BibTex RIS Cite

Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler

Year 2008, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 1 - 26, 01.09.2008

Bülent Sezen Aziz Alper Kurultay

Abstract

Çalışmada çelik konstrüksiyonlu ticari gemilerin tasarımında ve inşasında yalın felsefenin önemi incelenmiştir. Çelik gemi inşası, ürün çeşitliliğinin fazla olduğu proje tipi üretim sektörüdür. Bu sektörün tasarım aşamaları, gemi özelliklerinin müşteri ihtiyaçlarına göre belirlenmesini ve üretim sürecinin bu özelliklere bağlı olarak oluşturulmasını kapsamaktadır. Çalışmada, çelik gemi tasarımında ve inşasında hangi yalın tasarım ilkelerinin daha etkili olduğunun belirlenmesi amaçlamıştır. Bu doğrultuda, maliyetlerin düşürülmesi, israfların azaltılması, işlem zamanlarının kısaltılması için kullanılabilecek uygulamalar tanımlanmıştır. Araştırmada, belirtilen amaçlara ulaşabilmek maksadıyla literatürde sıklıkla rastlanan faktörlerin yanında standartlaşma seviyesi, yerlileştirme çalışmaları gibi faktörler belirlenmiştir. Analiz modeli oluşturulmuş, sonra hipotezler tanımlanmıştır. Araştırma neticesinde Türk Çelik Gemi İnşa Sanayisi’nde Yalın Tasarım ilkelerinin üretime etkisi ve işlem sürelerinin kısaltılması, israfların azaltılması, maliyetlerin düşürülmesi için hangi faktörlerin etkili olabileceği etki ağırlıklarıyla belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar genel olarak literatürde daha önceden yapılan araştırmalara paralellik göstermektedir. Ancak, beklenenin aksine, yerlileştirme çalışmalarının maliyetler, israflar ve üretim sürelerinin azaltılması üzerinde pozitif etkisi olmadığı sonucu elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

Yalın Felsefe Yalın Üretim Yalın Tasarım Çelik Konstrüksiyonlu Gemi İnşası Tasarım Performansı

References

  • Ahlstrom, P. (1998) Sequences in the Implementation of Lean Production. European Management Journal, 16:3, s. 327-334.
  • Brunn, P., & Mefford, R. N. (2004) Lean production and Internet. International Journal of Production Economics 89, s. 247-260.
  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001) An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 31:4, s. 235-246.
  • Crute, V., & Ward, Y., & Brown, S., & Graves, A. (2003) Implementing Lean in aerospace – challenging the assumptions and understanding the challenges. Technovation 23, s. 917-928.
  • De Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational and levels-of-analysis issue. Journal of Operations Management 24:2, s. 99–123.
  • Desjardins, M., & Kucner,B. (2002) Creating the LEAN Shipyard. Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. URL: http://www.nsrp.org/lean/presentations/9b.pdf
  • Hines, P., & Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004) Learning to evolve-a review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24:10, s. 994-1011.
  • Holweg, M. (2007) The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management 25, s. 420-437.
  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2004) To pull or not to pull: what is the question? Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 6:2, s. 133– 148.
  • Kitapçı, H. ve Sezen, B. (2007) The Effects of Participation in Decision Making, Individual Improvement Efforts and Training on the Quality of the Product Design Process. Production Planning and Control 18:1, s.3-8.
  • Krafcik, J. F. (1988) Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review 30:1, s. 41-52.
  • Lamb,T. (2005) Naval Ship Acquisiton Class Notes. Summer Naval Surface Ship Design Program, University of Michigan.
  • Mason-Jones, R., & Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000) Engineering leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 2:1, s. 54.
  • Monden, Y. (1983) The Toyota Production System. Productivity Press, Portland.
  • Morgan, J. M. (2002) High performance product development. Troy Design and Manufacturing
  • Murman, E., Allen, T., Bozdogan, K., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., McManus, H., Nightingale, D., Rebentisch, E., Shields, T., Stahl, F., Walton, M., Warmkessel, J., Weiss, S., Widnall, S. (2002) Lean Enterprise Value—Insights from MIT’s Lean Aerospace Initiative. Palgrave, New York.
  • Narasimhan, R., & Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 24, s. 440-457.
  • National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. (1999) Lean Design Methodology Guide. Oppenheim, W. B. (2004) Lean Product Development Flow, Wiley InterScience.
  • Perez, M. & Sanchez, A. (2000) Lean production and supplier relations: a survey of practices in the Aragonese automative industry. Technovation 20, s. 665-676.
  • Rinehart, J., Huxley, C., & Robertson, D. (1997) Just Another Car Factory? Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • Shah, R. & Ward, P. T. (2003) Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management 21:2, s. 129–149.
  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25:4, s. 785-805.
  • Stoewer, H. (2003) Book review. Space Policy, 19, s. 73-74. Stank, T., Crum, M. & Arango, M. (1999) Benefits of Interfirm Coordination in Food Industry Supply Chains. Journal Business Logistics 20:2, 21-41.
  • Uluköylü, S. (2005) Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ve Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, İşletme Fakültesi.
  • White, R. E., Peraon, J. N., & Wilson, J. R. (1999) JIT Manufacturing: a survey of implementation in small and large US Manufacturers. Management Science, 45:1, s. 1-15.
  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990) The Machine That Changed the World. Harper Perennial, New York.
  • Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (1996) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster, New York.

