BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2014, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 76 - 93, 01.09.2014

Arş. Gör. Özgür Ayhan Doç. Dr. Sait Gürbüz

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of perceived organizational politics on organizational citizenship behaviour and to reveal the mediating role of organizational justice on that relationship. The research hypotheses were tested among 229 white collar employees at the companies in public sector in the province of Ankara and Istanbul. Research results demonstrated that perceived organizational politics had significant effects on organizational justice however there was no relationship between perceived organizational politics and organizational citizenship behaviour. Furthermore, mediating role of organizational justice was not supported. Implications for future research on perceived organizational politics and practice were discussed.

Keywords

perceived organizational politics organizational justice organizational citizenship behavior

References

  • Ayhan, Ö. ve Gürbüz, S. (2013). Algılanan örgütse l politikanın çalışanların işte n ayrılma niye tine e tkisinde duygusal bağlılığın rolü. Kamu ve öze l se ktör çalışanları üze rine bir araştırma. 21. Yöne timve Organizasyon Kongre si. 30 Mayıs-1 Kütahya. Haziran,
  • Ayhan, Ö. (2013). Algılanan örgütse l politikanın örgütse l adale t ve işte n ayrılma niye tine e tkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yükse k Lisans Te zi). Ge bze Yükse k Te knoloji Enstitüsü, Kocae li.
  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Ine quity in social e xchange . İçinde L. Be rkovitz (Ed.), Advances in experimentalsocial psychology(Cilt.2, ss. 267- 299). Ne w York: Acade micPre ss. Andre ws, M.C. ve Kacmar, K.M. among (2001).Discriminating organizational politics, justice and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior,22, 347- 366.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Ke nny, D. A. (1986). The mode rator me diator variable distinction in social psychological strate gic and statistical conside rations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Conce ptual,
  • Blau, M.P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Ne w York: Wile y.
  • Bodla, M. ve Danish, R.Q., (2009).Politics and workplace : An e mpirical e xamination of the re lationship be twe e n pe rce ive d organizational pe rformance . South Asian Journal of Management, 16, 44-62 and work
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applie d re se arch. Ne w York: The Guilford Pre ss.
  • Buchanan, D.A. (2008). You stab my back, I'll stab yours: Manage me nt e xpe rie nce and pe rce ption be haviour. British Journal of Management, 19, 49-64. political
  • Byrne , Z.S. (2005). Fairne ss re duce the ne gative e ffe cts of organizational politics on turnove r inte ntions, citize nship be havior and job pe rformance. Journal of Business and Psychology,20, 175-200.
  • Chan, C.H., Rose n, C.C. ve Le vy, P.E. (2009). The re lationship be twe e n pe rce ptions of organizational politics and e mploye e attitude s, strain, and be havior: A me ta - analytic Management, 52, 779-801. Academy of
  • Colquitt, J., Le Pine , J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Zapata, C.P. ve Rich, B.L. (2011). Explaining the justice – pe rformance e xchange de epener or trust as unce rtainty re duce r?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 1-15.
  • Cropanzano, R.S., Kacmar. K.M. ve Boze man, D.P. (1995).Organizational politics, justice , and support: The ir diffe re nce s and similaritie s (pp. I-IX). İçinde R.S. Cropanzano & K.M. Kacmar (Eds.).Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work. We stport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Cropanzano, R., Howe s, J. C., Grande y, A.A. ve Toth, organizational politics and support to work be haviors, attitude s, and stre ss. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
  • Drory, A. ve Romm, T. (1989).Politics in organization and its pe rce ption within the organization. Organization Studies, 9,165- 179.
  • Drory, A. (1993). Pe rce ived political climate and job attitude s. Organizational Studies 14,59 –71.
  • Farh, J., Podsakoff, P.M. ve Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citize nship be havior: Le ade r fairne ss and task scope ve rsus satisfaction. Journal of Management , 16, 705-21.
  • Fe rris, G.R. ve Kacmar, K.M.(1992). Pe rce ption of organizational Management, 18, 93-116. Journal of
  • Fe rris, G.R., Fe dor, D.B., Chache re , J. G. ve Pondy, L. R. (1989). Myths and politics in organizational Organization Studies, 14, 83-103. Group and
  • Fe rris, G.R., Frink, D.D., Galang, M.C., Zhou, J., Kacmar, K.M. ve Howard, J.E. (1996). Pe rce ptions of organizational politics: Pre diction, stre ss-relate d implications, and outcome s. Human Relations, 49, 233–266.
