Research Article

Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring

Volume: 1 Number: 3 December 22, 2018
  • Aliakbar Hedayati *

Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring

Öz

A large number of biomarkers and indicator organisms have been suggested for the assessment of ecotoxicity of man-made compounds on aquatic environments. The physiological and biochemical indices in fishes are sensitive for detecting potential toxic effects, and also are obvious from the same reports that studies on the impact of pollutants on the physiological and biochemical status of aquatic organisms. In an attempt to define and measure the effect of pollutants on an ecosystem, biomarkers have attracted a lot of interest. The underlying principle of the biomarker approach is the analysis of an organism’s physiological or biochemical response to pollutant exposure. The measurement of biochemical and physiological parameters is a diagnostic tool commonly used in aquatic toxicology and bio-monitoring, so Hematological and immunological parameters are suitable biomarkers in mercury studies. During stress, fish respond in a number of ways in order to regain homeostasis and two important physiological processes which are modulated when fish are exposed to stress, are hormonal status and immune function. In this paper, our previous research's on effects of different pollutants (heavy metals, pesticides, nano particles, organic pollutants and etc.) on many fish species (marine and freshwater) was studied to detect new biomarkers (enzymatic, hormonal, immunological, hematological, histopathological and etc.) for water quality monitoring. In this study we examined markers of hematology, enzyme, hormone and histopathology in different fishes. The aim of this study was to test a multi-trial biomarker approach for evaluating toxicological risk due to the major toxicant in the water, using fishes as bio-indicator organism. The main objectives of this researches were: to identify the tissues and biological materials useful for biomarker studies; to evaluate various biochemical biomarkers in different tissues; to identify the most suitable biomarkers for evaluating chemical stress due to the contaminants explored in this study. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

  1. Abou EL-Naga, E. H.; EL-Moselhy, K. M.; Hamed, M. A. 2005. Toxicity of cadmium and copper and their effect on some biochemical parameters of marine fish Mugil seheli. Egyptian. J. Aquat. Res., 31 (2), 60-71.
  2. Adhikari, S., Sarkar, B., Chatterjee, A., Mahapatra, C.T., Ayyappan, S., 2004. Effects of cypermethrin and carbofuran on certain hematological parameters and prediction of their recovery in a freshwater teleost; Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 58, 220–226.
  3. Affonso, E.G., Polez, V.L.P., Correˆ a, C.F., Mazon, A.F., Araujo, M.R.R., Moraes, G., Ratin, F.T., 2002. Blood parameters and metabolites in the teleosts fish Colossoma macropomum exposed to sulfide or hypoxia. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 133, 375–382.
  4. Basa, Siraj, P.; Usha Rani, A. 2003. Cadmium induced antioxidant defense mechanism in freshwater teleost Oreochromis mossambicus (Tilapia). Eco. Toxicol. Environ. Saf., 56 (2), 218 – 221.
  5. Blaise, C., Gagne´, F., Pellerin, J., Hansen, P.D., Trottier, S., 2002. Molluscan shellfish biomarker study of the Quebec, Canada aguenay fjord with the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria. Environmental Toxicology 17, 170–186.
  6. Boudou, A., Ribeyre, F., 1997. Aquatic ecotoxicology: from the ecosystem to the cellular and molecular levels. Environ. Health Perspect. 105 (Suppl. 1), 21-35.
  7. Boening, D. W. 2000. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere 40 :13351351.
  8. Daintith, J., 1996. A Dictionary of Chemistry, third ed. Oxford University Press, New York.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Aliakbar Hedayati * This is me

Publication Date

December 22, 2018

Submission Date

August 1, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 1, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 1 Number: 3

APA
Hedayati, A. (2018). Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research, 1(3), 63-69. https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA
AMA
1.Hedayati A. Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research. 2018;1(3):63-69. https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA
Chicago
Hedayati, Aliakbar. 2018. “Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring”. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research 1 (3): 63-69. https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA.
EndNote
Hedayati A (December 1, 2018) Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research 1 3 63–69.
IEEE
[1]A. Hedayati, “Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring”, International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 63–69, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA
ISNAD
Hedayati, Aliakbar. “Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring”. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research 1/3 (December 1, 2018): 63-69. https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA.
JAMA
1.Hedayati A. Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research. 2018;1:63–69.
MLA
Hedayati, Aliakbar. “Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring”. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research, vol. 1, no. 3, Dec. 2018, pp. 63-69, https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA.
Vancouver
1.Aliakbar Hedayati. Fish Biomarkers, Suitable Tools For Water Quality Monitoring. International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;1(3):63-9. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA53SA29XA