EN
ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS
Abstract
Ordering of claim size risks can be done by stochastic dominance, stop-loss dominance andseveral other modalities of stochastic orders for decision making under uncertainty. Emergence of risks can bedeteected in terms of some interdependent variables and factors such as risk reserves and premium amounts.Risk ordering must be done by models that take account of this interdependence.This paper discusses some major stochastic order modalities for comparisons of risks and introduces anew risk ordering criterion in terms or record values of claim size sequences. Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches
Keywords
References
- Ahsanullah, M. (1985), Record Statistics. Nova Scince Publisher
- Bairamov, I.G., (1997) Some distribution free properties of statistics based on record values and charecterization of the distributions through a record, Journal of Applies Statistical Science, Vol.5 No.1 pp.17-25.
- Daykin, C.D., Pentikainen, T., Pesonen, E., (1995), Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries. Chapman and Hall
- Goldie C., Rogers L.C.G., (1984), The k-record process are iid. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw Gebiete Vol. 67, 197-211.
- Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Heerwaarden, A.E., Bauwelinckx, T., (1990), Effective Actuarial Methods, North Holland.
- Gupta R.C., (1984), Relations between order statistics and record values and some charecterization results. Journal of Applied Probability, 21, 425-430.
- Heilmann W.R., (1986), Fundamentals of Risk Theory, VVW Karlsruhe
- Mosler K., Scarsini M. (1991), Stochastic Orders and Decision Under Risk, IMS Lecture Notes-Mongraph Series, Vol.19
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
January 1, 2002
Submission Date
January 1, 2002
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2002 Volume: 5 Number: 1
APA
Gebizlioglu, O. L., & Tank., F. (2002). ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association, 5(1), 7-13. https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX
AMA
1.Gebizlioglu OL, Tank. F. ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. IJTSA. 2002;5(1):7-13. https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX
Chicago
Gebizlioglu, Omer L., and Fatih Tank. 2002. “ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS”. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association 5 (1): 7-13. https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX.
EndNote
Gebizlioglu OL, Tank. F (January 1, 2002) ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association 5 1 7–13.
IEEE
[1]O. L. Gebizlioglu and F. Tank., “ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS”, IJTSA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–13, Jan. 2002, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX
ISNAD
Gebizlioglu, Omer L. - Tank., Fatih. “ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS”. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association 5/1 (January 1, 2002): 7-13. https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX.
JAMA
1.Gebizlioglu OL, Tank. F. ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. IJTSA. 2002;5:7–13.
MLA
Gebizlioglu, Omer L., and Fatih Tank. “ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS”. Istatistik Journal of The Turkish Statistical Association, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 7-13, https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX.
Vancouver
1.Omer L. Gebizlioglu, Fatih Tank. ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. IJTSA [Internet]. 2002 Jan. 1;5(1):7-13. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA72ZK56CX