Öğretmenler için İçsel Motivasyon Faktörleri: Motivasyon 3.0 Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi, Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Year 2023, , 863 - 884, 28.10.2023

Seher Yastıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1347647

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, eğitim örgütlerinde öğretmenlerin içsel motivasyon deneyimleri altında yatan faktörleri ortaya koymak adına; Daniel Pink tarafından Harry Harlow ve Edward Deci’nin çalışmalarından esinlenerek ileri sürülen Motivasyon 3.0 diğer bir ifade ile içsel motivasyon yaklaşımı temelinde ‘Öğretmenler için Motivasyon 3.0 Ölçeği’ni geliştirmek, geçerliliğini ve güvenilirliğini test etmektir. Bu amaçla, ölçek geliştirme sürecinde sıralı üç çalışma yürütülmüştür. Birinci çalışmada alan yazından faydalanılarak ve öğretmenlerle gerçekleştirilen yapılandırılmış mülakatlardan elde edilen nitel bulgular kullanılarak madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Kapsam geçerliliği için alan uzmanlarından ve ölçeğin hedef kitlesi olan öğretmenlerden görüş alınmış ve taslak ölçme aracı oluşturulmuştur. Nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak yürütülen Çalışma 2 ve Çalışma 3’te ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim okullarında çalışan toplam 779 öğretmenden elde edilen veriler üzerinden yapılan keşfedici, doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri, güvenilirlik ve ilişki analizleri ile ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği, güvenilirliği ve eş zamanlı geçerliliğine dair kanıtlar elde edilmiştir. Nihai durumda anlamlı amaç, uzmanlık (ustalık) ve özerlik olmak üzere 3 faktör ve 29 maddeden oluşan, öğretmenlerin içsel motivasyon düzeylerinin ve faktörlerinin belirlenmesinde kullanılabilecek ölçme aracı alan yazına kazandırılmıştır. Bununla birlikte, öğretmenlerin hem duygusal iyi oluşunu hem de öğrenciye yönelik ekstra rol davranışını daha fazla arttıran boyutun uzmanlık (ustalık) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

İçsel Motivasyon, Motivasyon 3.0, Öğretmenler, Ölçek Geliştirme

Intrinsic Motivation Factors for Teachers: Development, Validity and Reliability Study of Motivation 3.0 Scale

Abstract

The study aims at revealing the factors underlying teachers' intrinsic motivation experiences in educational organizations testing the development, validity, and reliability of the Motivation 3.0 Scale for Teachers based on the intrinsic motivation approach, which originated by Daniel Pink and the works of Harry Harlow and Edward Deci. Three sequential studies have been carried out during the scale development process within the aim of the study. In the first study, an item pool has been created by benefiting from the literature and findings obtained from the structured interviews with the teachers. For content validity, opinions have been taken from the experts of the fields and teachers, who are the target group of the scale, and a draft measurement tool has been created. In studies 2 and 3, which have been conducted by using the quantitative research method, data obtained from a total of 779 teachers working in primary, secondary, and high schools have been subjected to exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses for construct validity, reliability analysis and relationship analyses to obtain evidence for the concurrent validity of the scale. Consequently, the scale, which consists of 3 factors as meaningful purpose, expertise (mastery), and autonomy with 29 items has been added to the literature to determine teachers' intrinsic motivation levels and factors. In addition, expertise (mastery) has been found to be the dimension that increases both the emotional well-being of the teachers and extra-role behavior toward the students.