  • Grant, A.M. ve Maye r, D.M. (2009). Good soldie rs and good actors: Prosocial and impre ssion manage me nt motive s as inte ractive pre dictors be haviors. Journal of Applied Psychology,94, 900-912. citize nship
  • Gre e nberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice the orie s. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2007).Yöne ticile rin örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışlarının iş tatmini ve algıladıkları örgütse l adale t ile ilişkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Te zi). İstanbul Ünive rsite si; İstanbul. Gürbüz,S., Me rt,
  • İ.S.,(2009).Örgütse l ge çe rlik ölçe ğinin
  • uygulaması: Kamuda görgül bir çalışma.
  • Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 42, 117-139.
  • Harris, K.J., Andre ws, M.C. ve Kacmar, M.K. (2007). The mode rating e ffe cts of justice on the re lationship politics and work place attitude . Journal of Business Psychology, 22, 135- 144.
  • Hochwarte r, W.A., Witt, L.A. ve Kacmar, K.M. (1997).Pe rce ptions politics as a mode rator of the re lationship be twe e n conscie ntiousne ss and job pe rformance . Southe rn Manage me nt Association Me e ting, Atlanta, GA.
  • Homans, G.C. (1961 ). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Ne w York: Harcourt, Brace , and World.
  • İşcan, Ö.F. (2005). Siyasal are na me taforu olarak örgütle r ve örgütse l siyase tin örgütse l adale t algısına e tkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 60, 149-171.
  • Jöre skog, K.G. ve Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.8 for
  • Windows [Compute r software ].
  • IL: Scie ntific Software Inte rnational, Inc. Skokie ,
  • Kacmar, K.M. ve Fe rris, G.R. (1991). Pe rce ptions of organizational politic sscale (POPS): De ve lopme nt and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 193-205.
  • Kacmar, K.M. ve D.S. Carlson (1997). Furthe r validation politicsscale (POPS): A multiple sample inve stigation. Journal of Management, 23, 627- 658. pe rce ptions of of organizational politics.
  • Nie hoff, B.P. ve Moorman, R.H. (1993).Justice as a me diator of the re lationship be twe e n me thods of monitoring and organizational citize nship Management Journal, 36, 527-556. Academy of
  • Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Le xington, MA: Le xington Books.
  • Organ, D.W. ve Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive ve rsus organizational Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164. be haviour,
  • Özde ve cioğlu, M. (2002). Kamu ve öze l se ctor yöne ticile ri arasındaki davranışsal çalışma koşulları be lirle nme sine yöne lik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 115-134. farklılıklarının
  • Parke r, C.P., Dipboye , R.L., ve Jackson, S.L. (1995). Pe rce ptions of organizational politics: An inve stigation conse que nce s. Journal of Management , 21, 891–912. and
  • Ram, P. ve Prabhakar, G.V. (2010).Le adership style s and pe rce ive d organizational politics as pre dictors of work re late d outcome s. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15, 40-55.
  • Randall, M.L., Cropanzano, R., Borma n, C.A. ve Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as pre dictors of work attitude s, job pe rformance , and organizational citize nship be havior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159-174.
  • Rose n, C.C., Le vy, P.E. ve Hall, R.J. (2006). Placing pe rce ptions of politics in the conte xt of the fe e dback e nvironment, e mployee attitudes, and job pe rformance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 211-220.
  • Sargut, A.S. (2010). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim. Ankara: İmge Kitabe vi Yayınları.
  • Se rt, M. (2013).Örgütse l adale t, bağlılık ve örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi üze rine bir me ta-analizi. (Yayımlanmamış Yükse k Lisans Te zi). Kara Harp Okulu, Ankara.
  • Songür, N., Basım, H.N. ve Şe şe n, H. (2008). Örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışında adaletin öncüllük rolü. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41, 79- 100.
  • Ye n, W.W., Che n, S.C. ve Ye n, S.I. (2009).The impact of pe rceptions of organizational politics on workplace frie ndship. African Journal of Business Management, 3, 548-554.
  • Tyle r, T.R. ve Lind, E.A. (1992).A relational model of authority in groups. İçinde M.P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (ss. 115–191). 25 San Die go, CA: Acade mic Pre ss.
  • Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitude s, and workout come s: Exploration and implications for the public se ctor. Journal of Vocational Behavior 57, 326 -347. Vigoda-Gadot, E. ve Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational Politics and Job Outcome s: The mode rating e ffe cts of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2829-2861.
  • Williams, L.J. ve Ande rson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction commitme nt organizational citize nship and in-role be haviors, Journal of Management, 17, 601- 617.
  • organizational pre dictors of

Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü

Year 2014, Volume: 16 Issue: 3, 76 - 93, 01.09.2014

Arş. Gör. Özgür Ayhan Doç. Dr. Sait Gürbüz

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı; algılanan örgütsel politikanın (AÖP), örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı (ÖVD) üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmek ve bu ilişkide örgütsel adaletin aracılık rolünün olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Bu amaçla oluşturulan hipotezler, İstanbul ve Ankara'da faaliyet gösteren kamu kurumlarından kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilmiş 229 beyaz yakalı çalışandan oluşan bir örneklem üzerinde test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular neticesinde, AÖP'nin örgütsel adalet üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu, ancak ÖVD üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir.Ayrıca, örgütsel adaletin aracılık rolü tespit edilememiştir. Araştırmada AÖP konusunda yapılacak çalışmalara öneriler ile uygulamaya olan katkısına değinilmiştir

Keywords

algılanan örgütsel politika örgütsel adalet örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı

References

  • Ayhan, Ö. ve Gürbüz, S. (2013). Algılanan örgütse l politikanın çalışanların işte n ayrılma niye tine e tkisinde duygusal bağlılığın rolü. Kamu ve öze l se ktör çalışanları üze rine bir araştırma. 21. Yöne timve Organizasyon Kongre si. 30 Mayıs-1 Kütahya. Haziran,
  • Ayhan, Ö. (2013). Algılanan örgütse l politikanın örgütse l adale t ve işte n ayrılma niye tine e tkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yükse k Lisans Te zi). Ge bze Yükse k Te knoloji Enstitüsü, Kocae li.
  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Ine quity in social e xchange . İçinde L. Be rkovitz (Ed.), Advances in experimentalsocial psychology(Cilt.2, ss. 267- 299). Ne w York: Acade micPre ss. Andre ws, M.C. ve Kacmar, K.M. among (2001).Discriminating organizational politics, justice and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior,22, 347- 366.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Ke nny, D. A. (1986). The mode rator me diator variable distinction in social psychological strate gic and statistical conside rations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Conce ptual,
  • Blau, M.P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. Ne w York: Wile y.
  • Bodla, M. ve Danish, R.Q., (2009).Politics and workplace : An e mpirical e xamination of the re lationship be twe e n pe rce ive d organizational pe rformance . South Asian Journal of Management, 16, 44-62 and work
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applie d re se arch. Ne w York: The Guilford Pre ss.
  • Buchanan, D.A. (2008). You stab my back, I'll stab yours: Manage me nt e xpe rie nce and pe rce ption be haviour. British Journal of Management, 19, 49-64. political
  • Byrne , Z.S. (2005). Fairne ss re duce the ne gative e ffe cts of organizational politics on turnove r inte ntions, citize nship be havior and job pe rformance. Journal of Business and Psychology,20, 175-200.
  • Chan, C.H., Rose n, C.C. ve Le vy, P.E. (2009). The re lationship be twe e n pe rce ptions of organizational politics and e mploye e attitude s, strain, and be havior: A me ta - analytic Management, 52, 779-801. Academy of
  • Colquitt, J., Le Pine , J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Zapata, C.P. ve Rich, B.L. (2011). Explaining the justice – pe rformance e xchange de epener or trust as unce rtainty re duce r?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 1-15.
  • Cropanzano, R.S., Kacmar. K.M. ve Boze man, D.P. (1995).Organizational politics, justice , and support: The ir diffe re nce s and similaritie s (pp. I-IX). İçinde R.S. Cropanzano & K.M. Kacmar (Eds.).Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing social climate at work. We stport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Cropanzano, R., Howe s, J. C., Grande y, A.A. ve Toth, organizational politics and support to work be haviors, attitude s, and stre ss. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
