Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?”

Year 2018, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 277 - 292, 21.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771

Abstract

Öğretim
süreçlerinde uygun teknolojik süreçlerin ve kaynaklarının kullanılmasıyla
öğrenmenin geliştirilmesi ve kalıcı olması amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda
öğrenme ortamlarında bilginin görselleştirilmesini sağlayan yöntem ve
teknolojilerin kullanılmasıyla öğrenmenin güçlendirilmesi ve özdüzenleme
süreçlerinin geliştirilmesi hedeflenmektedir. Karma yöntem araştırmasının
kullanıldığı bu çalışmada, öğretmen adayları nasıl daha iyi öğrenebileceklerini
yansıttıkları infografikleri tasarlamışlardır. Çalışmaya 2016-2017 güz
döneminde 1. Sınıf öğrencisi olan 21 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel
veriler ilk olarak, tematik analiz kullanılarak öğretmen adaylarının, kendi
öğrenme yöntemlerini yansıttıkları infografiklerin, özdüzenleme süreçlerini
kapsama potensiyeli, Zimmerman’ın (2000) özdüzenleme modeli temelinde
geliştirilen gösterge listesi rehberliğinde, iki uzman tarafından
değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmada ikinci olarak nitel veriler öğretmen
adaylarının infografik tasarlama sürecine ilişkin görüşleri, açık uçlu sorular
aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak uzmanların görüşleri incelendiğinde,
katılımcıların kendi öğrenme yöntemlerini yansıttıkları infografiklerin
özdüzenleme süreçlerini kapsadığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca öğretmen
adaylarının görüşlerine uygulanan tematik analiz sonuçlarına göre infografik
hazırlama sürecinde, katılımcıların özdüzenleme becerilerinin desteklendiği
görülmüştür. Son olarak araştırmanın nicel verileri, dönem boyunca desteklenen
özdüzenleyici öğrenme süreçleriyle infografik etkinliğinde değerlendirilen
özdüzenleme becerileri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki (r = .60) olduğu saptanmıştır.

References

  • Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2), 101–128. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41, 32–44. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367-379. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. QualitativeResearch in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brown, J. S. & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32. 25 December 2017 retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0811.pdf Cartwright, V., & Hammond, M. (2003). The integration and embedding of ICT into the school curriculum: more questions than answers. In ITTE 2003 Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Trinity and All Saints College, Leeds. Chang, M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187-196. Chen, P., & McGrath, D. (2004). Visualize, visualize, visualize: Designing projects for higher order thinking. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(4), 54-57. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 60-71. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll. Gao, T. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning, 14(4), 367–386. Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A. & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 180–192. Haşlaman, T. (2015). Özdüzenleyici Öğrenmeyi Destekleyen Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamları, In B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman & F. Odabaşı (Eds). Eğitim Teknolojileri Okumaları. (s. 491-514) TOJET - Sakarya Üniversitesi. Haşlaman, T. (2017). Supporting self-regulated learning: A digital storytelling implementation, Elementary Education Online, 16(4), 1407-1424. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226. ISTE (2016). International Society for Technology in Education Standards for Students. [Online]: Retrieved on 19-June-2017, at https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students Jairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). Helping students soar to success on computers: An investigation of the SOAR study method for computer-based learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 601-614. Jarvela, S., Naykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71-79. Jones, B. (2008). Interviews with 20 Web 2.0 Influencers: Web 2.0 Heroes. Indianapolis, Ind, Wiley. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 139–161. doi:10.2190/AX2D-Y9VMV7PX-0TAD Kauffman, D. F., Ge, X., Xie, K., & Chen, C.(2008). Prompting in web-based environments:Supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(2), 115–137.doi:10.2190/EC.38.2.a Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 235-252. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2011). The role of Web 2.0 technologies in self‐regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 99-106. Kramarski, B. (2002). Enhancing math discourse: The effects of email conversation on learning graphing. Educational Media International, 39(1), 100–107. doi:10.1080/09523980210131169 Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of educational psychology, 101(1), 161-175. Lai, K-W. (2008). ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 215–230). New York: Springer. Law, N. (2008). Teacher learning beyond knowledge for pedagogical innovations with ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 425–434). New York: Springer. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614. Lee, H., Lim, K., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629-648. López-Morteo, G., & López, G. (2007). Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. Computers & Education, 48(4), 618-641. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., & de Jong, T. (2009). Collaborative versus individual use of regulative software scaffolds during scientific inquiry learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(2), 105–117. doi:10.1080/10494820701706437 Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, (1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self‐regulation: enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335-352. Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Eğitimde Bilgi Görselleştirme: Kavram Haritalarından İnfografiklere. In B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman & F. Odabaşı (Eds). Eğitim Teknolojileri Okumaları. (s. 271-287) TOJET - Sakarya Üniversitesi. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25, 211-225. Schrock, K. (2014). Infographics as a creative assessment. Retrieved 20 December, 2017 from: http://www.schrockguide.net/infographics-as-an-assessment.html Smiciklas, M. (2012). The Power of Infographics. Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect with Your Audiences. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey. Steffens, K. (2006). Self-Regulated Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41, 353-379. Stubbé, H. E. & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2008). Self-directed adult learning in a ubiquitous learning environment: A meta-review. In M. Kalz, R. Koper, V. Hornung-Prähauser & M. Luckmann(Eds), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Technology Support for Self-Organized Learners (pp. 5-28). Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University. van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001 Waeytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2002). ‘Learning to learn’: teachers’ conceptions of their supporting role. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 305–322. Wang, C., Calandra, B., Hibbard, S. T., & McDowell Lefaiver, M. L. (2012). Learning effects of an experimental EFL program in second life. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(5), 943-961. Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J.C., Kumar, V., Hadwin, A.F., Lajoie, S.P., Azevedo, R., & Perry, N.E. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit project. Technology. Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 105-113. Wood, J. M. (2007, October 3). Understanding and Computing Cohen’s Kappa: A Tutorial. WebPsychEmpiricist. [Online]: Retrieved on 25-June-2017 at http://wpe.info/papers_table.html. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 38. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Supporting Students as Self-Regulated Learners with Use of Infographics: “How can I Learn Better?”

