Research Article

Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger's Onto-Theology Criticism -

Volume: 2 Number: 2 April 11, 2012
EN

Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger's Onto-Theology Criticism -

Abstract

This article aims to treat the uniqueness of religious thought as a subject of reflection by reference to Martin Heidegger’s philosophy since his views incorporate such a deeply rooted analysis. In pursuing the subject the article inquiries into the possibility of a non-metaphysical religious mode of thought in considering Heidegger’s critique of traditional Western metaphysics, his assessments on the onto-theological and humanistic character of metaphysics, and his evaluations on the meaning of true thinking pursuant to the mode of thought he calls ontological. With regard to our assessments of religious thought, we take Heidegger’s onto-theological criticisms as a point of departure. However, considering his philosophy and manner of thinking, we try to reveal what kind of possibilities the Heideggerian view can provide us in terms of religious thinking. Therefore, it is important that our assessments of religious thought not be interpreted as identical to Heidegger’s philosophy but rather as ideas that he might have potentially incorporated into his own philosophy.

Keywords

References

  1. Bertens, Hans, The Idea of the Postmodern: A History (London & New York: Routledge, 1995). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359327
  2. Bloechl, Jeffrey (ed.), The Face of the Other and the Trace of God: Essays on the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas (New York: Fordham University Press, 2000).
  3. Hankey, Wayne, "Theoria versus Poesis: Neoplatonism and Trinitarian Dif-ference in Aquinas, John Milbank, Jean-Luc Marion and John Zizioulas," Modern Theology 15/4 (1999), 387-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0025.00105
  4. Heidegger, Martin, Discourse on Thinking (trans. John M. Anderson and E. Hans Freund; New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1966).
  5. Heidegger, Martin, Identity and Difference (translated with an intro-duction by Joan Stambaugh, New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1969); Turkish translation: Özdeşlik ve Ayrım (translated into Turkish by Necati Aça; Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, 1997).
  6. Heidegger, Martin, "Letter on Humanism" (trans. Frank A. Capuzzi), in his Pathmarks (ed. William McNeill; Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1998); Turkish translation: "'Hümanizm' Üzerine Mektup," in Ahmet Aydoğan (ed. and trans.), Hümanizmin Özü: Heidegger, Sartre, Eliot, Babbit (Istanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2002), 37-95.
  7. Heidegger, Martin, "Metafiziğin Onto-teo-lojik İnşası [The Onto-theo-logical Constitution of Metaphysics]," in Ahmet Demirhan (ed. and trans. into Turkish), Heidegger ve Teoloji [Heidegger and Theology] (Is-tanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2002), 49-71.
  8. Heidegger, Martin, "Science and Reflection," in his The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (trans. William Lovitt; New York: Garland Publishing, 1977), 155-182; Turkish translation: "Bilim ve Düşünüm," in his Bilim Üzerine İki Ders [Two Essays by Heidegger on Science] (translated into Turkish by Hakkı Hünler; Istanbul: Paradigma Yayınları, 1998), 13-44.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Religious Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

April 11, 2012

Submission Date

May 15, 2011

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2011

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 2 Number: 2

APA
Küçükalp, K. (2012). Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -. Ilahiyat Studies, 2(2), 146-167. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35
AMA
1.Küçükalp K. Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -. IS. 2012;2(2):146-167. doi:10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35
Chicago
Küçükalp, Kasım. 2012. “Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -”. Ilahiyat Studies 2 (2): 146-67. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35.
EndNote
Küçükalp K (April 1, 2012) Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -. Ilahiyat Studies 2 2 146–167.
IEEE
[1]K. Küçükalp, “Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -”, IS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 146–167, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35.
ISNAD
Küçükalp, Kasım. “Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -”. Ilahiyat Studies 2/2 (April 1, 2012): 146-167. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35.
JAMA
1.Küçükalp K. Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -. IS. 2012;2:146–167.
MLA
Küçükalp, Kasım. “Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -”. Ilahiyat Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, Apr. 2012, pp. 146-67, doi:10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35.
Vancouver
1.Kasım Küçükalp. Is a Non-Metaphysical Religious Thought Possible? - Possibility of Religious Thought Within The Scope of Heidegger’s Onto-Theology Criticism -. IS. 2012 Apr. 1;2(2):146-67. doi:10.12730/13091719.2011.22.35
SCImago Journal & Country Rank