Keywords

Intrinsic Motivation, Motivation 3.0, Teachers, Scale Development

References

• Altan, M. Z. ve Özmusul, M. (2022). Geleceğin Türkiye’sinde öğretmen refahı: Öğretmenlik meslek kanununun kayıp parçası. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 24-42.
• Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W. ve Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.92
• Argon, T. ve Ertürk, R. (2013). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin içsel motivasyonları ve örgütsel kimliğe yönelik algıları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(2), 159-179.
• Ateş, Ö. T. ve İhtiyaroğlu, N. (2019). Yetişkin motivasyon ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 611-620.
• Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
• Barghani, Z. S. (2021). The role of professional development on teachers' organizational citizenship behavior and motivation. Online Submission.
• Carter, S. M., Shih, P., Williams, J., Degeling, C. ve Mooney-Somers, J. (2021). Conducting qualitative research online: Challenges and solutions. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14(6), 711-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w
• Chadha, N. K. (2021). Uygulamalı psikometri (1. Baskı, S. Şen çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. ve Turner L. A. (2020). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz (3. Baskı, A. Aypay, Çev. Ed.). Anı Yayıncılık.
• Coggins, C. ve Diffenbaugh, P. K. (2013). Teachers with Drive. Educational Leadership, 71(2), 42-45.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (2. Baskı, S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.). Eğiten Kitap Yayıncılık.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching. M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of Flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi içinde (s. 173–87). Springer.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032355
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Perspectives in Social Psychology.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2014). Autonomy and need satisfaction in close relationships: Relationships motivation theory. N. Weinstein (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and applications içinde (s. 53–73). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_3
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. ve Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. ve Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6
• DeVellis R. F. (2017). Scale development. SAGE Publications.
• Dündar, S., Özutku, H. ve Taşpınar, F. (2007). İçsel ve dışsal motivasyon araçlarının işgörenlerin motivasyonu üzerindeki etkisi: Ampirik bir inceleme. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (2), 105-119.
• Eurydice (2018). Teaching careers in Europe: Access, progression and support. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
• Frankl, V. (2020). İnsanın anlam arayışı (69. Baskı, S. Budak Çev.). Okuyan Us Yayıncılık.
• Gagné, M. ve Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E. ve Malorni, A. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., … ve Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B. ve Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsp.2005.11.001
• Harlow, H. F. (1953). Motivation as a factor in the acquisition of new responses. J. S. Brown, et al. (Ed.), Current theory and research on motivation içinde (p. 24–49). University of Nebraska Press.
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational research methods, 1(1), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
• InnerActive Leadership Associates, (2011). Motivation self assesment. https://inneractiveleadership.ca
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
• Kant, S. ve Asefa, K. (2022). Transformational educational leadership effect on staff members engagement: The mediating impact of intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), 1(2), 35-49. 2815-9330
• Karasek Jr, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
• Kılıç, Y. ve Yılmaz, E. (2019). İçsel, dışsal ve yönetsel faktörler bağlamında Öğretmen Motivasyon Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 77-91.
• Kılıklı, M. ve Çarıkçı, İ. H. (2019). Ekstra rol davranışı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(4), 831-846. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/53006/706066
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
• Köse, E. K., Karataş, E., Küçükçene, M. ve Taş, A. (2021). Öğretmen mesleki motivasyonu ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması: Çevrimiçi ve kâğıt kalem uygulamalarının karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (51), 479-498.
• Kunz, A. H. ve Pfaff, D. (2002). Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00031-9
• Kuvaas, B. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.377
• Kuvaas, B. ve Dysvik, A. (2009). Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation, and work performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00103.x
• Lavy, S. (2022). A meaningful boost: Effects of teachers’ sense of meaning at work on their engagement, burnout, and stress. AERA Open, 8, 23328584221079857.
• Lepper, M. R. ve Greene, D. (1978). Overjustification research and beyond: Toward a means-ends analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. M. R. Lepperve D. Greene (Ed.), The hidden costs of reward: new perspectives on the psychology of human motivation içinde (s. 109–148). Erlbaum.
• Liu, W. S., Li, X. W. ve Zou, Y. M. (2019). The formation of teachers’ intrinsic motivation in professional development. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53, 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9465-3
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. ve Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
• Manzoor, F., Wei, L. ve Asif, M. (2021). Intrinsic rewards and employee's performance with the mediating mechanism of employee's motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 563070.
• Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, don'ts, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854
• Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Pearson Education Limited.
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T. ve Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
• McShane, S. L. ve Von Glinow, M. A. (2016). Örgütsel davranış (2. Baskı, A. Günsel ve S. Bozkurt Çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için rehber (3. Baskı, S. Turan, Çev. Ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E. ve Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
• Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285467
• Mossholder, K. W. (1980). Effects of externally mediated goal setting on intrinsic motivation: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.2.202
• Mottaz, C. J. (1985). The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1985.tb00233.x
• Öztürk, İ. H. (2011). Öğretmen özerkliği üzerine kuramsal bir inceleme. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(35), 82-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/esosder/issue/6149/82567
• Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C. ve Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
• Pink, D. (2018). Drive: Nasıl mutlu oluruz? Nasıl mutlu ederiz? (1. Baskı, L. Göktem, Çev.). MediaCat Kitapları.
• Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.
• Robbins, S. P., DeCenzo, D. A. ve Coulter M. (2013). Fundamentals of management: Essential concepts and applications (8th Ed.). Pearson.
• Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y. ve Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to selfdetermined learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000c). When rewards compete with nature: the undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. C. Sansoneve J. Harackiewicz (Ed.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance içinde (s. 14–54). Academic Press.
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
• Ryan, R. M., Mims, V. ve Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.736
• Schumacker, R. ve Lomax, R. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
• Selvi, K. (2010). Teachers’ competencies. Cultura International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology,7(1), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura20107133
• Shahzadi, I., Javed, A., Pirzada, S. S., Nasreen, S. ve Khanam, F. (2014). Impact of employee motivation on employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23), 159-166. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/14794
• Somech, A. ve Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers’ extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3
• Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. ve Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self‐report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x
• Susanto, P. C., Syailendra, S. ve Suryawan, R. F. (2023). Determination of motivation and performance: Analysis of job satisfaction, employee engagement and leadership. International Journal of Business and Applied Economics, 2(2), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v2i2.2135
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.), Pearson Education.
• Tevrüz, S., Artan, İ. ve Bozkurt, T. (2012). Davranışlarımızdan seçmeler: Örgütsel yaklaşım. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Tolici, D. (2021). Strategic management initiatives that promote organizational performance. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2021-0012
• Tomšik, R. (2019). Choosing teaching as a profession: Validation of an SMVUP-4-S Assessment Tool. Problems of Education in The 21st Century, 77(4), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.54
• Uştu, H., Mentiş Taş, A. ve Sever, B. (2016). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişime yönelik algılarına ilişkin nitel bir araştırma. Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 15-23.
• Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B. ve Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382
• Wang, X.-H. (F.), Kim, T.-Y. ve Lee, D.-R. (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231–3239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.026
• Willemse, M. ve Deacon, E. (2015). Experiencing a sense of calling: The influence of meaningful work on teachers' work attitudes. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1274
• Wu, S. M. (2012). Relationships among perceived likeability of principal, school identity, and teacher motivation. Comprehensive Psychology, 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.11.21.CP.1.
• Xue, H., Luo, Y., Luan, Y. ve Wang, N. (2022). A meta-analysis of leadership and intrinsic motivation: Examining relative importance and moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941161
• Yazıcı, H. (2009). Öğretmenlik mesleği, motivasyon kaynakları ve temel tutumlar: Kuramsal bir bakış. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 33-46.
• Zara, A., Shehzad, A., Zameer, M., Arshad, N., Tariq, A. ve Abid, G. (2022). Impact of employee autonomy and family motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: Mediation of intrinsic motivation and moderation of fairness perception. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 11(2), 271-291. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6643243