Year 2018, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 277 - 292, 21.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771

Abstract

In the educational processes, it is aimed to enhanced
learning and make it permanent with the use of appropriate technological
processes and resources. Accordingly, it is aimed to strengthen learning and
support self-regulatory processes with the use of methods and technologies that
visualize the knowledge in learning environments. In this
mixed method research, preservice
teachers designed infographics, which reflected how they could learn better.
The study included 21 freshman preservice teachers during in the Fall semester
of 2016-2017. Firstly, the study was conducted qualitatively by using thematic
analysis and the potential of infographics reflecting the learning methods of
preservice teachers to include self-regulatory processes. They were evaluated
by two experts under the guidance of an indicator list developed on the basis
of Zimmerman’s (2000) self-regulation model. Secondly, views of preservice
teachers on the process of designing infographics were obtained qualitatively,
via open-ended questions. Data analysis of the experts’ opinions showed that
infographics reflecting the learning methods of participants include
self-regulatory processes. In addition, according to the results of thematic
analysis of views of preservice teachers; it was seen that self-regulatory
skills of participants are supported in the process of preparing infographics.
Finally, in the study it was observed that there was a significant relationship
(r = .60) between self-regulatory
processes that were supported throughout the semester and self-regulatory
skills that were evaluated in the infographics activity.

