BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2009, Issue: 22, 37 - 57, 01.09.2009

Ramazan Ertürk

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın gayesi modern felsefede ele alınan hükümlerin analitik-sentetik ayrımının temellendirilmesini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın temel iddiası bu ayrımı olumlayan kriterlerin geçerliliğinin problemli olduğunu ortaya koymak, ve bu sebeple ayrımın dayandığı temelin başka gayeler için kullanılabilecek kadar sağlam olmadığını göstermektir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma ayırımı esas alan argümanların geçerliliğinin tamamen sorgulanabilir mahiyette olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır.

An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage

Year 2009, Issue: 22, 37 - 57, 01.09.2009

Ramazan Ertürk

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the justification of the analytic-synthetic distinction of judgments in modern philosophy. The main argument of the paper is that the credibility of the criteria of the distinction is problematic and, therefore, the ground of the distinction is not solid enough to be used safely for other purposes. Hence, the validity of the arguments based on the distinction is highly questionable

Keywords

Analytic synthetic Kant judgments modern philosophy metaphysics

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ramazan Ertürk This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 22

Cite

APA Ertürk, R. (2009). An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi(22), 37-57.
AMA Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. September 2009;(22):37-57.
Chicago Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 22 (September 2009): 37-57.
EndNote Ertürk R (September 1, 2009) An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 37–57.
IEEE R. Ertürk, “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”, isad, no. 22, pp. 37–57, September 2009.
ISNAD Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 (September 2009), 37-57.
JAMA Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. 2009;:37–57.
MLA Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 22, 2009, pp. 37-57.
Vancouver Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. 2009(22):37-5.