Bu çalışmanın gayesi modern felsefede ele alınan hükümlerin analitik-sentetik ayrımının temellendirilmesini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın temel iddiası bu ayrımı olumlayan kriterlerin geçerliliğinin problemli olduğunu ortaya koymak, ve bu sebeple ayrımın dayandığı temelin başka gayeler için kullanılabilecek kadar sağlam olmadığını göstermektir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma ayırımı esas alan argümanların geçerliliğinin tamamen sorgulanabilir mahiyette olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır.
An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage
The aim of this paper is to investigate the justification of the analytic-synthetic distinction of judgments in modern philosophy. The main argument of the paper is that the credibility of the criteria of the distinction is problematic and, therefore, the ground of the distinction is not solid enough to be used safely for other purposes. Hence, the validity of the arguments based on the distinction is highly questionable
Ertürk, R. (2009). An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi(22), 37-57.
AMA
Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. September 2009;(22):37-57.
Chicago
Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 22 (September 2009): 37-57.
EndNote
Ertürk R (September 1, 2009) An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 37–57.
IEEE
R. Ertürk, “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”, isad, no. 22, pp. 37–57, September 2009.
ISNAD
Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 (September 2009), 37-57.
JAMA
Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. 2009;:37–57.
MLA
Ertürk, Ramazan. “An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage”. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 22, 2009, pp. 37-57.
Vancouver
Ertürk R. An Analytic-Synthetic Distinction of Judgments and the Credibility of Its Criteria and Usage. isad. 2009(22):37-5.
