Kamu Örgütlerinde Girişimcilik

Year 2012, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 151 - 170, 01.12.2012

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ali Osman Öztürk

Abstract

Girişimciliği özel sektör uygulamaları bağlamında inceleyen çalışmalarda girişimcilik sürecini risk alma, inovasyon ve prokativite boyutlarıyla ele alan bir yaklaşım hakimdir. Son otuz yıldır kamu yönetimi literatüründe de yer bulmaya başlamış olan girişimcilik konseptinin özel sektörde gözlenen süreçlerden farklı olması gereği yoğun olarak tartışılmaktadır. Bu anlamda kamu örgütlerini özel sektördekilerden ayıran yapısal, yönetsel ve kültürel niteliklerine uygun olarak gelişen girişimcilik yaklaşımlarına ihtiyaç duyulmakla birlikte, kamu yönetimi literatüründe bu konuda ortak bir perspektife ulaşılmadığı gözlenmektedir. Bu çalışmada kamu hizmeti sunan geleneksel kamu örgütlerinin yapısal, yönetsel ve kültürel karakteristikleri çerçevesinde girişimci aktivitilere ne denli elverişli oldukları risk alma, inovasyon ve proaktivite boyutlarıyla detaylı bir şekilde incelenerek, kamu yönetimi akademisyen ve uyguluyacılarına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülen değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır.

Keywords

Kamu örgütleri, girişimcilik, risk alma, inovasyon, proaktivite

Entrepreneurship in the Public Organizations

Abstract

The studies focused on entrepreneurship process at private sector organizations often make use of an approach including risk taking, innovation, and proactiveness dimensions of entrepreneurship. Emphasizing its different aspects from the private sector practices, entrepreneurship has been the subject of in-depth studies of public administration literature last thirty years. Although there is a need for a unique entrepreneurship approach for public sector organizations based on their structural, managerial, and cultural aspects, it seems that there is no common entrepreneurship perspective developed by public administration scholars. In the light of pertaining literature, this study explores applicability of risk taking, innovation, and proactiveness dimensions of entrepreneurship to the public organizations with their structural, managerial, and cultural characteristics while providing useful assessments to Turkish public management scholars and practitioners.

Keywords

Public organizations, entrepreneurship, risk taking, innovativeness, proactiveness

