BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 5 - 18, 01.12.2018

Elızabeth Ekren

Abstract

References

  • Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agier, M., 2002. Between war and city: Towards an urban anthropology of refugee camps. Ethnography, 3 (3), p. –341.
  • Arendt, H., 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd ed. Cleveland: World Publishing Co., Meridian Books.
  • Asylum Information Database (AIDA), 2017. Conditions in Reception Facilities (Germany). Berlin
  • Informationsverbund Asyl und Migration. Bakewell, O., 2010. Some reflections on structure and agency in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36 (10), p. 1689–1708.
  • Betts, A., et al., 2016. Refugee Economies: Forced Displacement and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Betts, A., Bloom, L., and Omata, N., 2012. Humanitarian Innovation and Refugee Protection. Oxford: University of
  • Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre. Betts, A., Bloom, L., and Weaver, N., 2015. Refugee Innovation: Humanitarian Innovation that Starts with
  • Communities. Oxford: University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre. Betts, A., and Collier, P., 2017. Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System. London: Penguin Books.
  • Brücker, H., et al., 2016a. Geflüchtete Menschen in Deutschland: eine Qualitative Befragung. Nürnberg: Instituts für
  • Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. Brücker, H., Rother, N., and Schupp, J., 2016b. IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten: Überblick und erste
  • Ergebnisse. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF), 2016. Asylgeschäftsstatistik für den Monat Dezember 2016.
  • Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Certeau, M.d., 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ciabarri, L., 2008. Productivity of refugee camps: Social and political dynamics from the Somaliland-Ethiopia border (1988–2001), Africa Spectrum, 43 (1), p. 67–90.
  • Darling, J., 2009. Becoming bare life: Asylum, hospitality, and the politics of encampment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (4), p. 649–665.
  • Dellenbaugh, M., et al., eds., 2015. Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Gütersloh: Birkhäuser.
  • Domanski, M., 1997. Insights from refugee experience: a background paper on temporary protection. In: J.C.
  • Hathaway, ed. Reconceiving International Refugee Law. The Hague: Brill Nijhoff, p. 20–34. Easton-Calabria, E.E., 2015. From bottom-up to top-down: The ‘pre-history’ of refugee livelihoods assistance from to 1979. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28 (3), p. 412–436.
  • Edwards, A., and Dobbs, L.R., 2014. World Refugee Day: Global Forced Displacement Tops 50 Million for First Time in Post-World War II Era [online]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2014/6/53a155bc6/world- refugee-day-global-forced-displacement-tops-50-million-first-time.html [Accessed 8 August 2017].
  • Ek, R., 2006. Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the camp: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler, Series B
  • Human Geography, 88 (4), p. 363–386. EuroStat, 2016. Asylum Statistics [online]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics [Accessed 28 January 2017].
  • Foucault, M., 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Gibson, N.C., 2015. The ethical struggle to be human: A shack dwellers movement in South Africa. In: D. Bollier and S. Helfrich, eds. Patterns of Commoning [Kindle DX version]. Amityville, New York: Common Strategies Group.
  • Available from: http://www.amazon.com [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Goffman, E., 1961. On the characteristics of total institutions. In: D.R. Cressey and J.V. Galtung, eds. The Prison
  • Studies in Institutional Organization and Change. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, p. 15–67. Hajj, N., 2014. Institutional formation in transitional settings. Comparative Politics, 46 (4), p. 399–418.
  • Hanafi, S., and Long, T., 2010. Governance, governmentalities, and the state of exception in the Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23 (2), p. 134–159.
  • Hess, C., and Ostrom, E., eds., 2005. Understanding Knowledge As a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge
  • Massachusetts: MIT Press. Hodgson, G.M., 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1), p. 1–25.
  • Holzer, E., 2013. What happens to law in a refugee camp? Law & Society Review, 47 (4), p. 837–872.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2002. Livelihoods in conflict: the pursuit of livelihoods by refugees and the impact on the human security of host communities. International Migration, 40 (5), p. 95–123.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2005. The Economic Life of Refugees. Bloomfield, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2006. Refugees and asylum seekers in urban areas: A livelihoods perspective. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19 (3), p. 273–286.
  • Jacobsen, K., and Landau, L.B., 2003. The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27 (3), p. 185–206.
  • Kaiser, T., 2006. Between a camp and a hard place: Rights, livelihood and experiences of the local settlement system for long-term refugees in Uganda. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44 (04), p. 597–621.
