Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Traditionist Internal Reform: Motives behind the Birth of the First Manual of ʿUlūm al-Ḥadīth

Year 2020, , 295 - 316, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2020.112.211

Abstract

Al-Rāmahurmuzī’s Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī has been widely accepted as the first composition in the discipline of ḥadīth sciences (ʿulūm al-ḥadīth). However, little is known about the real motive behind this sophisticated work. This paper seeks to contribute to ḥadīth historiography by exposing the agenda behind the composition of al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil. This study suggests that the book reflects al-Rāmahurmuzī’s critical appraisal of the traditionist group and his remarkable effort to initiate an internal reform. Contrary to common supposition, his motive was not mainly to preserve ḥadīth theories and technicalities. Instead, he intended to upgrade the traditionist state of scholarship after a significant decline since the abolishment of miḥnah khalq al-Qurʾān (the inquisition over the createdness of the Qurʾān). His emphasis on the importance of dirāyah aimed to revive the excellence of past ḥadīth scholars and to close the gap that separated the traditionists from their jurist (fuqahāʾ) counterparts.

Thanks

This study was funded by the Research University Grant (304/PHUMANITI/6315401) from Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. All mistakes and shortcomings are my own.

References

  • Abrahamov, Binyamin. 1998. Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism. Edinburg University Press.
  • Abū Ghuddah, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ. 1391 H. Masʾalat khalq al-Qurʾān wa-atharuhā fī ṣufūf al-ruwāt wa-l-muḥaddithīn wa-kutub al-jarḥ wa-l-taʿdīl. Aleppo: Maktab al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Islāmiyyah.
  • Abū Ghuddah, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ. 2008. Lamaḥāt min tārīkh al-Sunnah wa-ʿulūm al-ḥadīth. Aleppo: Maktab al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Islāmiyyah.
  • Abū Shuhbah, Muḥammad. nd. al-Wasīṭ fī ‘ūlum al-ḥadīth. Jeddah: ʿĀlam al-Maʿrifah.
  • Abū Zahw, Muḥammad. 1984. al-Ḥadīth wa-l-Muḥaddithūn. Riyad.
  • Abu Zayd, Muḥammad Muḥib al-Dīn (ed.). 2016. Introduction to al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna al-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Cairo: Dār al-Dakhāʾir.
  • al-ʿAsqalānī. Ahmad Ibn Ḥajar. 1992. Al-Muʿjam al-muʾassis. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah.
  • al-ʿAsqalānī. Ahmad Ibn Ḥajar. 2002. Nuzhat al-naẓar fī sharḥ nukhbat al-fikar. Damascus: Dār al-ʿAṭāʾ.
  • al-ʿAwnī, Ḥātim ibn ʿĀrif. 1996. al-Manhaj al-muqtaraḥ li-fahm al-muṣṭalaḥ: Dirāsāt taʾrīkhiyyah taʾṣīliyyah li-muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth. Riyad: Dār al-Hijrah.
  • al-Bayhaqī, Ahmad bin Ḥusayn. 2002. al-Asmāʾ wa-l-ṣifāt. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.
  • Brown, Daniel. 1996. Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Britain: Cambridge University Press.
  • al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. 1986. Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah.
