İmza ile Kişilik Yapısı Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi: Yöneticiler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Year 2010, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 27 - 40, 01.09.2010

Dr.Kurtuluş Kaymaz Prof.Dr.Necmi Gürsakal Ass.Prof.Dr.Umut Eroğlu

Abstract

İlgili literatür incelendiğinde, imza ile kişilik yapısı arasında doğrudan ilişki olduğunu ortaya koyan araştırmalara rastlama olasılığının çok yüksek olmadığı görülmektedir. Yapılan araştırmaların ortak amacı, imza ile kişilik yapısı arasındaki ilişkiyi güçlendirecek bulgulara ulaşmak ve sözkonusu ilişkiyi net biçimde ifade edebilmek olasa da, mevcut literatür henüz imzanın kişilik özelliklerini yansıttığı tezini doğrulayacak kanıtlar sunamamaktadır. Bu nedenle, konu ile ilgili çalışmalar halen sürdürülmektedir. Bu makale, mevcut literature bilimsel değer katmaya ve imzanın fraktal boyutu (fractal dimension) ile kişilik test sonuçları arasında bir korelasyon olup olmadığını saptamaya çalışmaktadır. Araştırma, günlük iş temposunda imzayı sıklıkla kullanan yöneticiler üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Bulgular, “hiçbir ilişki bulunmamaktadır” ifadesini doğrulamaktadır.

Keywords

İmza analizi, fractal boyut, kişilik özelliği, grafoloji, el yazısı

Analyzing The Relationship Between Signature And Personal Traits: A Research On Managers

Abstract

In related literature, it is not a high possibility to encounter the researchs directly questioning the relation between signature and personality traits. The overall aim of the existing researchs is to strenghten the findings proving the relationship between signature and personality traits and to display this relation clearly. However, the existing literature has not yet been able to present the clear proofs verifying the thesis that the signature reflects personality traits. Because of this, the researchs on this subject has still been continuing. The present article is trying to add a scientific value to the existing literature and determine whether there is a correlation between fractal dimensions of the signatures and the results of personality tests. The study was conducted on the directors who use the signature very often in their daily business operations. The findings supported the statement “there is no relationship”.

Keywords

Signature analysis, fractal dimension, personal traits, graphology, handwriting

References

• Aparicio P., Pérez-Bernal J. L., Galán E., Bello M. A. (2004). “Kaolin fractal di- mension. Comparison with other pro- perties”, Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Research Paper, http://claymin.geoscienceworld.org/c gi/content/full/39/1/75.
• Beech, John R. and Mackintosch, Isla C. (2005), Do Differences In Sex Hormones Affect Handwriting Style? Evidence From Digit Ratio and Sex Role Identity As Determinants Of The Sex Of Handwriting. Personality and Indivi- dual Differences, Vol: 39: 459-468.
• Brewer, Jane F. (1999), Graphology. Com- plementary Therapies In Nursing & Midwifery, Vol: 5: 6-14.
• Boulétreau V., Vincent N., Sabourin R. and Emptoz H. (1998), Handwriting and Signature: One or Two Personality Identifiers?, Pattern Recognition, Vol: 2: 1758-1760.
• Castrej Pita, A. A., Sarmiento Galan, A., Cas- trejon-Pita, J. R. and Castrejon-Garcia, R. (2004), Fractal Dimension in Butterf- lies' Wings, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 1-18.
• Chapran, Joulia. (2006), Biometric writer identification: Feature analysis and clas- sification, International Journal of Pat- tern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 20, No. 4: 483-503
• Chen, Hung-Chun, Cha, Sung-Hyuk, Chee, Yi-Min and Tappert, C. Charles, The Detection of Forged Handwriting Using a Fractal Number Estimate of Wrinkli- ness, Unpublished Manuscript.
• Devlin-Gascard, Lorettann (1997), The Sig- nature As An Access Line To Expres- sive Drawing, Art Education, Vol: 50, No: 2: 39-44.
• Dewey, T. G., and Datta M. M. (1989), De- termination of the fractal dimension of membrane protein aggregates using fluorescence energy transfer, Biophysi- cal Journal, Vol: 56: 415-420.
• Goodenough, F. (1945), Sex differences in judging the sex of handwriting, Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 22: 61-68.
• Hartley, James (1991), Sex Differences in Handwriting: A Comment on Spear, British Educational Research Journal. Vol. 17, No. 2: 141-145.
• Hamid, S. and Loewenthal K.M. (1996), In- ferring gender from handwriting in Urdu and English, Journal of Social Psychology. Vol: 136, No: 6: 778-782.
• Hampson, Sarah E., and Colman, Andrew M. (1995), Individual Differences and Personality, London and New York: Longman Press.
• He, Zhenyu, You, Xinge, Tang, Yuan Yan, Fang and Bın, Du, Jianwei (2006), Handwriting Based Personal Identifica- tion, International Journal Of Pattern Recognition, Vol: 20, No: 2: 209-225.
• Joulia, Chapran (2006), Biometric writer identification: Feature analysis and clas- sification, International Journal of Pat- tern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 20, No. 4: 483-503.
• King, Roy N., and Koehler, Derek J. (2000), Illusory Correlations In Graphological Inference, Journal Of Experimental Psychology, Vol: 6, No: 4: 336-348.
• King, Stephen (1994), Graphology: Writing The Wall, Management Development Review, Vol: 7, No: 5: 26-28.
• Linton, Mohammed, Bryan, Found, and Doug, Rogers (2002), Frequency of Sig- nature Styles in San Diego County, J Fo- rensic Sci., Vol: 47, No: 4: 856-872.
• Marquis, R., Schmittbuhl, M., Mazzella, W.D. and Taroni, F. (2005), Quantifica- tion of the shape of handwritten caha- racters: a step to objective discrimination between writers based on the study of the capital character O, Forensic Science International, Vol: 150: 23-32.
• Mathyer, Jacques (1961), The Expert Exami- nation Of Signatures, The Journal Of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, Vol: 52, No: 1: 122-133.
• Murphy, Kevin, and Davidshofer, Charles (1998), Psychological Testing; Principles and Applications, London: Prentice Hall.
• Naftali, A. (1965), Behavior Factors In Handwriting Identification, The Journal Of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Po- lice Science, Vol: 56, No: 4: 528-539.
• Said, H.E.S., Tan, T.N., and Baker, K.D. (2000), Personal Identification Based On Handwriting, Pattern Recognition, Vol: 33: 149-160.
• Srihari, S., Huang, C., and Srinivasan, H. (2008), On the discriminability of the handwriting of twins, J Forensic Sci., Vol: 53, No: 2: 430-446.
• Super, Donald E. (1992), A Comparison of the Diagnosis of a Graphologist with the Results of Psychological Tests, Jour- nal of Consulting and Clinical Psycho- logy, Vol 60, No: 3: 323-326.
• Tett Robert P., & Palmer Cynthia A. (1997), The Validity of Handwriting Elements in Relation to Self-report Personality Trait Measures, Personnel Individual Differences, Vol 22, No.1: 11-18.
• Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1971), Be- lief in the Law of Small Numbers, Psychological Bulletin, Vol: 76, No: 2: 105-110.
• W. Sun, G. X., P. Gong, and S. Liang (2006), Fractal analysis of remotely sensed ima- ges: A review of methods and applica- tions, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 27, No. 22: 4963–4990.
• Webster A., Melcher (1916), Handwriting, From a Psychopathic Viewpoint, Jour- nal Of The American Institute Of Cri- minal Law And Criminology, Vol: 7, No: 2: 284-287.