Basic Principles of al-Ghazālī’s Method of Exegesis

Abstract

The allusive (ishārī) method of exegesis is the name given to the process of interpreting the Qurʾān depending on the particular type of knowledge called maʿrifah, which is accepted to be based on spiritual experience. In the ishārī exegesis, the meanings of the verses of the Qurʾān are revealed to the Sufi’s mind, and then, the Sufi expresses those senses through symbols and signs by employing an implicit style. Comprehensive and advanced works have been written over time in the field of ishārī exegesis, whose first examples were encountered in the early eras of Sufism. Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1111) wrote works in various fields such as fiqh (Islamic law), theology, philosophy, and Sufism. Although he did not have any complete book in the field of ishārī exegesis, his vast corpus is overflowing with his ishārī interpretations of verses of the Qurʾān. For this reason, he is recognized as one of the most influential figures in the field of ishārī exegesis. This article aims to determine the basic principles on which al-Ghazālī’s ishārī interpretations of the Qurʾān in his various works are built in the context of the basic principles of his understanding of the Qurʾān. The first part of the article emphasizes al-Ghazālī’s approach to the Qurʾān and his view of the Qurʾān and then attempts to determine the basic principles of the method of his ishārī exegesis. The third and last part of the study analyzed some ishārī interpretations of al-Ghazālī in his various works to better understand these principles.

Keywords

• Qurʾān
• al-Ghazālī
• the allusive (ishārī) method of exegesis
• explicit (ẓāhir)
• implicit (bāṭin)

References

1. Andani, Khalil. “The Merits of the Bāṭiniyya: Al-Ghazālī’s Appropriation of Ismaʿili Cosmology.” Journal of Islamic Studies 29, no: 2 (2018): 181-229. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etx054.
2. Ateş, Süleyman. İşârî Tefsir Okulu. Istanbul: Yeni Ufuklar Neşriyat, 1998.
3. Bruns, Gerald L. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
4. el-Câbirî, Muhammed Âbid. Arap-İslam Aklının Oluşumu. Translated by İbrahim Akbaba. Istanbul: Kitabevi Yayınları, 2001.
5. Cerrahoğlu, İsmail. Tefsir Tarihi. 2 vols. Ankara: Fecr Yayınevi, 1996.
6. Cündioğlu, Dücane. Keşf-i Kadim: İmam Gazâlî’ye Dâir. Istanbul: Kapı Yayınları, 2013.
7. el-Cürcânî, Abdülkâhir. Belâgatin Sırları: Esrâru’l-Belâgat. Translated by Zekeriya Çelik. Istanbul: Litera Yayıncılık, 2018.
8. Çelik, Muhammed. “İşarî Tefsirin Sınırları ve Elmalılı Hamdi Yazır’da İşarî Tefsîr.” Dicle Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi IV, no. 2 (2002): 1-28.