  • al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. 1998. Tadhkirat al-Ḥuffāẓ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Durays, Khālid Manṣūr. 1428 H. Naqd al-matn al-ḥadīthī wa-atharuh fī l-ḥukm ʿalá l-ruwāt ʿind ʿulamāʾ al-jarḥ wa-l-taʿdīl. Riyad: Dār al-Muḥaddith.
  • El-Omari, Racha. 2012. “Accommodation and Resistance: Classical Muʿtazilites on Ḥadīth.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 71, (2): 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1086/666732.
  • al-Farrāʾ, Muḥammad bin al-Ḥusayn. 1410 H. Ibṭāl al-Taʾwīlāt li-akhbār al-ṣifāt. Kuwait: Dār al-Īlāf al-Duwaliyyah.
  • Gunther, Sebastian. 2008. “In our days, religion has once again become something alien: al-Khattabi’s critique of the state of the state of religious learning,” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 25 (3): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v25i3.402.
  • al-Ḥamawī, Yāqūt ibn ʿAbd Allāh. 1993. Mu‘jam al-Udabāʾ. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.
  • al-Ḥamawī, Yāqūt ibn ʿAbd Allāh. 1995. Muʿjam al-Buldān, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.
  • Holtzman, Livnat. 2015. “Hanbalis”. In the Oxford Biblioghraphies online, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0210.xml. Accesed September 11, 2020.
  • Hoover, Jon. 2016. ”Hanbali Theology.” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Ed. Sabine schmidke. DOI: 101.1093/oxfordhb/97801996703.013.014.
  • Hurvitz, Nimrod. 1994. “Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal and the Formation of Islamic Orthodoxy,” PhD diss., Princeton University: Department of Near Eastern Studies.
  • Hurvitz, Nimrod. “Who is the Accused? The Interrogation of Aḥmad Ibn Hanbal.” Qantara 22, (2): 359-373. https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2001.v22.i2.217.
  • Ibn Fūrak, Muḥammad. 1985. Mushkil al-ḥadīth wa-bayānuh, Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
  • Ibn Fūrak, Muḥammad. 2005. Mujarrad maqālāt al-Shaykh al-Ashʿarī. Cairo: Maktabah al-Thaqāfah al-Dīniyyah.
  • Ibn Ḥibbān, Muḥammad. 2000. Kitāb al-Majrūḥīn min al-muḥaddithīn. Riyad: Dār al-Ṣumayʿī.
  • Ibn Khayr, Muḥammad. 1998. Fahrasat Ibn Khayr Ishbīlī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Ibn Qutaybah, ʿAbd Allāh. 1985. Al-Ikhtilāf fī l-lafẓ wa-l-radd ʿalá l-Jahmiyyah wa-l-Mushabbihah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Ibn Qutaybah, ʿAbd Allāh. 1995. Taʾwīl mukhtalif al-ḥadīth, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • Ibn Rajab, ʿAbd al-Raḥman bin Aḥmad. 2001. Sharḥ ʿIlal al-Tirmidhī. Riyadh: Dār al-ʿAtāʾ.
  • Ibrahim, Mahmood. 1994. “Religious Inquisition as Social Policy: The Persecution of the Zanādiqa in the Early Abbasid Caliphate.” Arab Studies Quarterly 16, (2): 53-72.
  • Itr, Nūr al-Dīn. 1997. Manhaj al-naqd fī ʿulūm al-ḥadīth, Damascus: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir.
  • Kamali, Hashim. n.d. A Text book of Ḥadīth Studies. The Islamic Foundation.
  • al-Khāṭīb, ‘Ajāj (ed.). 1984. Introduction to al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Khaṭṭābī, Ḥamd bin Muḥammad. 1932. Maʿālim al-Sunan. Aleppo.
