Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity

Fedor F. Glisin; Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi; Pavel B. Melnik; Sergey B. Shchepanskiy

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 190 - 194, 01.05.2016

Fedor F. Glisin Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi Pavel B. Melnik Sergey B. Shchepanskiy

Abstract

Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 190 - 194, 01.05.2016

Fedor F. Glisin Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi Pavel B. Melnik Sergey B. Shchepanskiy

Abstract

The growing role of S&T funds as one of the important mechanisms for financing science results in necessity to improve methods for evaluating and
planning activities of such funds. In this paper we identified some indicators of scientific activity based on statistical data analysis. On our opinion
these indicators should be taken into account for evaluation and planning of R&D activities, in particular, regarding S&T funds. One of the key
indicator, which determines pace of scientific development is GERD per one researcher. Accelerated development of science, which manifests itself
in a significant increase in its effectiveness. At the same time, it is sufficient to keep the magnitude in order to achieve high values of performance and
efficiency of scientific activity if management of financial flows is enough efficient. If each researcher publishes approximately 1 work in 2 years, it
will be enough to ensure the quality and relevance of scientific publications.

Keywords

Corrector, Moderator, Tutor, Subject Teacher, Meta-competence

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID	JA22FZ25FS
Journal Section	Collection
Authors	Fedor F. Glisin This is me Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi This is me Pavel B. Melnik This is me Sergey B. Shchepanskiy This is me
Publication Date	May 1, 2016
Published in Issue	Year 2016 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA	Glisin, F. F., Kaluzhnyi, V. V., Melnik, P. B., Shchepanskiy, S. B. (2016). Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(3), 190-194.
AMA	Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. May 2016;6(3):190-194.
Chicago	Glisin, Fedor F., Vladimir V. Kaluzhnyi, Pavel B. Melnik, and Sergey B. Shchepanskiy. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6, no. 3 (May 2016): 190-94.
EndNote	Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB (May 1, 2016) Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. International Review of Management and Marketing 6 3 190–194.
IEEE	F. F. Glisin, V. V. Kaluzhnyi, P. B. Melnik, and S. B. Shchepanskiy, “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”, IRMM, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 190–194, 2016.
ISNAD	Glisin, Fedor F. et al. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing 6/3 (May 2016), 190-194.
JAMA	Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6:190–194.
MLA	Glisin, Fedor F. et al. “Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity”. International Review of Management and Marketing, vol. 6, no. 3, 2016, pp. 190-4.
Vancouver	Glisin FF, Kaluzhnyi VV, Melnik PB, Shchepanskiy SB. Criteria for Evaluation and Planning of Science Foundation Activity. IRMM. 2016;6(3):190-4.