References

  • Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2), 101–128. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41, 32–44. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367-379. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. QualitativeResearch in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brown, J. S. & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32. 25 December 2017 retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0811.pdf Cartwright, V., & Hammond, M. (2003). The integration and embedding of ICT into the school curriculum: more questions than answers. In ITTE 2003 Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Trinity and All Saints College, Leeds. Chang, M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187-196. Chen, P., & McGrath, D. (2004). Visualize, visualize, visualize: Designing projects for higher order thinking. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(4), 54-57. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 60-71. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll. Gao, T. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning, 14(4), 367–386. Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A. & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 180–192. Haşlaman, T. (2015). Özdüzenleyici Öğrenmeyi Destekleyen Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamları, In B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman & F. Odabaşı (Eds). Eğitim Teknolojileri Okumaları. (s. 491-514) TOJET - Sakarya Üniversitesi. Haşlaman, T. (2017). Supporting self-regulated learning: A digital storytelling implementation, Elementary Education Online, 16(4), 1407-1424. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226. ISTE (2016). International Society for Technology in Education Standards for Students. [Online]: Retrieved on 19-June-2017, at https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students Jairam, D., & Kiewra, K. A. (2010). Helping students soar to success on computers: An investigation of the SOAR study method for computer-based learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 601-614. Jarvela, S., Naykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71-79. Jones, B. (2008). Interviews with 20 Web 2.0 Influencers: Web 2.0 Heroes. Indianapolis, Ind, Wiley. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 139–161. doi:10.2190/AX2D-Y9VMV7PX-0TAD Kauffman, D. F., Ge, X., Xie, K., & Chen, C.(2008). Prompting in web-based environments:Supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(2), 115–137.doi:10.2190/EC.38.2.a Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 235-252. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2011). The role of Web 2.0 technologies in self‐regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 99-106. Kramarski, B. (2002). Enhancing math discourse: The effects of email conversation on learning graphing. Educational Media International, 39(1), 100–107. doi:10.1080/09523980210131169 Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of educational psychology, 101(1), 161-175. Lai, K-W. (2008). ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 215–230). New York: Springer. Law, N. (2008). Teacher learning beyond knowledge for pedagogical innovations with ICT. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 425–434). New York: Springer. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614. Lee, H., Lim, K., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629-648. López-Morteo, G., & López, G. (2007). Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. Computers & Education, 48(4), 618-641. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., & de Jong, T. (2009). Collaborative versus individual use of regulative software scaffolds during scientific inquiry learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(2), 105–117. doi:10.1080/10494820701706437 Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, (1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self‐regulation: enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335-352. Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Eğitimde Bilgi Görselleştirme: Kavram Haritalarından İnfografiklere. In B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman & F. Odabaşı (Eds). Eğitim Teknolojileri Okumaları. (s. 271-287) TOJET - Sakarya Üniversitesi. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25, 211-225. Schrock, K. (2014). Infographics as a creative assessment. Retrieved 20 December, 2017 from: http://www.schrockguide.net/infographics-as-an-assessment.html Smiciklas, M. (2012). The Power of Infographics. Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect with Your Audiences. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey. Steffens, K. (2006). Self-Regulated Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: lessons of a European peer review. European Journal of Education, 41, 353-379. Stubbé, H. E. & Theunissen, N. C. M. (2008). Self-directed adult learning in a ubiquitous learning environment: A meta-review. In M. Kalz, R. Koper, V. Hornung-Prähauser & M. Luckmann(Eds), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Technology Support for Self-Organized Learners (pp. 5-28). Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen University. van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001 Waeytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2002). ‘Learning to learn’: teachers’ conceptions of their supporting role. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 305–322. Wang, C., Calandra, B., Hibbard, S. T., & McDowell Lefaiver, M. L. (2012). Learning effects of an experimental EFL program in second life. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(5), 943-961. Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J.C., Kumar, V., Hadwin, A.F., Lajoie, S.P., Azevedo, R., & Perry, N.E. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit project. Technology. Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 105-113. Wood, J. M. (2007, October 3). Understanding and Computing Cohen’s Kappa: A Tutorial. WebPsychEmpiricist. [Online]: Retrieved on 25-June-2017 at http://wpe.info/papers_table.html. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 38. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. Handbook of Self-Regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Araştırma Articlesi
Authors

Tülin Haşlaman This is me

Publication Date March 21, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Haşlaman, T. (2018). Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?”. İlköğretim Online, 17(1), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771
AMA Haşlaman T.Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?.” EEO. January 2018;17(1):277-292. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771
Chicago Haşlaman, Tülin. “Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: ‘Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?’”. İlköğretim Online 17, no. 1 (January 2018): 277-92. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771.
EndNote Haşlaman T (January 1, 2018) Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?”. İlköğretim Online 17 1 277–292.
IEEE T. Haşlaman, “Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: ‘Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?’”, EEO, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 277–292, 2018, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771.
ISNAD Haşlaman, Tülin. “Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: ‘Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?’”. İlköğretim Online 17/1 (January 2018), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771.
JAMA Haşlaman T. Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?”. EEO. 2018;17:277–292.
MLA Haşlaman, Tülin. “Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: ‘Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?’”. İlköğretim Online, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018, pp. 277-92, doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2018.413771.
Vancouver Haşlaman T. Öğrencilerin Özdüzenleyici Öğrenen Olmalarının İnfografik Aracılığıyla Desteklenmesi: “Nasıl Daha İyi Öğrenebilirim?”. EEO. 2018;17(1):277-92.