  • Drory, A. ve Romm, T. (1989).Politics in organization and its pe rce ption within the organization. Organization Studies, 9,165- 179.
  • Drory, A. (1993). Pe rce ived political climate and job attitude s. Organizational Studies 14,59 –71.
  • Farh, J., Podsakoff, P.M. ve Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citize nship be havior: Le ade r fairne ss and task scope ve rsus satisfaction. Journal of Management , 16, 705-21.
  • Fe rris, G.R. ve Kacmar, K.M.(1992). Pe rce ption of organizational Management, 18, 93-116. Journal of
  • Fe rris, G.R., Fe dor, D.B., Chache re , J. G. ve Pondy, L. R. (1989). Myths and politics in organizational Organization Studies, 14, 83-103. Group and
  • Fe rris, G.R., Frink, D.D., Galang, M.C., Zhou, J., Kacmar, K.M. ve Howard, J.E. (1996). Pe rce ptions of organizational politics: Pre diction, stre ss-relate d implications, and outcome s. Human Relations, 49, 233–266.
  • Grant, A.M. ve Maye r, D.M. (2009). Good soldie rs and good actors: Prosocial and impre ssion manage me nt motive s as inte ractive pre dictors be haviors. Journal of Applied Psychology,94, 900-912. citize nship
  • Gre e nberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice the orie s. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2007).Yöne ticile rin örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışlarının iş tatmini ve algıladıkları örgütse l adale t ile ilişkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Te zi). İstanbul Ünive rsite si; İstanbul. Gürbüz,S., Me rt,
  • İ.S.,(2009).Örgütse l ge çe rlik ölçe ğinin
  • uygulaması: Kamuda görgül bir çalışma.
  • Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 42, 117-139.
  • Harris, K.J., Andre ws, M.C. ve Kacmar, M.K. (2007). The mode rating e ffe cts of justice on the re lationship politics and work place attitude . Journal of Business Psychology, 22, 135- 144.
  • Hochwarte r, W.A., Witt, L.A. ve Kacmar, K.M. (1997).Pe rce ptions politics as a mode rator of the re lationship be twe e n conscie ntiousne ss and job pe rformance . Southe rn Manage me nt Association Me e ting, Atlanta, GA.
  • Homans, G.C. (1961 ). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Ne w York: Harcourt, Brace , and World.
  • İşcan, Ö.F. (2005). Siyasal are na me taforu olarak örgütle r ve örgütse l siyase tin örgütse l adale t algısına e tkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 60, 149-171.
  • Jöre skog, K.G. ve Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.8 for
  • Windows [Compute r software ].
  • IL: Scie ntific Software Inte rnational, Inc. Skokie ,
  • Kacmar, K.M. ve Fe rris, G.R. (1991). Pe rce ptions of organizational politic sscale (POPS): De ve lopme nt and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 193-205.
  • Kacmar, K.M. ve D.S. Carlson (1997). Furthe r validation politicsscale (POPS): A multiple sample inve stigation. Journal of Management, 23, 627- 658. pe rce ptions of of organizational politics.
  • Nie hoff, B.P. ve Moorman, R.H. (1993).Justice as a me diator of the re lationship be twe e n me thods of monitoring and organizational citize nship Management Journal, 36, 527-556. Academy of
  • Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior. Le xington, MA: Le xington Books.
  • Organ, D.W. ve Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive ve rsus organizational Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164. be haviour,
  • Özde ve cioğlu, M. (2002). Kamu ve öze l se ctor yöne ticile ri arasındaki davranışsal çalışma koşulları be lirle nme sine yöne lik bir araştırma. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 115-134. farklılıklarının