  • Librande, Leonard T. 1976. “Contrast in the two earliest manuals of ʿUlūm al-Ḥadīth: The Beginnings of the Genre.” Ph.D. diss., Canada: McGill University.
  • Librande, Leonard T. 2009. A Reconsideration of Ibn Khallād’s Place in the Buwayhid Lands. Der Islam, 57 (1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.1980.57.1.1. Madelung, Wilfred. 1985. Religious Schools and Sects in Medieval Islam. Britain: Variorum Reprints.
  • Makdisi, George. 1979. “The Significance of the Sunni Schools of Law in Islamic Religious History.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800053277.
  • al-Maqdisī, ʿAbd Allāh Ibn Qudāmah. 1998. al-Muntakhab min al-ʿilal li-l-Khallāl. Riyad: Dār al-Rāyah.
  • Melchert, Alexander. 2001. “Traditionist-jurisprudence and the framing of Islamic Law.” Islamic Law and Society 8, (3): 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851901317230639.
  • Mez, Adam. 1937. The Renaissance of Islam. Translated by Shalahuddin Khuda Bakhsh and D. S. Margoliouth. Patna: Jubilee Printing.
  • Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. 1431 H. Al-Tamyīz. Beirut: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
  • Noor, Umar Muhammad. “Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi and His Approach to Sifat Traditions.” International Journal of Academic Research in Bussiness and Social Sciences 9, (6): 326-336. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/5951.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 1983. Amthāl al-ḥadīth, Bombay: al-Dār al-Salafiyyah.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 1984. al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Edited by ʿAjāj al-Khaṭīb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 2016. al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥib al-Dīn Abū Zayd. Cairo: Dār al-Dhakhāʾir.
  • Sālim, ʿAmr Munʿim. N. D. Qawāʿid ḥadīthiyyah naṣṣa ʿalaihā al-muḥaqqiqūn wa-ghafala ʿanhā al-mushtaghilūn wa-amthilah ʿamaliyyah ʿalá baʿḍ akhṭāʾ al-shāʾiʿah fī taḥqīq al-asānīd. Sharjah: Maktabah al-ʿUmarayn al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • al-Sakhāwī, Muḥammad bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. 2003. Fatḥ al-mughīth bi-sharḥ alfiyyah al-ḥadīth. Beirut: Dār al-ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
  • al-Ṣāliḥī, ʿAli Rajab. 2009. Taḥqīq mabādiʾ al-ʿulūm al-aḥad ʿashar. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • al-Samʿanī, ʿAbd al-Karīm. 1988. al-Ansāb. Beirut: Dār al-Jinān.
  • al-Shahrastānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Karīm. 2005. Al-Milal wa-l-niḥal. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Shawkānī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī. 1999. Itḥāf al-akābir bi-isnād al-dafātir. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
  • al-Sibāʿī, Muṣṭafá. 2003. Al-Sunnah wa-Makānatuhā fī al-Tashrīʿ al-Islāmī. Damascus: Dār al-Warrāq.
  • al-Ṭabarī, ʿAli bin Muḥammad. 2015. Taʾwīl al-āyāt al-mushkilah al-muwaḍḍaḥah wa-bayānuhā bi-l-ḥujaj wa-l-burhān. Cairo: Dār al-Āfāq al-ʿArabiyyah.
  • al-Ṭaḥḥān, Maḥmūd. 2010. Taysīr muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth. Riyad: Maktabah al-Maʿārif.
Year 2020, , 295 - 316, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2020.112.211