  • Kibreab, G., 2004. Pulling the wool over the eyes of the strangers: Refugee deceit and trickery in institutionalized settings. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17 (1), p. 1–26.
  • King, A., 2010. The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 61 (1), p. 253–260.
  • Kingston, C., and Caballero, G., 2009. Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, (02), p. 151–180.
  • La Chaux, M. de, and Haugh, H., 2014. Entrepreneurship and innovation: How institutional voids shape economic opportunities in refugee camps. Humanitarian Innovation Conference. Oxford, United Kingdom, 19–20 July 2014.
  • Oxford: University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Center. Lewis, H., 2007. Destitution in Leeds: The Experiences of People Seeking Asylum and Supporting Agencies. York
  • Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Loescher, G., et al., 2003. Responding to the Asylum and Access Challenge: An Agenda for Comprehensive
  • Engagement in Protracted Refugee Situations. Brussels: European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Long, N., 2001. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
  • Lutz, M., 2015. Uncommon claims to the commons: Homeless tent cities in the US. In: M. Dellenbaugh, et al., eds.
  • Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Gütersloh: Birkhäuser, p. 101–116. McDowell, C., and Haan, A.d., 1997. Migration and Sustainable Livelihoods: A Critical Review of the Literature.
  • Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Minca, C., 2015. Geographies of the camp. Political Geography, 49, p. 74–83.
  • North, D.C., 1990. A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (4), p. 355–367.
  • North, D.C., 1994. Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84 (3), p. 359–368.
  • North, D.C., 1995. The new institutional economics and Third World development. In: J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C.M.
  • Lewis, eds. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, p. 17–26. Oka, R.C., 2014. Coping with the refugee wait: the role of consumption, normalcy, and dignity in refugee lives at
  • Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. American Anthropologist, 116 (1), p. 23–37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017. Who Bears the Cost of Integrating
  • Refugees?. Paris: Migration and Development, OECD. Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, E., and Hess, C., 2005. A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In: C. Hess and E. Ostrom, eds.
  • Papadopoulos, D., and Tsianos, V., 2007. The autonomy of migration: The animals of undocumented mobility. In: A.
  • Hickey-Moody and P. Malins, eds. Deleuzian Encounters: Studies in Contemporary Social Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 223–235. Pejovich, S., 1999. The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic evelopment. Journal of Markets and Morality, 2 (2), p. 164–181.
  • Puggioni, R., 2005. Refugees, institutional invisibility, and self-help strategies: Evaluating Kurdish experience in
  • Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 18 (3), p. 319–339. Pugilese, J., 2002. Penal asylum: Refugees, ethics, hospitality. Borderlands e-Journal [online], 1 (1). Available from: http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol1no1_2002/pugliese.html [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Ruddick, W., 2015. How the Bangla-Pesa tapped the value of an informal community. In: D. Bollier and S. Helfrich, eds. Patterns of Commoning [Kindle DX version]. Amityville, New York: Common Strategies Group. Available from: http://www.amazon.com [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Salvatici, S., 2012. Help the people to help themselves: UNRRA relief workers and European displaced persons.
  • Journal of Refugee Studies, 25 (3), p. 428–451. Schumpeter, J.A., 1983. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, N.J., London: Transaction Books.
  • Sewell, W.H., 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), p. 1–29.
  • Skarbek, D., 2016. Covenants without the sword?: Comparing prison self-governance globally. American Political
  • Science Review, 110 (4), p. 845–862. Stadt Köln, 2015. Flüchtlinge in Köln [online]. Available from: http://www.stadt-koeln.de/leben-in- koeln/soziales/koeln-hilft-fluechtlingen/fluechtlinge-koeln [Accessed 21 March 2017].
  • Tidd, J., and Bessant, J., 2005. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turner, S., 2016. What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29 (2), p. 139–148.
  • United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), 2006. Refugee Livelihoods: A Review of the Evidence. Geneva
  • Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, UNHCR. United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), 2017. Figures at a Glance [online]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html [Accessed 24 July 2017].
  • Werker, E., 2007. Refugee camp economies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20 (3), p. 461–480.
  • Zembylas, M., 2010. Agamben’s theory of biopower and immigrants/refugees/asylum seekers: discourses of citizenship and the implications for curriculum theorizing. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26 (2), p. 31–45.
  • Zylinska, J., 2004. The universal acts: Judith Butler and the biopolitics of immigration. Cultural Studies, 18 (4), p. –537.