  • Parke r, C.P., Dipboye , R.L., ve Jackson, S.L. (1995). Pe rce ptions of organizational politics: An inve stigation conse que nce s. Journal of Management , 21, 891–912. and
  • Ram, P. ve Prabhakar, G.V. (2010).Le adership style s and pe rce ive d organizational politics as pre dictors of work re late d outcome s. European Journal of Social Sciences, 15, 40-55.
  • Randall, M.L., Cropanzano, R., Borma n, C.A. ve Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as pre dictors of work attitude s, job pe rformance , and organizational citize nship be havior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159-174.
  • Rose n, C.C., Le vy, P.E. ve Hall, R.J. (2006). Placing pe rce ptions of politics in the conte xt of the fe e dback e nvironment, e mployee attitudes, and job pe rformance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 211-220.
  • Sargut, A.S. (2010). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim. Ankara: İmge Kitabe vi Yayınları.
  • Se rt, M. (2013).Örgütse l adale t, bağlılık ve örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi üze rine bir me ta-analizi. (Yayımlanmamış Yükse k Lisans Te zi). Kara Harp Okulu, Ankara.
  • Songür, N., Basım, H.N. ve Şe şe n, H. (2008). Örgütse l vatandaşlık davranışında adaletin öncüllük rolü. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41, 79- 100.
  • Ye n, W.W., Che n, S.C. ve Ye n, S.I. (2009).The impact of pe rceptions of organizational politics on workplace frie ndship. African Journal of Business Management, 3, 548-554.
  • Tyle r, T.R. ve Lind, E.A. (1992).A relational model of authority in groups. İçinde M.P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (ss. 115–191). 25 San Die go, CA: Acade mic Pre ss.
  • Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitude s, and workout come s: Exploration and implications for the public se ctor. Journal of Vocational Behavior 57, 326 -347. Vigoda-Gadot, E. ve Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational Politics and Job Outcome s: The mode rating e ffe cts of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2829-2861.
  • Williams, L.J. ve Ande rson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction commitme nt organizational citize nship and in-role be haviors, Journal of Management, 17, 601- 617.
  • organizational pre dictors of
There are 50 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA23AT52PR
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Arş. Gör. Özgür Ayhan This is me

Doç. Dr. Sait Gürbüz This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 16 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ayhan, A. G. Ö., & Gürbüz, D. D. S. (2014). Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 16(3), 76-93.
AMA Ayhan AGÖ, Gürbüz DDS. Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü. isguc. September 2014;16(3):76-93.
Chicago Ayhan, Arş. Gör. Özgür, and Doç. Dr. Sait Gürbüz. “Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 16, no. 3 (September 2014): 76-93.
EndNote Ayhan AGÖ, Gürbüz DDS (September 1, 2014) Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 16 3 76–93.
IEEE A. G. Ö. Ayhan and D. D. S. Gürbüz, “Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü”, isguc, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 76–93, 2014.
ISNAD Ayhan, Arş. Gör. Özgür - Gürbüz, Doç. Dr. Sait. “Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 16/3 (September 2014), 76-93.
JAMA Ayhan AGÖ, Gürbüz DDS. Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü. isguc. 2014;16:76–93.
MLA Ayhan, Arş. Gör. Özgür and Doç. Dr. Sait Gürbüz. “Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, vol. 16, no. 3, 2014, pp. 76-93.
Vancouver Ayhan AGÖ, Gürbüz DDS. Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı İle İlişkisinde Adaletin Rolü. isguc. 2014;16(3):76-93.