Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigating Prospective Science Teachers' Misconceptions of Sound

Year 2009, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 313 - 321, 26.06.2009

Abstract

The goal of this study was to describe prospective science teachers’ (PST) misconceptions
about basic sound phenomena and concepts. The study was conducted with 56 PSTs. The questionnaire that
is used as data collection instrument consists of 6 open-ended questions regarding sound properties, the
propagation and nature of sound. Findings of the study indicated that PSTs were not able to describe the
sound propagation correctly at the microscopic level; they were not aware of the need for a material medium,
and their conceptual understanding of the propagation and nature of sound was far from being scientific.

References

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science International Journal of Science Education,11, 481- 490.
  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
  • Küçüközer, H. (2007). Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptions about Astronomical Subjects Science Education International, 18(2), 113-130.
  • Linder, C. J. & Erickson, G. L. (1989). A study of tertiary physics students’ conceptualizations of sound. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 491–501.
  • Linder, C. J. (1992). Understanding sound: So what is the problem. Physics Education, 27, 258– 264.
  • Linder, C. J. (1993). University physics students' conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 655-662.
  • Mathews, M. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism. Science & Education, 6(1-2), 5-14.
  • Maurines, L. (1992). Spontaneous reasoning on the propagation of visible mechanical signals. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 279-293.
  • Wittmann, M. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analyzing studentreasoning in wave physics. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 97– 118.
  • Wittmann, M., Steinberg, R. N. & Redish, E. F. (2003). Understanding and affecting studentreasoning about sound waves. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 991–1013.

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi

Year 2009, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 313 - 321, 26.06.2009

Abstract

Bu çalışması, fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının ses dalgalarının temel temelleri ve kavramları yaklaşık kavram yanılgılarının betimlenmesi. Çalışma, Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği ders öğrenim gören 56 öğrenciyle yapıldıilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak üretilmiş anket, sesin yayılması, doğası, sesin özellikleri 6 adet açık-uçlu sorudan oluşur. Veriler nitel analiz etmek. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, öğretmek ve olgularından sesin doğası, yayılması ve sesin vücutlerine açılan kavram yanılgılarının olduğu koymaktadır.

References

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science International Journal of Science Education,11, 481- 490.
  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
  • Küçüközer, H. (2007). Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptions about Astronomical Subjects Science Education International, 18(2), 113-130.
  • Linder, C. J. & Erickson, G. L. (1989). A study of tertiary physics students’ conceptualizations of sound. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 491–501.
  • Linder, C. J. (1992). Understanding sound: So what is the problem. Physics Education, 27, 258– 264.
  • Linder, C. J. (1993). University physics students' conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 655-662.
  • Mathews, M. (1997). Introductory comments on philosophy and constructivism. Science & Education, 6(1-2), 5-14.
  • Maurines, L. (1992). Spontaneous reasoning on the propagation of visible mechanical signals. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 279-293.
  • Wittmann, M. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analyzing studentreasoning in wave physics. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 97– 118.
  • Wittmann, M., Steinberg, R. N. & Redish, E. F. (2003). Understanding and affecting studentreasoning about sound waves. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 991–1013.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Asuman Küçüközer This is me

Publication Date June 26, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Küçüközer, A. (2009). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 313-321.
AMA Küçüközer A. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi. EEO. June 2009;8(2):313-321.
Chicago Küçüközer, Asuman. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online 8, no. 2 (June 2009): 313-21.
EndNote Küçüközer A (June 1, 2009) Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online 8 2 313–321.
IEEE A. Küçüközer, “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi”, EEO, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 313–321, 2009.
ISNAD Küçüközer, Asuman. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online 8/2 (June 2009), 313-321.
JAMA Küçüközer A. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi. EEO. 2009;8:313–321.
MLA Küçüközer, Asuman. “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi”. İlköğretim Online, vol. 8, no. 2, 2009, pp. 313-21.
Vancouver Küçüközer A. Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Ses Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının İncelenmesi. EEO. 2009;8(2):313-21.