

1. Bianet, 2017. “Kadınlar Daha Çok Çalışıyor, Daha Az Kazanıyor”. [online] Available at: http://bianet.org/bianet/kadin/184255-kadinlar-daha-cok-calisiyor-daha-az-kazaniyor [Accessed on 1 October
2. Coloribus, 2017. This is us. by Wieden + Kennedy Amsterdam for Nike. [online] Available at
3. [Accessed 1 October
4. Connell, R.W., 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press in assoc. with Basil Blackwell.
5. German, L., 1995. `Babes, Barbie and the battle of the sexes'. Socialist Review, [e-journal], 185. Available at
6. [Accessed 1 October 2017]
7. Gill, R., 2008. Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism &
8. Psychology, [e-journal], 18(35). Available at: Accessed 1 October 2017]

9. Greimas, A.J., 1966. Sémantique structurale recherche de méthode. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
10. Hjelmslev, L., 1968. Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Paris: Minuit.
11. Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T.W., 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Reprint 2002, edited by G.S. Noerr, translated from German by E. Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Kennedy, S., 2013. Marxism and Feminism in an Age of Neoliberalism. Irish Marxist Review, [e-journal] 2(7).
13. Available at: [Accessed 1 October 2017]
14. Marcuse, H., 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Reprint 2007. New York: Routledge.
15. Özbudun, S., 2007. Neo-Liberalizm ile Ataerkinin ‘Dansı’. In: S. Özbudun, C. Sarı and T. Demirer. Küreselleşme, Kadın ve ‘Yeni’ Ataerki. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
16. Power, N., 2009. One Dimensional Woman. Winchester: O Books.
17. Reed, E., 1969. Problems of Women’s Liberation. New York: Merit Publishers.
18. Ritzer, G., 2010. Globalization: a basic text. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
19. Saussure, F., 1973. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
20. Sheth, S. and Gould, S., 2017. 5 charts show how much more men make than women. Business Insider, [online] 8
21. March. Available at: [Accessed 1 October
22. World Economic Forum, 2016. Global Gender Gap Report 2016. [online] Available at
23. [Accessed 1 October
24. Youtube, Nike: This is us, 2017. [online video] Available at: Accessed 1 October 2017]