Abstract

References

  • Abrahamov, Binyamin. 1998. Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism. Edinburg University Press.
  • Abū Ghuddah, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ. 1391 H. Masʾalat khalq al-Qurʾān wa-atharuhā fī ṣufūf al-ruwāt wa-l-muḥaddithīn wa-kutub al-jarḥ wa-l-taʿdīl. Aleppo: Maktab al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Islāmiyyah.
  • Abū Ghuddah, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ. 2008. Lamaḥāt min tārīkh al-Sunnah wa-ʿulūm al-ḥadīth. Aleppo: Maktab al-Maṭbūʿāt al-Islāmiyyah.
  • Abū Shuhbah, Muḥammad. nd. al-Wasīṭ fī ‘ūlum al-ḥadīth. Jeddah: ʿĀlam al-Maʿrifah.
  • Abū Zahw, Muḥammad. 1984. al-Ḥadīth wa-l-Muḥaddithūn. Riyad.
  • Abu Zayd, Muḥammad Muḥib al-Dīn (ed.). 2016. Introduction to al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna al-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Cairo: Dār al-Dakhāʾir.
  • al-ʿAsqalānī. Ahmad Ibn Ḥajar. 1992. Al-Muʿjam al-muʾassis. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah.
  • al-ʿAsqalānī. Ahmad Ibn Ḥajar. 2002. Nuzhat al-naẓar fī sharḥ nukhbat al-fikar. Damascus: Dār al-ʿAṭāʾ.
  • al-ʿAwnī, Ḥātim ibn ʿĀrif. 1996. al-Manhaj al-muqtaraḥ li-fahm al-muṣṭalaḥ: Dirāsāt taʾrīkhiyyah taʾṣīliyyah li-muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth. Riyad: Dār al-Hijrah.
  • al-Bayhaqī, Ahmad bin Ḥusayn. 2002. al-Asmāʾ wa-l-ṣifāt. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.
  • Brown, Daniel. 1996. Rethinking Tradition in Modern Islamic Thought. Britain: Cambridge University Press.
  • al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. 1986. Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah.
  • al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. 1998. Tadhkirat al-Ḥuffāẓ. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Durays, Khālid Manṣūr. 1428 H. Naqd al-matn al-ḥadīthī wa-atharuh fī l-ḥukm ʿalá l-ruwāt ʿind ʿulamāʾ al-jarḥ wa-l-taʿdīl. Riyad: Dār al-Muḥaddith.
  • El-Omari, Racha. 2012. “Accommodation and Resistance: Classical Muʿtazilites on Ḥadīth.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 71, (2): 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1086/666732.
  • al-Farrāʾ, Muḥammad bin al-Ḥusayn. 1410 H. Ibṭāl al-Taʾwīlāt li-akhbār al-ṣifāt. Kuwait: Dār al-Īlāf al-Duwaliyyah.
  • Gunther, Sebastian. 2008. “In our days, religion has once again become something alien: al-Khattabi’s critique of the state of the state of religious learning,” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 25 (3): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajiss.v25i3.402.
  • al-Ḥamawī, Yāqūt ibn ʿAbd Allāh. 1993. Mu‘jam al-Udabāʾ. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.
  • al-Ḥamawī, Yāqūt ibn ʿAbd Allāh. 1995. Muʿjam al-Buldān, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.
  • Holtzman, Livnat. 2015. “Hanbalis”. In the Oxford Biblioghraphies online, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0210.xml. Accesed September 11, 2020.
  • Hoover, Jon. 2016. ”Hanbali Theology.” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Ed. Sabine schmidke. DOI: 101.1093/oxfordhb/97801996703.013.014.
  • Hurvitz, Nimrod. 1994. “Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal and the Formation of Islamic Orthodoxy,” PhD diss., Princeton University: Department of Near Eastern Studies.
  • Hurvitz, Nimrod. “Who is the Accused? The Interrogation of Aḥmad Ibn Hanbal.” Qantara 22, (2): 359-373. https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2001.v22.i2.217.
  • Ibn Fūrak, Muḥammad. 1985. Mushkil al-ḥadīth wa-bayānuh, Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
  • Ibn Fūrak, Muḥammad. 2005. Mujarrad maqālāt al-Shaykh al-Ashʿarī. Cairo: Maktabah al-Thaqāfah al-Dīniyyah.
  • Ibn Ḥibbān, Muḥammad. 2000. Kitāb al-Majrūḥīn min al-muḥaddithīn. Riyad: Dār al-Ṣumayʿī.
  • Ibn Khayr, Muḥammad. 1998. Fahrasat Ibn Khayr Ishbīlī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Ibn Qutaybah, ʿAbd Allāh. 1985. Al-Ikhtilāf fī l-lafẓ wa-l-radd ʿalá l-Jahmiyyah wa-l-Mushabbihah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • Ibn Qutaybah, ʿAbd Allāh. 1995. Taʾwīl mukhtalif al-ḥadīth, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • Ibn Rajab, ʿAbd al-Raḥman bin Aḥmad. 2001. Sharḥ ʿIlal al-Tirmidhī. Riyadh: Dār al-ʿAtāʾ.
