Örgütsel Adaletin Çalışanların Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracılık Rolü

Öz

Çalışanların örgütsel adalet algısı pek çok örgütsel davranışın öncülüdür. Bu çalışma ile kamu ve özel sektörde faaliyet gösteren iki farklı çalışan grubunda örgütsel adaletin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Araştırmada kamu ve özel sektör çalışanlarının adalet, özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyeti algılamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, çalışanların dağıtım adaleti algılamalarının örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyetini anlamlı olarak etkilediği ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin dağıtım adaleti - işten ayrılma niyeti arasında aracılık rolü üstlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, oluşturulan yapısal eşitlik modeli uyum iyiliği değerlerinin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiş ve ortaya konulan yapısal modelin veriye uygun olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Prosedür Adaleti, Dağıtım Adaleti, Etkileşim Adaleti, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, İşten Ayrılma Niyeti

The Effect Of Organizatıonal Justice And Organizational Identification On Employee’s Turnover Intention : The Mediating Effect Of Organizational Identification

Abstract

Employee’s organizational justice perception is the pioneer of organizational behaviors. Effects of organizational justice on organizational identification and turnover intention is searched at the two different employee’s group from public and private sector in this study. It is determined at the study that there is a reasonable difference between public and private sector employees’ perception of justice, identification and turnover intention. Results show that employee’s distributive justice perception effects reasonably organizational identification. It has also showed that turnover intention and organizational identification has a mediator role between distributive justice and turnover intention. According to the results it is determined that composed structural equation model’s goodness of fit values are at the reasonable level and the composed structural equation model is proper for data.

Keywords

• Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, Interactional Justice, Organizational Identification, Turnover Intention

References

1. Adams, J.S. (1963) “Toward an Understan- ding of Inequity” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, ss. 422-436.
2. Adams, J.S. (1965) “Inequity in Social Exc- hange”, içinde Berkowitz, L (Ed.), Ad- vances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York London, Vol.2, ss.267-299.
3. Alexander, S. ve Ruderman, M. (1987) “The Role of Procedural and Distributive Jus- tice in Organizational Behavior, .Social Justice Research, 1: 177-98.
4. Alexander, S., Sinclair, R.R. ve Tetrick, L.E. (1995) “The Role of Organizational Jus- tice in Defining and Maintaining the Employment Relationship” içinde Tet- rick, L.E. and Barling, J. (Ed.) Changing Employment Relations: Behavioral and Social Perspectives. Washington, Dc: American Psychological Association.
5. Ang, S., Dyne, L. V. ve Begley T. M., (2003) “The Employment Relationships of Fo- reign Workers versus Local Employees: a Field Study of Organizational Justice, Job Satisfaction, Performance and OCB”, Journal of Organizational Beha- vior, 24, ss.561–583.
6. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael F. (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organizati- ons”, Academy of Management Re- view, 14, 20-39.
7. Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., ve Pugh, S. D. (2005) “Exploring the Role of Emotions in Injustice Perceptions and Retalia- tion”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, ss.629–643.
8. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinc- tion in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, ss.1173-1182.

9. Beugre, C.D. (1998) Managing Faimess in Organization,. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
10. Bhattacharya, R., (1998) “A Formal Model of Trsut Based on Outcomes”, Academy of Management Review, 23:3.
11. Brashear, B. ve Zinta, S. (2005), “Fairness Re- duces the Negative Effects of Organiza- tional Politics on Turnover Intentions, Citizenship Behavior and Job Perfor- mance”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2.
12. Brett, J. M. ve Goldberg, S. B. (1983) “Me- diator-Advisors: A New Third-Party Role” Bazerman, M. ve Lewicki, R. (Ed.), Research on Negotiations in Or- ganizations, Greenwich, Ct: Jaı Pres, ss.81-90.
13. Byrne Z. S. (2005) “Fairness Reduces the Ne- gative Effects of Organizational Politics on Turnover Intentions, Citizenship Be- havior and Job Performance, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2.
14. Chang E., (2002) “Distributive Justice and Organizational Commitment Revisited: Moderation by Layoff in the Case of Ko- rean Employees”, Human Resource Management, Summer, Vol. 41, No. 2.
15. Chebat, J., ve Slusarczyk, W. (2005) “How Emotions Mediate the Effects of Percei- ved Injustice on Loyalty in Service Re- cover Situations: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Business Research, 58, ss.664– 673.
16. Cheney, G. (1983) “On the Various and Changing Meaning of Organizational Membership: a Field Study of Organi- zational Identification”, Communica- tion Monographs, 50.
17. Colquitt, J. a., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., ve Ng, K. Y. (2001). “Justice At the Millennium: a Meta- Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organi- zational Justice Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
18. Cropanzano, R., Folger, R., (1991) “Procedu- ral Justice and Worker Motivation” içinde Steers, R.M., Porter, L.W. (Eds.), Motivation and Work Behavior. Mcgraw-Hill, New York.
19. Cropanzano, R. S, Randall, M. (1993) “Justice in the Workplace: a Historical Review” içinde Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management Erl- baum, Hillsdale, NJ, ss. 3–20.
20. Cropanzano, R.S. ve Kackmar, K.M. (1995) Organizational Politics, Justice and Sup- port: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace, Westport, Ct: Quorum Books.
21. Cropanzano, R.S. ve Randall, M.L. (1993) “Injustice and Work Behaviour: a His- torical Review” içinde Cropanzano, R.S. (Ed.) Justice in the Workplace: Appro- aching Faimess in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum, ss. 3-20.
22. Deconinck, J. B., Stilwell, C. D. (2004) “In- corporating Organizational Justice, Role States, Pay Satisfaction and Supervisor Satisfaction in a Model of Turnover In- tentions”, Journal of Business Research, 57, ss. 225– 231.
23. Deconninck, J., (2005) “An Analysis of Tur- nover Amaong Retail Buyers”, içinde Bachmann, D. (Ed.) Journal of Business Research, Vol.58, ss. 874- 882.
24. Decremer, D., (2006) ”When Authorities In- fluence Followers” Affect: the Interac- tive Effect of Procedural Justice and Transformational Leadership”, Euro- pean Journal of Work and Organizatio- nal Psychology, 15, , ss.322–351.
25. Dreher, G. F. (1982). “The Role of Perfor- mance in the Turnover Process, the Academy of Management Journal, 25,1: 137-174.
26. Dutton, J. Dukerich, J.ve Harquail, C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Adminis- trative Science Quarterly,34.
27. Fields, D., Pang, M., Chiu, C., (2000) “A Comparative Field Study of the Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice in Hong Kong.” Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21 (5), ss.547–562.
28. Folger, R, Konovsky, M. A. (1989), “Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions To Pay Raise Decisions”, Academic Management Journal, 32(1), ss.115– 30.
29. Folger, R. (1989) “Significance Tests and the Duplicity of Binary Decisions”, Psycho- logical Bulletin, 106, ss.155-160.
30. Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, R.S., (1998), Or- ganizational Justice and Human Reso- urce Management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
31. Fryxell, G.E. ve Gordon, M.E. (1989) “Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction As Predictors with Unions and Mana- gement”, Academy of Management Joumal, 32, ss.851-66.
32. Gordon, M.E. ve Fryxell, G.E. (1993) “The Role of Interpersonal Justice in Organi- zational Grievance Systems” içinde Cropanzano, R. (Ed.) Justice in Tiie Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resources Management. Hills- dale, Nj: Lawrence Eribaum, ss. 231-55.
33. Greenberg, J. (1987) “A Taxonomy of Orga- nizational Justice Theories”, Academy of Management Review, 12, ss. 9-22.
34. Greenberg, J. (1988) “Cultivating an Image of Faimess: Looking Fair on the Job”, Jo- urnal of Applied Psychology. 73, ss.606- 13.
35. Greenberg, J. (1990) “Looking Fair Us Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organi- zational Justice” ,(Ed.) Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L., Research in Organiza- tional Behavior, Jai Press, Greenwich, Ct, Vol. 12, ss.111-57.
36. Greenberg, J. (1993) “Justice and Organiza- tional Citizenship: A Commentary on the State of Science”, Empioyee Res- ponsibility and Rights Joumal. 6, ss.249-56.
