Research Article

The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles

Volume: 14 Number: 1 July 31, 2023
EN

The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles

Abstract

The transhumanist movement is characterized by a shift from the traditional understanding of the “created” and “born” human to a “produced” and potentially “immortal” human. This article argues that the reproductive policy of transhumanism is inconsistent. Firstly, it underestimates the implications of reproduction, especially those related to women, such as pregnancy, childbirth, and childrearing, which is considered a source of pain at every stage. Additionally, it prioritizes adult enhancement in pursuit of immortality, which is why it discards producing a new life. On the other hand, the movement utilizes new reproductive technologies to enhance human beings, thereby promising and providing unlimited individual reproductive freedom in a wide range of contexts. Furthermore, this article argues that transhumanism, which moves away from the concept of sexual human nature, not only excludes femininity and its associated nature but also converges towards a sexless human nature biologically. It also discharges sexuality from the purpose of reproduction and reduces it to the purpose of pleasure substantially. The overall attitude of the transhumanist context raises significant ethical problems, undermining traditional medical ethics and bioethics principles such as nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy, justice, and human dignity. Moreover, it forces ethical principles to be redefined on a new basis with its indifferent attitude that ignores the threat of authoritarian eugenics, neglects reproductive responsibility while emphasizing reproductive freedom, and fails to consider the nature of the contrast-dependency of human values. As a result, new ethical principles must be developed to address the implications of this attitude.

Keywords

Thanks

Ilahiyat Studies dergisine, ayırdığı zaman, enerji ve emek için teşekkür ederim.

References

  1. Andorno, Roberto. “The Dual Role of Human Dignity in Bioethics”. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (2013), 967-973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9373-5
  2. Annas, George J. - Andrews, Lori B. - Isasi, Rosario M. “Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations”. American Journal of Law & Medicine 28/2-3 (2002), 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S009885880001162X
  3. Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. San Diego - New York - London: Harvest/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1970.
  4. Arnold, Alec Andreas. The Technologization of Sexual Desire and the Future of Ecstatic Embodiment: A Catholic Response to Transhumanist Sexuality. Missouri: Saint Louis University, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2021.
  5. Baylis, Nicholas. “What is Your Mission in Life? Why Being Happy Should Not Be Your Priority”. In Unnatural Selection: The Challenges of Engineering Tomorrow’s People. Edited by Peter Healy - Steve Rayner. 167-174. London: Earthscan, 2009.
  6. Bergsma, Ad. “Transhumanism and the Wisdom of Old Genes: Is Neurotechnology a Source of Future Happiness?”. Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (2000), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010016532529
  7. Besnier, Jean-Michel. “On a Deadly Desire for Immortality. Concerning Transhumanism”. Cités 55/3 (2013), 13-23.https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.055.0013
  8. Bostrom, Nick. “Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective”. Journal of Value Inquiry 37/4 (2003), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INQU.0000019037.67783.d5

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Religious Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 31, 2023

Submission Date

November 4, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 17, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 14 Number: 1

APA
Kartal Soysal, E. (2023). The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. Ilahiyat Studies, 14(1), 9-50. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1199398
AMA
1.Kartal Soysal E. The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. IS. 2023;14(1):9-50. doi:10.12730/is.1199398
Chicago
Kartal Soysal, Esra. 2023. “The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles”. Ilahiyat Studies 14 (1): 9-50. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1199398.
EndNote
Kartal Soysal E (July 1, 2023) The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. Ilahiyat Studies 14 1 9–50.
IEEE
[1]E. Kartal Soysal, “The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles”, IS, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9–50, July 2023, doi: 10.12730/is.1199398.
ISNAD
Kartal Soysal, Esra. “The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles”. Ilahiyat Studies 14/1 (July 1, 2023): 9-50. https://doi.org/10.12730/is.1199398.
JAMA
1.Kartal Soysal E. The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. IS. 2023;14:9–50.
MLA
Kartal Soysal, Esra. “The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles”. Ilahiyat Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, July 2023, pp. 9-50, doi:10.12730/is.1199398.
Vancouver
1.Esra Kartal Soysal. The Production of Human Reproduction: Impacts of Transhumanism’s Inconsistent Reproductive Policy on Classical Ethical Principles. IS. 2023 Jul. 1;14(1):9-50. doi:10.12730/is.1199398

Cited By

SCImago Journal & Country Rank