This paper aims to explore the complex relationship between intellect, knowledge, and free will in the context of religious faith, īmān or fides. The paper focuses on the perspectives of two prominent theologians, Abū l-Muʿīn al-Nasafī (d. 508/1115) and Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274), from the Middle Ages. The study begins its investigation by looking into the aforementioned theologians’ ideas and interpretations related to the nature of religious faith. It then explores the specific roles assigned by al-Nasafī and Aquinas to intellect, assent, and free will in the act of faith. The article’s final section presents a comparative analysis of their perspectives, highlighting the similarities, differences, and potential tensions between their positions. The findings of this study suggest that Aquinas’ argument, which asserts that grounding faith in knowledge or evidence undermines human free will, may have certain problematic aspects. According to him, one necessarily assents to the proposition at hand if there is conclusive evidence. However, as for al-Nasafī, it appears that one can rely on evidence and exercise his/her free will in the act of faith if religious assent, taṣdīq or agnitio, is understood in a dual sense.
I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Professor Nicholas Adams and Dr Richard Todd, for their thoughtful comments and valuable feedback on my earlier drafts of this paper. I would also like to express my gratitude to the esteemed Professor İlyas Çelebi and my dear friend Dr Sami Turan Erel for their invaluable assistance in accessing and interpreting the Arabic materials used in this study.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Comparative Religious Studies |
Journal Section | Research Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 31, 2023 |
Submission Date | June 20, 2023 |
Published in Issue | Year 2023 |