​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 5 - 18, 01.12.2018

Elızabeth Ekren

Abstract

To what extent can the everyday innovations of refugees address the governance and resource gaps created by formal, legal institutions of the state? In their daily lives, refugees face unique institutional conditions that create environmental distortions, compromise livelihood resources, and potentially diminish long-term socioeconomic well-being. Theories in refugee literature debate the capacity refugees have to respond to these conditions. Some scholars contend that refugees have little power to overcome the state biopolitical structures that force depravity and eliminate rights. Others argue that refugees possess the agency to alter environmental, communal, and institutional aspects of everyday life to improve elements of their own well-being. The purpose of this paper is to contextualize my own research within the landscape of this ongoing debate and propose how new institutional analysis may be used as a tool to evaluate refugees’ agency for change. I explain how I will apply this analysis using a case study of everyday refugee life in two refugee accommodation centers in Cologne, Germany. This paper contributes to the theoretical debate about refugee agency by discussing how institutional analysis may help to understand how refugees overcome the various constraints that govern their existence through novel manipulations and everyday innovations of multiple aspects of their living spaces

References

  • Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Agier, M., 2002. Between war and city: Towards an urban anthropology of refugee camps. Ethnography, 3 (3), p. –341.
  • Arendt, H., 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd ed. Cleveland: World Publishing Co., Meridian Books.
  • Asylum Information Database (AIDA), 2017. Conditions in Reception Facilities (Germany). Berlin
  • Informationsverbund Asyl und Migration. Bakewell, O., 2010. Some reflections on structure and agency in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36 (10), p. 1689–1708.
  • Betts, A., et al., 2016. Refugee Economies: Forced Displacement and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Betts, A., Bloom, L., and Omata, N., 2012. Humanitarian Innovation and Refugee Protection. Oxford: University of
  • Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre. Betts, A., Bloom, L., and Weaver, N., 2015. Refugee Innovation: Humanitarian Innovation that Starts with
  • Communities. Oxford: University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Centre. Betts, A., and Collier, P., 2017. Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System. London: Penguin Books.
  • Brücker, H., et al., 2016a. Geflüchtete Menschen in Deutschland: eine Qualitative Befragung. Nürnberg: Instituts für
  • Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. Brücker, H., Rother, N., and Schupp, J., 2016b. IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten: Überblick und erste
  • Ergebnisse. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF), 2016. Asylgeschäftsstatistik für den Monat Dezember 2016.
  • Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Certeau, M.d., 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ciabarri, L., 2008. Productivity of refugee camps: Social and political dynamics from the Somaliland-Ethiopia border (1988–2001), Africa Spectrum, 43 (1), p. 67–90.
  • Darling, J., 2009. Becoming bare life: Asylum, hospitality, and the politics of encampment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (4), p. 649–665.
  • Dellenbaugh, M., et al., eds., 2015. Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Gütersloh: Birkhäuser.
  • Domanski, M., 1997. Insights from refugee experience: a background paper on temporary protection. In: J.C.
  • Hathaway, ed. Reconceiving International Refugee Law. The Hague: Brill Nijhoff, p. 20–34. Easton-Calabria, E.E., 2015. From bottom-up to top-down: The ‘pre-history’ of refugee livelihoods assistance from to 1979. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28 (3), p. 412–436.
  • Edwards, A., and Dobbs, L.R., 2014. World Refugee Day: Global Forced Displacement Tops 50 Million for First Time in Post-World War II Era [online]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2014/6/53a155bc6/world- refugee-day-global-forced-displacement-tops-50-million-first-time.html [Accessed 8 August 2017].
