Öğretmen Adaylarının Gelişim Dosyasına Dayalı Değerlendirmeye İlişkin Görüleri

Öz

Bu araştırma, öğretmen adaylarının gelişim dosyasına dayalı değerlendirmeye ilişkin görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinden 150 öğretmen adayı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma verileri anket ile toplanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen nicel verilerin çözümlenmesinde; yüzde ve ki kare testi, nitel verilerin çözümlenmesinde; betimsel analiz tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, öğretmen adayları gelişim dosyasına dayalı değerlendirmenin nesnel, performans ölçen ve gerekli bir değerlendirme tekniği olduğunu, bireysel ve mesleki gelişimlerine katkı sağladığını belirtmişlerdir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adayları bu süreçte, en çok zamanlama sorunu yaşadıklarını, bu sürecin daha etkili yürütülebilmesi için yönlendirmelerin daha etkili yapılması gerektiğini belirtmişlerdir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen eğitimi, gelişim dosyası değerlendirme, öğretmen adayları

Opinions of Teacher Candidates as to the Portfolio Assessment

Abstract

The study aims to determine the opinions of teacher candidates as to the portfolio assessment. The study group consists of 150 teacher candidates at Anadolu University, Faculty of Education. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which were then analyzed with percentage, chi square test. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive analysis technique. In conclusion, teacher candidates have stated that portfolio is an objective, and vital assessment technique which fairly measures performance. They have also stated that it contributes to their individual and occupational developments. They are of the opinion that the biggest problem they face in portfolio is timing and that they need orientation so that the evaluation process runs smoothly and efficiently.

Keywords

• Teacher education,portfolio assessment,teacher candidates

References

1. Achrazoglou, G. J. (2003). Assessing teacher preparedness using electronic portfolios and conventional methods. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Iova. 2003) ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 765162681).
2. Anderson, M. A. (2005).Yes You should create a professional portfolio. Multimedia Internet School, 4, 34-36.
3. Atay, D. (2003). Ö retmen adaylarına yansıtmayı ö retmek: Portfolyo çalı ması. Kuram ve Uygulamada E itim Yönetimi, 9(36), 508-527.
4. Atay-Yalaza, D. (2003). Ö retmen e itiminin de i en yüzü. (1. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
5. Bintz, W. & Shake, M. (2005). From university to classrooms: A pre-service teachers’ writing portfolio program and impact on instruction in teaching strategies for writing portfolios in the classroom. Reading Horizons, 45(3), 217-232.
6. Breault, R. A. (2004). Dissonant themes in pre-service portfolio development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 847-859.
7. Campbell, M. D., Melenyzer, J. B., Nettles, D. H., & Wyman, R. M. (2000). Portfolio and Performance Assessment in Teacher Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8. Campbell, M. D., Cignetti, B. P., Melenyzer, J. B., Nettles, D. H.& Wyman, R. M. (2004). How to Develop a Professional Portfolio. (Third edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

9. Chung, R. R. (2005). The performance assessment for California Teachers and beginning teacher development: Can a performance assessment promote expert teaching practice? (Doctoral Dissertation, Standford University, 2005) ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 982811911).
10. Crutchfield. M. D. (2004). Preservice portfolios and first year teaching practice: What are the connections? (Doctoral Dissertation. George Mason University, 2004). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 765352531).
11. Darling, L. F. (2001). Portfolio as practice: The narratives of emerging teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 107-121.
12. Dutt-Doner, K. M., & Personett, C. (1997). Using portfolio to assess in an undergraduate teacher education course: What did the students and instructor learn? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997). ED: 410 247.
13. Frazier, D. M. & Paulson, F. L. (1992). How portfolios motivate reluctant writers. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 62-65.
14. Funk, M. L. (2005). The use of electronic portfolios within teacher education programs at Renaissance Group member instutions. (Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University, 2005) ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 862929411).
15. Henning, J. E., DeBruin-Parecki, A., Hawbaker, B. W., Nielsen, C. P., Joram, E. & Gabriele A. J. (2005). The teacher work sample: A tool for scaffolding and assessing pre-service teacher’s early field experiences. The Teacher Education, 40(3), 188-207.
16. Korkmaz, H., & Kaptan, F. (2003). lkö retim fen ö retmenlerinin portfolyonun uygulanabilirli ine yönelik güçlükler hakkındaki algıları. Pamukkale Üniversitesi E itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 167- 174.
17. Korkmaz, H., & Kaptan, F. (2005). Fen e itiminde ö rencilerin geli imini de erlendirmek için elektronik portfolyo kullanımı üzerine bir inceleme. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, [Elektronik Dergi]. 4(1), 101-106. http://www.tojet.net/v4i1.pdf adresinden 12 Ekim 2005 tarihinde indirilmi tir.
18. Laurence, L. S. L. (2003). Low motivation on schools teachers’ construction of teaching portfolios. Curriculum and Teaching. 18(2), 71-87.
19. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Second Edition. California: Sage Publications.
20. Morgil, ., Cingör, N., Erökten, S., Yavuz, S. & Özyalçın Oskay, Ö. (2004). Bilgisayar destekli kimya e itiminde Geli im dosyası çalı maları. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, [Elektronik Dergi]. 3(2), 105-119. http://www.tojet.net/v3i2.pdf adresinden 12 Ekim 2005 tarihinde indirilmi tir.
21. Paulson, L. F., Paulson, P. R. & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
22. Pekkanlı, E. . (2003). The impact of the European language portfolio on the learner autonomy of Turkish primary school students. Yayımlanmamı doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi E itim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eski ehir.
23. Retallick, J. & Groundwatwer-Smith, S. (1999).Teachers’ workplace learning and learning portfolio. Asia- Pasific Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 47-59.
24. Rolheiser, C. & Schwartz, S. (2001). Pre-service portfolios: A base for professional growth. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(3), 283-300
25. Sewell, M., Marczak, M. & Horn. M. (2005). The use of portfolio assessment in evaluation. http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios.html adresinden 10 Ekim 2005 tarihinde indirilmi tir.
26. Simpson, L. A . J. (2004). Student teacher exit portfolios: Is it an appropriate measure and a unique contribution toward the assessment of highly qualified teacher candidates? (Doctoral Dissertation. University of Maryland. 2004), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 765362451).
27. Sivakumaran, T. (2005). Analysis of teacher candidates’ and faculty evaluationof the utility of a single digital portfolio system. (Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Tennessee, 2005), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (ProQuest document ID: 953995161).
28. Spence, W. & El-Ansari, W. (2004). Portfolio assessment: Practice teachers’ early experience. Nurse Education Today, 24(5), 388-401
29. Williams, S. C., Davis M. L., Metcalf, D. & Covington V. M. (2003). The evaluation of a process portfolio as an assessment system in a teacher education. Current Issues in Education. [Online]. 6(1). http://cie.asu.edu/volume1/number1 adresinden 17 Mart 2004 tarihinde indirilmi tir.
30. Zeichner, K. & Wray, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(5), 613-621.
31. Zou, M. (2002). Organizing instructional practice around the assessment portfolio: The gains and losses. ED: 469 469. http:// www.eric.ed.gov/ adresinden 17 Mart 2004 tarihinde indirilmi tir.