Year 2008, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 1 - 26, 01.09.2008

Bülent Sezen Aziz Alper Kurultay

Abstract

This research study questions the importance of lean philosophy in steel structured commercial ship design and shipbuilding. Shipbuilding is unique ‘project type’ manufacturing industry which encompasses a lot of product variety. Design phases related to this industry includes specifications which are determined according to the customers’ requirements as well as the manufacturing processes which are based on these requirements. The research aims to determine the lean design principles which primarily affect steel ship design and shipbuilding. With this goal, the study identifies what kind of practices can be used for cost, lead time, and waste reduction. In addition to the widely-used factors in past research, the constructs of “standardization level” and “use of national suppliers” were developed to achieve the research goals. The analysis model was created and the hypotheses were defined. In the findings, the key factors and the effect size of each factor for cost, lead time and waste reduction in conjunction with the effect of lean design principles were determined in the Turkish Steel Shipbuilding Industry. The results agree with the general established conclusions of previous research. However, in contrary to the expectations, “use of national suppliers” was found to have no positive effect on reducing cost, waste and lead time.

Keywords

Lean Philosophy Lean Production Lean Design Steel Structured Ship Building Design Performance

References

  • Ahlstrom, P. (1998) Sequences in the Implementation of Lean Production. European Management Journal, 16:3, s. 327-334.
  • Brunn, P., & Mefford, R. N. (2004) Lean production and Internet. International Journal of Production Economics 89, s. 247-260.
  • Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001) An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 31:4, s. 235-246.
  • Crute, V., & Ward, Y., & Brown, S., & Graves, A. (2003) Implementing Lean in aerospace – challenging the assumptions and understanding the challenges. Technovation 23, s. 917-928.
  • De Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational and levels-of-analysis issue. Journal of Operations Management 24:2, s. 99–123.
  • Desjardins, M., & Kucner,B. (2002) Creating the LEAN Shipyard. Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. URL: http://www.nsrp.org/lean/presentations/9b.pdf
  • Hines, P., & Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004) Learning to evolve-a review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24:10, s. 994-1011.
  • Holweg, M. (2007) The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management 25, s. 420-437.
  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2004) To pull or not to pull: what is the question? Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 6:2, s. 133– 148.
  • Kitapçı, H. ve Sezen, B. (2007) The Effects of Participation in Decision Making, Individual Improvement Efforts and Training on the Quality of the Product Design Process. Production Planning and Control 18:1, s.3-8.
  • Krafcik, J. F. (1988) Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review 30:1, s. 41-52.
  • Lamb,T. (2005) Naval Ship Acquisiton Class Notes. Summer Naval Surface Ship Design Program, University of Michigan.
  • Mason-Jones, R., & Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000) Engineering leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems 2:1, s. 54.
  • Monden, Y. (1983) The Toyota Production System. Productivity Press, Portland.
  • Morgan, J. M. (2002) High performance product development. Troy Design and Manufacturing
  • Murman, E., Allen, T., Bozdogan, K., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., McManus, H., Nightingale, D., Rebentisch, E., Shields, T., Stahl, F., Walton, M., Warmkessel, J., Weiss, S., Widnall, S. (2002) Lean Enterprise Value—Insights from MIT’s Lean Aerospace Initiative. Palgrave, New York.
  • Narasimhan, R., & Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 24, s. 440-457.
  • National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. (1999) Lean Design Methodology Guide. Oppenheim, W. B. (2004) Lean Product Development Flow, Wiley InterScience.
  • Perez, M. & Sanchez, A. (2000) Lean production and supplier relations: a survey of practices in the Aragonese automative industry. Technovation 20, s. 665-676.
  • Rinehart, J., Huxley, C., & Robertson, D. (1997) Just Another Car Factory? Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • Shah, R. & Ward, P. T. (2003) Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management 21:2, s. 129–149.
  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25:4, s. 785-805.
  • Stoewer, H. (2003) Book review. Space Policy, 19, s. 73-74. Stank, T., Crum, M. & Arango, M. (1999) Benefits of Interfirm Coordination in Food Industry Supply Chains. Journal Business Logistics 20:2, 21-41.
  • Uluköylü, S. (2005) Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ve Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, İşletme Fakültesi.
  • White, R. E., Peraon, J. N., & Wilson, J. R. (1999) JIT Manufacturing: a survey of implementation in small and large US Manufacturers. Management Science, 45:1, s. 1-15.
  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990) The Machine That Changed the World. Harper Perennial, New York.
  • Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (1996) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster, New York.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA24FU92CC
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Bülent Sezen This is me

Aziz Alper Kurultay This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2008
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Sezen, B., & Kurultay, A. A. (2008). Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 10(3), 1-26.
AMA Sezen B, Kurultay AA. Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler. isguc. September 2008;10(3):1-26.
Chicago Sezen, Bülent, and Aziz Alper Kurultay. “Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 10, no. 3 (September 2008): 1-26.
EndNote Sezen B, Kurultay AA (September 1, 2008) Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 10 3 1–26.
IEEE B. Sezen and A. A. Kurultay, “Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”, isguc, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2008.
ISNAD Sezen, Bülent - Kurultay, Aziz Alper. “Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 10/3 (September 2008), 1-26.
JAMA Sezen B, Kurultay AA. Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler. isguc. 2008;10:1–26.
MLA Sezen, Bülent and Aziz Alper Kurultay. “Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, vol. 10, no. 3, 2008, pp. 1-26.
Vancouver Sezen B, Kurultay AA. Gemi İnşaatında Tasarım Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler. isguc. 2008;10(3):1-26.