  • Ek, R., 2006. Giorgio Agamben and the spatialities of the camp: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler, Series B
  • Human Geography, 88 (4), p. 363–386. EuroStat, 2016. Asylum Statistics [online]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics [Accessed 28 January 2017].
  • Foucault, M., 1978. The History of Sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Gibson, N.C., 2015. The ethical struggle to be human: A shack dwellers movement in South Africa. In: D. Bollier and S. Helfrich, eds. Patterns of Commoning [Kindle DX version]. Amityville, New York: Common Strategies Group.
  • Available from: http://www.amazon.com [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Goffman, E., 1961. On the characteristics of total institutions. In: D.R. Cressey and J.V. Galtung, eds. The Prison
  • Studies in Institutional Organization and Change. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, p. 15–67. Hajj, N., 2014. Institutional formation in transitional settings. Comparative Politics, 46 (4), p. 399–418.
  • Hanafi, S., and Long, T., 2010. Governance, governmentalities, and the state of exception in the Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23 (2), p. 134–159.
  • Hess, C., and Ostrom, E., eds., 2005. Understanding Knowledge As a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge
  • Massachusetts: MIT Press. Hodgson, G.M., 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1), p. 1–25.
  • Holzer, E., 2013. What happens to law in a refugee camp? Law & Society Review, 47 (4), p. 837–872.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2002. Livelihoods in conflict: the pursuit of livelihoods by refugees and the impact on the human security of host communities. International Migration, 40 (5), p. 95–123.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2005. The Economic Life of Refugees. Bloomfield, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.
  • Jacobsen, K., 2006. Refugees and asylum seekers in urban areas: A livelihoods perspective. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19 (3), p. 273–286.
  • Jacobsen, K., and Landau, L.B., 2003. The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27 (3), p. 185–206.
  • Kaiser, T., 2006. Between a camp and a hard place: Rights, livelihood and experiences of the local settlement system for long-term refugees in Uganda. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44 (04), p. 597–621.
  • Kibreab, G., 2004. Pulling the wool over the eyes of the strangers: Refugee deceit and trickery in institutionalized settings. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17 (1), p. 1–26.
  • King, A., 2010. The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 61 (1), p. 253–260.
  • Kingston, C., and Caballero, G., 2009. Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, (02), p. 151–180.
  • La Chaux, M. de, and Haugh, H., 2014. Entrepreneurship and innovation: How institutional voids shape economic opportunities in refugee camps. Humanitarian Innovation Conference. Oxford, United Kingdom, 19–20 July 2014.
  • Oxford: University of Oxford, Refugee Studies Center. Lewis, H., 2007. Destitution in Leeds: The Experiences of People Seeking Asylum and Supporting Agencies. York
  • Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Loescher, G., et al., 2003. Responding to the Asylum and Access Challenge: An Agenda for Comprehensive
  • Engagement in Protracted Refugee Situations. Brussels: European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Long, N., 2001. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
  • Lutz, M., 2015. Uncommon claims to the commons: Homeless tent cities in the US. In: M. Dellenbaugh, et al., eds.
  • Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Gütersloh: Birkhäuser, p. 101–116. McDowell, C., and Haan, A.d., 1997. Migration and Sustainable Livelihoods: A Critical Review of the Literature.
  • Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. Minca, C., 2015. Geographies of the camp. Political Geography, 49, p. 74–83.
  • North, D.C., 1990. A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2 (4), p. 355–367.
  • North, D.C., 1994. Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84 (3), p. 359–368.
  • North, D.C., 1995. The new institutional economics and Third World development. In: J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C.M.
  • Lewis, eds. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, p. 17–26. Oka, R.C., 2014. Coping with the refugee wait: the role of consumption, normalcy, and dignity in refugee lives at
  • Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. American Anthropologist, 116 (1), p. 23–37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017. Who Bears the Cost of Integrating
  • Refugees?. Paris: Migration and Development, OECD. Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, E., and Hess, C., 2005. A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In: C. Hess and E. Ostrom, eds.
  • Papadopoulos, D., and Tsianos, V., 2007. The autonomy of migration: The animals of undocumented mobility. In: A.
  • Hickey-Moody and P. Malins, eds. Deleuzian Encounters: Studies in Contemporary Social Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 223–235. Pejovich, S., 1999. The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic evelopment. Journal of Markets and Morality, 2 (2), p. 164–181.
  • Puggioni, R., 2005. Refugees, institutional invisibility, and self-help strategies: Evaluating Kurdish experience in
  • Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 18 (3), p. 319–339. Pugilese, J., 2002. Penal asylum: Refugees, ethics, hospitality. Borderlands e-Journal [online], 1 (1). Available from: http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol1no1_2002/pugliese.html [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Ruddick, W., 2015. How the Bangla-Pesa tapped the value of an informal community. In: D. Bollier and S. Helfrich, eds. Patterns of Commoning [Kindle DX version]. Amityville, New York: Common Strategies Group. Available from: http://www.amazon.com [Accessed 16 August 2017].
  • Salvatici, S., 2012. Help the people to help themselves: UNRRA relief workers and European displaced persons.
  • Journal of Refugee Studies, 25 (3), p. 428–451. Schumpeter, J.A., 1983. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, N.J., London: Transaction Books.
  • Sewell, W.H., 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), p. 1–29.
  • Skarbek, D., 2016. Covenants without the sword?: Comparing prison self-governance globally. American Political
  • Science Review, 110 (4), p. 845–862. Stadt Köln, 2015. Flüchtlinge in Köln [online]. Available from: http://www.stadt-koeln.de/leben-in- koeln/soziales/koeln-hilft-fluechtlingen/fluechtlinge-koeln [Accessed 21 March 2017].
  • Tidd, J., and Bessant, J., 2005. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. rd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turner, S., 2016. What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29 (2), p. 139–148.
  • United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), 2006. Refugee Livelihoods: A Review of the Evidence. Geneva
  • Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, UNHCR. United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), 2017. Figures at a Glance [online]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html [Accessed 24 July 2017].
  • Werker, E., 2007. Refugee camp economies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20 (3), p. 461–480.
  • Zembylas, M., 2010. Agamben’s theory of biopower and immigrants/refugees/asylum seekers: discourses of citizenship and the implications for curriculum theorizing. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26 (2), p. 31–45.
  • Zylinska, J., 2004. The universal acts: Judith Butler and the biopolitics of immigration. Cultural Studies, 18 (4), p. –537.
There are 70 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Elızabeth Ekren This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Ekren, E. (2018). ​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 5-18.
AMA Ekren E. ​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. December 2018;3(2):5-18.
Chicago Ekren, Elızabeth. “​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3, no. 2 (December 2018): 5-18.
EndNote Ekren E (December 1, 2018) ​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3 2 5–18.
IEEE E. Ekren, “​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 5–18, 2018.
ISNAD Ekren, Elızabeth. “​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies 3/2 (December 2018), 5-18.
JAMA Ekren E. ​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. 2018;3:5–18.
MLA Ekren, Elızabeth. “​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, 2018, pp. 5-18.
Vancouver Ekren E. ​HOW CAN THEORIES OF INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND EVERYDAY INNOVATION REVEAL AGENCY FOR CHANGE IN REFUGEE COMMUNITIES?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies. 2018;3(2):5-18.