  • Ibrahim, Mahmood. 1994. “Religious Inquisition as Social Policy: The Persecution of the Zanādiqa in the Early Abbasid Caliphate.” Arab Studies Quarterly 16, (2): 53-72.
  • Itr, Nūr al-Dīn. 1997. Manhaj al-naqd fī ʿulūm al-ḥadīth, Damascus: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir.
  • Kamali, Hashim. n.d. A Text book of Ḥadīth Studies. The Islamic Foundation.
  • al-Khāṭīb, ‘Ajāj (ed.). 1984. Introduction to al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī, Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Khaṭṭābī, Ḥamd bin Muḥammad. 1932. Maʿālim al-Sunan. Aleppo.
  • Librande, Leonard T. 1976. “Contrast in the two earliest manuals of ʿUlūm al-Ḥadīth: The Beginnings of the Genre.” Ph.D. diss., Canada: McGill University.
  • Librande, Leonard T. 2009. A Reconsideration of Ibn Khallād’s Place in the Buwayhid Lands. Der Islam, 57 (1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.1980.57.1.1. Madelung, Wilfred. 1985. Religious Schools and Sects in Medieval Islam. Britain: Variorum Reprints.
  • Makdisi, George. 1979. “The Significance of the Sunni Schools of Law in Islamic Religious History.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800053277.
  • al-Maqdisī, ʿAbd Allāh Ibn Qudāmah. 1998. al-Muntakhab min al-ʿilal li-l-Khallāl. Riyad: Dār al-Rāyah.
  • Melchert, Alexander. 2001. “Traditionist-jurisprudence and the framing of Islamic Law.” Islamic Law and Society 8, (3): 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851901317230639.
  • Mez, Adam. 1937. The Renaissance of Islam. Translated by Shalahuddin Khuda Bakhsh and D. S. Margoliouth. Patna: Jubilee Printing.
  • Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. 1431 H. Al-Tamyīz. Beirut: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
  • Noor, Umar Muhammad. “Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi and His Approach to Sifat Traditions.” International Journal of Academic Research in Bussiness and Social Sciences 9, (6): 326-336. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/5951.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 1983. Amthāl al-ḥadīth, Bombay: al-Dār al-Salafiyyah.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 1984. al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Edited by ʿAjāj al-Khaṭīb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Rāmahurmuzī, Abū Muḥammad. 2016. al-Muḥaddith al-fāṣil bayna l-rāwī wa-l-wāʿī. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥib al-Dīn Abū Zayd. Cairo: Dār al-Dhakhāʾir.
  • Sālim, ʿAmr Munʿim. N. D. Qawāʿid ḥadīthiyyah naṣṣa ʿalaihā al-muḥaqqiqūn wa-ghafala ʿanhā al-mushtaghilūn wa-amthilah ʿamaliyyah ʿalá baʿḍ akhṭāʾ al-shāʾiʿah fī taḥqīq al-asānīd. Sharjah: Maktabah al-ʿUmarayn al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • al-Sakhāwī, Muḥammad bin ʿAbd al-Raḥmān. 2003. Fatḥ al-mughīth bi-sharḥ alfiyyah al-ḥadīth. Beirut: Dār al-ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
  • al-Ṣāliḥī, ʿAli Rajab. 2009. Taḥqīq mabādiʾ al-ʿulūm al-aḥad ʿashar. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
  • al-Samʿanī, ʿAbd al-Karīm. 1988. al-Ansāb. Beirut: Dār al-Jinān.
  • al-Shahrastānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Karīm. 2005. Al-Milal wa-l-niḥal. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
  • al-Shawkānī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī. 1999. Itḥāf al-akābir bi-isnād al-dafātir. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm.
  • al-Sibāʿī, Muṣṭafá. 2003. Al-Sunnah wa-Makānatuhā fī al-Tashrīʿ al-Islāmī. Damascus: Dār al-Warrāq.
  • al-Ṭabarī, ʿAli bin Muḥammad. 2015. Taʾwīl al-āyāt al-mushkilah al-muwaḍḍaḥah wa-bayānuhā bi-l-ḥujaj wa-l-burhān. Cairo: Dār al-Āfāq al-ʿArabiyyah.
  • al-Ṭaḥḥān, Maḥmūd. 2010. Taysīr muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth. Riyad: Maktabah al-Maʿārif.
There are 55 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Religious Studies
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Umar Muhammad Noor 0000-0003-3128-3720

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Submission Date March 11, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

ISNAD Noor, Umar Muhammad. “Traditionist Internal Reform: Motives Behind the Birth of the First Manual of ʿUlūm Al-Ḥadīth”. Ilahiyat Studies 11/2 (December 2020), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2020.112.211.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank