Ev İçi Teknolojileri ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet

Abstract

Teknolojinin, yaşamın her alanında büyük etkilere sahip olduğu yadsınamaz bir gerçekliktir. Bu etkilerin toplumsal ilişkiler sistemi içinde nasıl kurgulandığı ise üzerinde dikkatle düşünülmesi gereken bir sorudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, teknoloji ve toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkilerini, ev içi teknolojilerin gelişimi örneğinde inceleyerek, ev içi teknolojilerin toplumsal cinsiyetçi rolleri yeniden üretip, üretmediğini, bu konudaki yaklaşımlar ve yapılan araştırmalar temelinde, ortaya çıkarmaktır. Toplumsal cinsiyet ve teknoloji ilişkilerini konu alan teorik yaklaşımlar, ev içi teknolojilerin geleneksel cinsiyetçi roller çerçevesinde, sosyal olarak belirlendiğini ileri sürmektedir. Bu alana yönelik yapılan çalışmalar, söz konusu teknolojilerin toplumsal cinsiyetçi rolleri yeniden ürettiğini ve nadir olarak kadınların ücretsiz ev içi çalışma zamanını azalttığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Teknoloji, toplumsal cinsiyet, ev içi teknolojiler, kadın emeği, ev içi çalışma zamanı

Abstract

Technology has profound effects on the every aspect of social life. It is necessary to think that how these effects are constructed in social relations system. This study is aimed at exploring the relations between technology and gender concerning with development of domestic technology. It also tries to explore whether domestic technology reproduce gender roles or not based on the perspectives and case studies focused on gender-technology relations. These approaches claim that technology is shaped by socially in the framework of traditional gender roles. The case studies focused on this issue show that domestic technology reproduces gender roles in domestic space and rarely reduces women’s unpaid domestic working time

Keywords

• Technology, gender, domestic technology, women labour, domestic working time

References

1. Ansal,Hacer.(1985), Değişik Perspektiflerden Teknoloji", İktisat Dergisi,
2. No.246, İktisat Fakültesi Mezunları Cemiyet Yayını, 19:24. Ansal, Hacer (1989), Kapitalist Üretimde Cinsiyetçilik", Onbirinci Tez Kitap Dizisi, No.9,
3. Uluslararası Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 8-22. Basalla,George(2000), Teknolojinin Evrimi, (çev:C. Soydemir), Tübitak Yayınları, Ankara.
4. Bell, Genevieve ve Kaye, Joseph (2002)., “Designing Technology for Domestic
5. Spaces”, Gastronomica, 1-16. Berg, Anne-Jorunn( 1993)., “A gendered socio-technical construction : The Smart House”, The Social Shaping of Technology (ed: Mc Kenzie,D ve Wajcman, J), Buckingham Open University Press, 301-313.
6. Bittman, Michael; Rice,James.M ve Wajcman,Judy(2004), “Appliances and their impact : the ownership of domestic technology and time spent on household work”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol:55, Issue:3, 401- 423.
7. Clegg, Sue (2001).,” Theorising The Machine: Gender, Education and Computing”, Gender and Education, Vol:13, No:3, 307-324.
8. Clendinning, Anne.(1998)., “Gas and Water Feminism: Maud Adeline Brereton and Edwardian Domestic Technology “, Canadian Journal of History, April , 1-24.

9. Cockburn, C. ve Ormrod, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making,London Sage Publications.
10. Cowan, Ruth,S(1993)., “The Industrial Revolution in The Home”, The Social
11. Shaping of Technology (ed: Mc Kenzie,D ve Wajcman, J), Buckingham Open University Press, 269-280. Doorly, Moyra.(1993).,”A Woman’s place: Doleres Hayden on the Grand
12. Domestic Revolution”, The Social Shaping of Technology (ed: Mc Kenzie,D ve Wajcman, J), Buckingham Open University Press, 314-317. Durack, Katherine,T.(1997)., “Gender,Technology and History of Technical
13. Communication”, Technical Communication Quarterly, Vol:6, No:3, p: 249-260. Faulkner, W.(2000), “The Technolgy Question in Feminism: A View from Feminist
14. Technology Studies” paper for publication in Women’s Studies International Forum 2000.
15. Habib, Laurence ve Cornford, Tony (2001), Computers in the home: Domestic
16. Technology and Process of Domestication, Global Cooperation in The New Millennium, The 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia, June 27-29 2001
17. Harding, Sandra ve Mc Gregor, E.(1996). “The Gender Dimension of Science and Technology “, International Network News, Vol:22, Issue:3 , 14-17.
18. Henwood, Flis. (1996). “WISE Choices? Understanding Occupational Decision- making in a Climate of Equal Opportunities for Women in Science and Technology”, Gender and Education, 8(2), 199-214.
19. Lippe, Tanja; Tijdens, Kea ve Ruitjer, Esther.(2004), “Outsourcing of Domestic
20. Tasks and Time- Saving Effects”, Journal of Family Studies, Vol:25, No:2, 216- Mc Kenzie, Donald ve Wajcman, Judy(1993)., “Introductory Essay”, The Social
21. Shaping of Technology (ed: Mc Kenzie,D ve Wajcman, J), Buckingham Open University Press, 2-25. Mc Kenzie, Donald ve Wajcman, Judy(1993).,”Introduction”, The Social
22. Shaping of Technology (ed: Mc Kenzie,D ve Wajcman, J), Buckingham Open University Press,:269-280. Pinch, Trevor ve Bijker, Wiebe. (1984). “The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each Other” Social Studies of Science , Vol:14, 399-441.
23. Robinson, Bonnie(1988)., “Housework and Domestic Technology “ Victorian
24. Britain An Encylopedia, (ed:Sally Mitchell), New York Garland Publishing, 377- Savcı, İlkay(1999),” Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Teknoloji”, A.Ü SBF Dergisi, 54(1), 142.
25. Shapiro, Sutuart(1998)., “Places and Spaces: The Historical Interaction of
26. Technology, Home and Privacy”, The Information Society, Vol:14, 275-284. Selek, Mehmet(1982), Marksist Değer Teorisi, A.Ü, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yyaınları, No:484, Ankara.
27. Silva, Elizabeth,B(2000), “The Cook, The Cooker and Gendering of the kitchen”, Sociological Review, Vol:48, Issue:4, 612-628.
28. Stanworth , Celia (2000)., “Women and Work in information Age”, Gender,