EN
The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?
Abstract
Al-Zamakhsharī’s Muʿtazilī identity is undisputed, aside from a few isolated assertions or inquiries to the contrary. In fact, alongside historical records that depict him as a loyal Muʿtazilī and even a propagandist for his madhhab, the opinions he expressed and the approaches he employed in his works serve as evidence for this claim. The two Muʿtazilī schools that operated during his time in the Muslim world, in particular in his own region of Khwārazm, were the Bahshamiyyah and the Ḥusayniyyah. Considering this fact, in terms of his theological identity, it could be asserted either that he is a member of one of the Bahshamī or Ḥusaynī schools or that he positions himself “in search of a broadly based, catholic Muʿtazilism” instead of taking a clear stand. This study, while providing partial evidence for the latter claim, argues that his Ḥusaynī identity is rather evident from his ideological stance and opinions.
Keywords
References
- Altun, Hilmi Kemal. “Behşemiyye ve Hüseyniyye Arasında Zemahşerî’nin Yerinin Değerlendirilmesi.” Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 6, no. 11 (December 2019), 712-737.
- al-Andalusī, Abū Ḥayyān Muḥammad ibn Yūsuf ibn ʿAlī. Tafsīr al-baḥr al-muḥīṭ. Edited by ʿĀdil Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawjūd and ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ. 8 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1993.
- al-Andarasbānī, ʿAbd al-Salām ibn Muḥammad. Fī sīrat al-Zamakhsharī Jār Allāh. Edited by ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Yāfī. Majallat Majmaʿ al-Lughah al-ʿArabiyyah bi-Dimashq 57, no. 3 (August 1982), 365-382.
- al-Ashʿarī, Abū l-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Ismāʿīl Ibn Abī Bishr. Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn wa-ikhtilāf al-muṣallīn. Edited by Hellmut Ritter. 2 vols. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1980.
- al-ʿAsqalānī, Abū l-Faḍl Shihāb al-Dīn Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad Ibn Ḥajar. Lisān al-Mīzān. Edited by ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Abū Ghuddah and Salmān ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Abū Ghuddah. 10 vols. Beirut: Maktab al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Islāmiyyah, 2002.
- al-Baghdādī, Abū Manṣūr ʿAbd al-Qāhir ibn Ṭāhir. al-Farq bayna l-firaq. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥyī al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣriyyah, 1995.
- al-Baghdādī, Abū Manṣūr ʿAbd al-Qāhir ibn Ṭāhir. Kitāb Uṣūl al-dīn. 3rd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1981.
- al-Baḥrānī, Kamāl al-Dīn Mītham ibn ʿAlī ibn Mītham. Qawāʿid al-marām fī ʿilm al-kalām. Edited by al-Sayyid Aḥmad al-Ḥusaynī. 2nd ed. Qom: Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-ʿUẓmá al-Marʿashī al-Najafī, 1406 AH.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Religious Studies
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
December 31, 2021
Submission Date
September 29, 2021
Acceptance Date
December 20, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 12 Number: 2
APA
Kılavuz, U. M. (2021). The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī? Ilahiyat Studies, 12(2), 237-293. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228
AMA
1.Kılavuz UM. The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī? IS. 2021;12(2):237-293. doi:10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228
Chicago
Kılavuz, Ulvi Murat. 2021. “The Muʿtazilism of Al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?”. Ilahiyat Studies 12 (2): 237-93. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228.
EndNote
Kılavuz UM (December 1, 2021) The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī? Ilahiyat Studies 12 2 237–293.
IEEE
[1]U. M. Kılavuz, “The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?”, IS, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 237–293, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228.
ISNAD
Kılavuz, Ulvi Murat. “The Muʿtazilism of Al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?”. Ilahiyat Studies 12/2 (December 1, 2021): 237-293. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228.
JAMA
1.Kılavuz UM. The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī? IS. 2021;12:237–293.
MLA
Kılavuz, Ulvi Murat. “The Muʿtazilism of Al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?”. Ilahiyat Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, Dec. 2021, pp. 237-93, doi:10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228.
Vancouver
1.Ulvi Murat Kılavuz. The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī? IS. 2021 Dec. 1;12(2):237-93. doi:10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228