37. Greenberg, J. (1996) The Quest For Justice: Es.Says and Experiments, Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
38. Greenberg, J. (1996), The Quest For Justice: Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
39. Griffeth, R.W. Hom, P.W. ve Gaertner, (2000). a Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications For the Next Millennium, Journal of Management, Vol.3, ss.463- 488.
40. Hartley, J. (1995) “Challenge and Change in Employment Relations: Issues For Psychology, Trade Unions and Mana- gers” içinde Tetrick, L.E. ve Barling, J. (Ed.) Changing Empioyment Relations: Behavioural and Social Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psycholo- gical Association.
41. Jackofsky, E. F. (1984) “Turnover and Job Performance: an Integrated Process Model”,The Academy of Management, Vol.9, ss. 74-83.
42. Joreskog, K. G. ve Sorbom, D.(1993) Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chi- cago, IL: Scientific International Soft- ware.
43. Karaeminoğulları, A. (2006), Öğretim Ele- manlarının Örgütsel Adalet Algıları İle Sergiledikleri Üretkenliğe Aykırı Dav- ranışlar Arasındaki İlişki ve Bir Araş- tırma, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
44. Kline, R. B., (1998) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: the Guilford Press.
45. Kreiner, G. E. ve Ashforth, B. E. (2004) “Evi- dence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25.
46. Küçükusta, D. (2007), Konaklama İşletmele- rinde İş-Yaşam Dengesinin Çalışma Ya- şamı Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İzmir.
47. Leventhal, G. S. (1980) “What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relations- hips” içinde Gergen, K. Greenberg, M., ve Willis, R. (Ed.), Social Exchange: Ad- vances in Theory and Research ,New York: Plenum Pres, ss. 27–55
48. Lind, E.A. ve Tyler, T.R.(1988) The Social Psychoiogy of Procedural Justice, New York and London: Plenum Pres.
49. Lind, E.A. (1995) “Justice and Authority in Organizations” içinde Cropanzano, R. ve Kacmar, K.M. (Ed.) Organizational Politics, Justice and Support. Westport, Ct: Quorum Books, ss. 83-96.
50. Lindquist, T. M. (1995), “Fairness As an An- tecedent To Participative Budgeting: Examining the Effects of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice and Referent Cognitions on Satisfaction and Perfor- mance”, Journal of Management Acco- unting Research, Volume Seven, Fall.
51. Mael ,F. ve Tetrick, L.E. (1992) “Identifying Organizational Identification”, Educa- tional and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.
52. Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: a Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizatio- nal Behavior, Vol 13.
53. Mcfarlin, D., ve Sweeney, P. (1992). Distri- butive and Procedural Justice As Pre- dictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626–637.
54. Mcfarlin, D.B. ve Sweeney, P.D. (1992) “Dis- tributive and Procedural Justice As Pre- dictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes” , Academy of Management Journal, 353, ss. 626- 637.
55. Mİao, C. F.ve Evans, K. R. (2007) “The Im- pact of Salesperson Motivation on Role Perceptions and Job Performance—a Cognitive and Affective Perspective”, Journal of Personal Selling ve Sales Ma- nagement, Vol. XXVII, No., ss. 89–101.
56. Mignonac, K. ve Herrbach, O., Guerrero, S. “The interactive Evects of Perceived Ex- ternal Prestige and Need For Organiza- tional İdentification on Turnover Intentions”, Journal of Organizational ,27, ss. 571–584.
57. Millissa F. Y. Cheung ve Monica C. C. (2008) “Law, Relationships of Organizational Justice and Organizational Identifica- tion: the Mediating Effects of Perceived Organizational Support in Hong Kong”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, ss.213–231.
58. Moore, B. (1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. Whaite Plains, N.Y:M.E. Sharpe.
59. Moorman, R.H. (1991). “Relationship Bet- ween Organizational Justice and Orga- nizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Emplo- yee Citizenship?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, s.6.
60. Mowday, R.T. (1987) Equity Theory Predic- tions of Behavior in Organizations, içinde Steers M.R. Porter, L.W. (Ed), Motivation and Work Behavior (4. Ed), Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 89-110.
61. Nadiri, H.ve Tanova, C., (2009) “An investi- gation of the Role of Justice in Turnover intentions, Job Satisfaction, and Organi- zational Citizenship Behavior in Hospi- tality Industry”, International Journal of Hospitality Management.
62. Niehoff, R.T., Moorman, R.H, (1993). Justice As a Mediator of the Relationship Bet- weenmethods of Monitoring and Orga- nizational Citizenship Behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 36.
63. Nurse L. (2005) “Performance Appraisal, Employee Development and Organiza- tional Justice: Exploring the Linkages”, Int. J. of Human Resource Management, 16:7, ss. 1176-1194.
64. Okun, A. M. (1975) Equality and Efficiency: the Big Traide off, The Brookings Insti- tution, Washington DC.
65. Olkkonen M.E. ve Lipponen, J. (2006) “Rela- tionships Between Organizational Jus- tice, İdentiwcation withorganization and Work Unit, and Group-Related Outcomes”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100, ss.202–215.
66. Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003) “Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Bireyler Arası Saldırgan Dav- ranışlar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Belirlen- mesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fa- kültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 21: 77-96.
67. Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R. ve Boulian, P. (1973), “Organizational Commit- ment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians”, Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, No 5, ss.603-609.
68. Pratt, M.G. (1998) “To Be Or Not To Be”: Centarl Question in Organizational Identification” Identity” içinde Whetten D.A ve Godfrey P.C.(Ed) Organizati- ons: Building Theory Through Conver- sation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69. Rusbelt, F., Rogers, M. (1998) “Impact of Exc- hange Variables on Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect: an Integrative Model of Responses to Decline Job Satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.31 No:2, ss.599-627.
70. Scott, S.G. ve Lane, V.R. (2000) “A Stakehol- der Approach To Organizational Iden- tity”, Academy of Management Review, 25 :1.
71. Sekaran, U. (1992) Research Methods For Bu- siness, Canada: John Wiley ve Sons, Inc.
72. Shaw, J.D., Delery, J.E., Jenkins, G.D., Gupta, N., (1998) “An Organization-Level Analysis of Voluntary and Involuntary Turnover. Academy of management Review , 41 (5), 511–525.
73. Sheppard, B.H., Lewicki, R.J. ve Minton, J.W. (1992) Organizational Justice: the Search For Faimess in the Workplace New York: Lexington Books.
74. Smitdhs, a. Pryun, a. ve Van Riel, C.B.M. (2001), “The Impact of Employee Com- munication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identifica- tion”, Academy of Management Jour- nal, 44:5.
75. Steensma, H. ve Vİsser, E. (2007), “Procedu- ral Justice and Supervisors” Personal Power Bases: Effects on Employees” Perceptions of Performance Appraisal Sessions”, Commitment, and Motiva- tion,” J. Collective Negotiations, Vol. 312, ss. 101-118.
76. Sweeney, P. D. ve Mcfarlin, D. B. (1997) “Process and Outcome: Gender Diffe- rences in the Assessment of Justice”, Jo- urnal of Organizational Behavior 18 (1): 83-98.
77. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007) Yapısal Eşitlik Modelle- mesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve Lisrel Uy- gulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.
78. Tang, T. L., Sarsfield B. ve Linda J. (1996) Distributive and Procedural Justice As Related to Satisfaction and Commit- ment, Advanced Management Journal, C. 61, s.3.
79. Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., Renard, M.K., Har- rison, J.K. ve Carroll, S.J. (1995) “Due Process in Performance Appraisal: a Quasi-Experiment in Procedural Jus- tice”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, ss.495-523.
80. Thibaut, J. ve Walker, L. (1978) A Theory of Procedure, California Law Review, 66, ss.541–566.
81. Thibaut, J., ve Walker, L. (1975) Procedural Justice: a Psychological Analysis. Hills- dale, Nj: Erlbaum.
82. Tompkins, P.K. ve Cheney, G. (1985) “Com- munication and Unobtrusive Control in Contemporary Organizations”, R.D. Mcphee ve P.K. Tompkins (Der). Or- ganzaitional Communication: Traditio- nal Themes and New Directions, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
83. Tornblom, K.Y., (1990) “The Social Psycho- logy of Distributive Justice” içinde Scherer K.(Ed), the Nature and Admi- nistration of Justice:Interdiciplinary Approaches.Cambridge, England:Cam- bridge University Pres
84. Tüzün, İ. K. (2006), Örgütsel Güven, Örgüt- sel Kimlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İliş- kisi; Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara,
85. Van Dick, R., Christw, O., Stellmacherw, J., Wagnerw, U., Ahlswedew, O., Grub- baw, C., Hauptmeierw, M., Hfeldw H., C. Moltzenw, K., ve Tissington, P. A. (2004) “Should I Stay Or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction”, British Journal of Mana- gement, Vol. 15, ss.351–360.
86. Van Knippenberg, D. ve Sleebos, E. (2006) “Organizational Identification versus Organizational Commitment: Self-Defi- nition, Social Exchange, and Job Attitu- des”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, ss. 571–584.
87. Van Knippenberg, D. ve Van Schie E.C.M. (2000) “Foci Correlates of Organizatio- nal Identification”, Journal of Occupa- tional and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
88. Wayne S.J., Shore L. M. ve Linden R. C. (1997) “Perceived Organizational Sup- port and Leader Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40.
89. Williams, S. (1999) “The Effect of Distrıbu- tive and Prosedural Fustice on Perfor- mance”, the Journal of Psychology, 1332, ss.183-193.
90. Wood, R.C., (1997) “Personnel Management, Labour Turnover and the Role of Trade Unions” içinde Wood, R.C. (Ed.), Wor- king in Hotels and Catering. Internatio- nal Thompson Business Press, Oxford.
91. Zapata-Phelan, C. P., Colquitt, J. A , Scott, B. A. ve Livingston, B., (2009) “Proce- dural Justice, Interactional Justice and Task Performance: the Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces- ses, 108, ss.93–105.