References

• Ackyord, S., Hughes, J.A. ve Soothill, K. (1989). Public Sector Services and Their Management. Journal of Management Studies, 26:6, ss. 603-619
• Andrew, R., Boyne, G.A. , Law, J. ve Walker, R.,M. (2007). Centralization, Organiza- tional Strategy, and Public Service Per- formance. Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19, ss. 57-80 of Public
• Bahran, G. (2002), Özerk Kurumlar Hak- kında Rapor, T.C. Sayistay Baskanligi Arastirma http://www.sayistay.gov.tr/yayin/ele k/elekicerik/36OzerkKurRap.pdf
• Balfour, D. L. ve Wechsler, B. (1996). “Orga- nizational Commitment: Antecendents and Outcomes in Public Organizati- ons,” Public Productivity and Manage- ment Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, ss. 256-277.
• Bernier, L. ve Hafsi, T. (2007). “The Chan- ging Nature of Public Entrepreneurs- hip.” Public Administration Reivew. Vol. 67, Issue 3, 488-503.
• Borins, S. (1998). Innovating with Integrity: How Local Heroes are Transforming American Government. Georgetown University Press: Washington D.C. .
• Boyett, I. (1997) “The Public Sector Entrep- reneur: A Definition.” International Jo- urnal of Entrepreneurial Beahviour and Reseacrh, Vol. 3 No. 2,ss. 77-92
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and Private Ma- nagement: What's the Difference?. Jour- nal of Management Studies, 39:1, ss. 97-122
• Bozeman, B. ve Kingsley, G. (1998). “Risk Culture in Public and Private Organi- zations.” Public Administration Re- view, Vol. 58, No.2, ss. 109-118
• Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). “Risk culture in public and private organiza- tions.” Public Administration Review, 58, 109-117.
• Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). “Risk Taking Pro- pensity of Entrepreneurs.” Academy of Management Journal. 23 (3): 509-520.
• Burns, T. ve Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Mana- gament of Innovation. London: Tavis- tock Publication.
• Bulut, Ç., Fiş, A.M., Aktan, B., Yılmaz, S. (2008). “Kurumsal Girişimcilik: Kav- ramsal Yapı Üzerine Bir Tartışma.” Jo- urnal of Yaşar University, 3 (10), ss. 1389-1416.
• Crewson, P. (1997). “Public Service Motiva- tion: Building Emprical Evidence of In- cidence and Effect.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 7, ss. 499-518.
• Currie, G., Humphreys, M., Üçbşaran, D., McManus, S. (2008). “Enterpreneurial Leadership in the English Public Sector: Paradox or Possibility?” Public Admi- nistration, Vol. 86, No. 4, ss.987-1008.
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). “Characteristics of innovation and in- novation adoption in public organizati- ons: Assessing the role of managers.” Journal of Public Administration Rese- arch and Theory, 19, 495-522.
• Dennis, J., Langley, A., ve Rouleau, L.( 2005). Rethinking Leadership in Public Orga- nizations. Ed. Ferlie, E., Lynn, L.E., Pol- lit, C., The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press, ss. 446-467.
• Dobell, A.R. (1989). The Public Administra- tor: Good? or Entrepreneur? Or Are They the same in the Public Service. American Review of Public Adminis- tration, Vol. 19, No. 1, ss. 2-11.
• Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and En- trepreneurship: Practice and Principles, Butterworth-Heinemann, London
• Edwards, C., Jones, G., Lawton, A., Lle- wellyn, N.(2002).” Publıc Entreprenurs- hip: Rhetoric, Reality, and Context.” International Journal of Public Admi- nistration, Vol. 25, No. 12, ss. 1539-1554.
• Eggers, W. D., & O’Leary, J. (1995). Revolu- tion at the roots: Making our govern- ment smaller, better, and closer to home. New York, NY: Free Press.
• Ergun, T. ve Polatoğlu, A. (1988). Kamu Yö- netimine Giriş, 3. yayım. Ankara: Tür- kiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitütüsü
• Eryilmaz, B. (2010). Kamu Yonetimi: Dusun- celer, Yapilar, Fonksiyonlar. 3. Baski. Sozkesen Matbaasi: Ankara.
• Espınosa, M. dM. B., Suanes, A.M. (2011). “Corporate Entrepreneurshıp Through Joint Ventura.” International Entrepre- neuship Management, vol. 7, ss. 314- 430.
• Forster, J, Graham P. ve Wanna, J. (1996). “The New Public Entrepreneurialism.” Ed. J. Wanna, J. Forster ve P. Graham. Entrepreneurial Management in the Public Sector. Macmillan: Melbourne.
• Hal, G. R. ve Chun, Y. H. (2005). “Public and Management Private (ss.72-102)” Ed. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn ve Christopher Politt. The Ox- ford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford University Press Inc. : New York. Compared”,
• Hall, R.H. (1996). Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Hill, C.J. ve Lynn, L.E. (2009). Public Mana- gement: A Tree-Dimensional Appro- ach. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
• Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Govern- ment at work: Best practices and model programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Kaboğlu, İ. (1998). Bağımsız İdari Otoriteler. İstanbul: Alkım Yayınevi.
• Keh, H.T., Foo, M.D., Lim, B.C. (2002). “Op- portunity Evaluation under Risky Con- ditipns: The Cognitive Processes of Entrepreneurs.” Entrepreneurship The- ory and Practice, winter, ss. 125-148.
• Kearney, C., Hisrich, R.D., ve Roche F.,( 2009). “Public and Private Sector En- trepreneurship: Similarities, Differences or a Combination?” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 16, No.1, ss. 26-46
• Low, Murray B. (2001). “The Adolescence of Entrepreneurship Research: Specifica- tion of Purpose.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 17-25.
• Lumpkin, G.T. ve Dess, Gregory G. (2001). “Linking Two Dimensions Of Entrepre- neurial Orientation To Firm Perfor- mance: The Moderating Role Of Environment And Industry Life Cyle”. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429- 451.
• Lynn, L. E. (1996). Public Management As Art, Sciences, and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
• Mack, W.R., Green, D., Vedlitz, A. (2008). “Innovation and Implementation in the Public Sector: An Examination of Public Entrepreneurship.” Review of Policy and Research, Volume 25, Number 3, ss. 233-252.
• Martinez, J.M. ve Richardson, W.D., (2008). Administrative Ethics in the Twenty- first Century. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
• Moon, M.J. (1999). “The Pursuit of Manage- rial Entrepreneurship: Does Organiza- tion Matter?” Public Administration Review, Vol. 59, No. 1, ss. 31-43.
• -------------., (2000). “Organizational Com- mittment Revisited in New Public Ma- nagement: Motivation, Organizational Culture, Sector, and Managerial Level.” Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, ss. 177-194.
• Moon, M. J., & deLeon, P. (2001). “Munici- pal reinvention: Managerial values and diffusion among municipalities.” Jour- nal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 327-351.
• Morris, M.H. ve Jones, F.F. (1999). “Entrep- reneurship in Established Organizati- ons: The Case of the Public Sector.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, ss. 71-91.
• Morris, M. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Cor- porate entrepreneurship. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College.
• Osborne, D. ve Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinven- ting Government: How the Entrepre- neurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley: Rea- ding, Massachusetts.
• Ott, J. S. ve Goodman, D. (1998). “Govern- ment Reform or Alternatives to Bure- aucracy? Thickening, Tides, and the Future of Governing.” Public Adminis- tration Review, Vol. 60, Issue: 6, s. 522- 545.
• Pender, M. (2009). “The Meaning of Entrep- reneurship: A Modular Concept.” Jo- urnal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9:77-99
• Perry, J. L. ve Wise, L. R. (1990). “The Moti- vational Bases of Public Service.” Public Administration Review, May/June. ss. 367-373.
• Quince, T. ve Whittaker, H. (2003). “Entrep- reneurial Orientation and Entreprene- urs’ Intentions and Objectives.” ESRC Centre for Business Research, Univer- sity of Cambridge Working Paper No. 271. http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/pdf/wp27 1.pdf 2011:
• Ramamurti, R. (1986). “Public Entreprene- urs: Who They are and How They Ope- rate.” California Management Review, 28, ss. 142-158.
• Romzek, B.S., (2000). “Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an Era of Re- form.” International Review of Admi- nistrative Sciences, 66 (1), ss. 21-44
• Rutherford, M.W., Holt, D.T. ( 2007). “Cor- porate Entrepreneuship: An Emprical Look at the Innovatiness dimension and its antecedents.” Journal of Organiza- tional Change Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, ss. 429-446.
• Schein, E., H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Skelcher, C. (2005). “Public-Private Part- nerships and Hybridity” (ss.347-370) Ed. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn ve Christopher Politt. The Oxford Hand- book of Public Management. Oxford University Press Inc. : New York.
• Stevenson, H. H. ve Jarillo, C. J. (1990). “A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrep- reneurial Management.” Strategic Ma- nagement Journal, Vol. 11, Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship, 17- 27.
• Tompkins, J. (2005). Organization Theory and Public Management. Boston, MA: Wodsworth Cengage Learning.
• Zampetakis, L.A., Moustakis, V.S. (2010). “An Expoloratory Research on the Fac- tors Stimulating Corporate Enterprene- urship in the Greek Public Sector.” International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 31, No. 8, ss.871-887.