9. Çift, Salih. “İlk Dönem Tasavvuf Düşüncesinde Nûr Kavramı.” Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi XIII, no: 1 (2004): 139-157.
10. Dağlı, Caner. “Metaphor, Symbol, and Parable in the Qur’an.” In The Routledge Companion to the Qur’an, edited by George Archer, Maria M. Dakake, and Daniel A. Madigan, 191-199. New York: Routledge, 2021.
11. Dallal, Ahmad. “Ghazālī and the Perils of Interpretation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, no. 4 (2002): 773-787. https://doi.org/10.2307/3217616.
12. Demirci, Muhsin. Tefsir Tarihi. Istanbul: İFAV, 2016,
13. al-Dhahabī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. al-Tafsīr wa-l-mufassirūn. Cairo: Maktabāt al-wahbā, 1976.
14. Durmuş, İsmail. “Temsil.” In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA), XL, 434-435.
15. Frank, Richard M.. Creation and the Cosmic System: Al-Ghazâli & Avicenna. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1992.
16. Frank, Richard M. Al-Ghazālī and the Ash’arite School. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.
17. Garden, Kenneth. “Rhetorics of Revival: al-Ghazālī and his Modern Heirs.” In The Heritage of Islamo-Arabic Learning: Studies Presented to Wadad Kadi, ed. Maurice Pomerantz and Aram Shahin, 352-370. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
18. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Mishkāt al-anwār. Critical ed. Abū l-ʿAlāʾ ʿAfīfī. Cairo: Maktabāt al-ʿArabiyyah, 1964.
19. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm al-dīn. 5 vols. Cairo: al-Sharika al-Quds, 2012.
20. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. The Jewels of The Qur’ân. Translated by Muhammad Abul Quasem. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1977.
21. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Jawāhir al-Qurʾān. Critical ed. Muhammad Rashīd Riḍā. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm, 1990.
22. al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Fayṣal al-tafriqah bayna al-Islām wa-l-zandaqah. Edited by Maḥmuūd Bījū. Damascus: Maḥmuūd Bījū, 1993.
23. Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
24. Gördük, Yunus Emre. Tarihsel ve Metodolojik Açıdan İşârî Tefsir. Istanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2013.
25. Gündoğdu, Hakan. “Gazali’nin Teolojik Hermenötiğine Yorumlayıcı Bir Bakış.” İslâmî Araştırmalar Dergisi Gazâlî Özel Sayısı XIII, no. 3-4 (2000): 410-419.
26. Gürler, Kadir. “Kur’ân’ın Re’y İle Tefsirini Yasaklayan Rivâyetlere Eleştirel Bir Yaklaşım.” Gazi Üniversitesi Çorum İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 3, no. 5 (2004): 17-46.
27. Güven, Şahin. Kur’ân’ın Anlaşılması ve Yorumlanmasında Çokanlamlılık Sorunu. Istanbul: Denge Yayınları, 2005.
28. Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn al-Mukarram. Lisān al-ʿArab. 6 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Ṣadr, nd..
29. Kamal, Muhammad. “Al-Ghazali’s hermeneutics and phenomenology.” Religion East & West 4 (June), (2004): 77-89.
30. Knysh, Alexander D. “Sufism and the Qurʾān.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, ed. Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Leiden: Brill, 2006, V, 137-159.
31. Mårtensson, Ulrika. “Through the Lens of Modern Hermeneutics: Authorial Intention in al-Ṭabarī’s and al-Ghazālī’s Interpretations of Q. 24:35.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 11, no. 2 (2009): 20–48. DOI: 10.3366/E146535911000077X.
32. Mitha, Farouk. Al-Ghazālī’s and the Ismailis: a Debate on Reason and Authority in Medieval Islam. London: I.B. Tauris in association with The Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2001.
33. Okumuş, Mesut. Kur’ân’ın Çok Boyutlu Okunuşu: İmam Gazzâlî Örneği. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 2006.
34. Öztürk, Mustafa. Tefsirde Bâtınilik ve Bâtıni Te’vil Geleneği. Istanbul: Düşün Yayıncılık, 2011.
35. Sands, Kristin Zahra. Ṣūfī Commentaries on the Qurʼān in Classical Islam. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.
36. Selvi, Dilaver. “Her Âyetin Bir Zahiri Bir Bâtını Vardır Hadisindeki Zahir ve Batın Kavramları Üzerine Değerlendirmeler.” Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi XI, no. 2 (2011): 7-41.
37. Tatar, Burhanettin. “Gazali’de Metin-Yorum İlişkisi.” İslâmî Araştırmalar Dergisi Gazâlî Özel Sayısı XIII, no. 3-4 (2000): 429-440.
38. Treiger, Alexander. Inspired Knowledge in Islamic Thought: al-Ghazālī’s Theory of Mystical Cognition and its Avicennian Foundations. London: Routledge, 2012.
39. Whittingham, Martin. Al-Ghazālī and the Qurʾān: One Book, Many Meanings. Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
40. al-Zurqānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm. Manāhil al-ʿirfān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. 2 vols. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2001.