Determinants of Ecological Footprint in Türkiye: Evidence from the Fourier ARDL Bounds Test Approach

Abstract

Ecological footprint calculations evaluate sustainability by examining natural resources. The ecological footprint obtained by calculating the number of natural resources per person provides information about the amount of waste produced as well as the natural resources consumed and examines the sustainability of living conditions in the world in this respect. The ecological footprint is one of the frequently encountered topics in the literature in terms of the analysis of environmental impacts. This study examines the factors influencing the Ecological Footprint in Turkey. Using annual data between 1980 and 2018, the relationship of renewable energy consumption, human capital and urbanization variables to the Ecological Footprint is examined. The Fractional Fourier Augmented Dickey Fuller Unit Root Test and the Fourier Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bound Test is used in the study. There is a statistically significant relationship between the renewable energy, human capital and urbanization variables and the Ecological Footprint. When the outputs obtained in the study are examined, it is seen that the variables affect the ecological footprint. The increased value of these variables can be used to explain why the Ecological Footprint increased. Increasing industrial activities due to globalization and technological developments, increasing vehicle traffic in cities due to population growth, unplanned urbanization and destruction of green areas due to the sheltering needs of the increasing population, inability of recycling facilities to adapt to the increasing population and unplanned waste management, etc. factors can increase the ecological footprint. However, as urbanization increases, if a correct plan is drawn by taking these factors into consideration, the negative correlation between the ecological footprint and urbanization can be explained. Within the determined plan; Wastewater management, protection of green areas, prevention of unplanned urbanization and efficient use of resources are explanatory at this point. The empirical findings have important policy implications. According to these policy implications, to offset the effects on the ecological footprint, educational activities to raise environmental awareness and adopt energy-efficient lifestyles should be given due importance, various incentives and supports should be implemented and a green-based lifestyle.

Keywords

• Fourier ARDL
• Ecological footprint
• Renewable energy consumption

References

1. Ahmed, N., Mahboob, F., Hamid, Z., Sheikh, A.A., Ali, M. S. E., Glabiszewski, W., Wysoki'nska-Senkus. A., Senkus, P., & Cyfert, S. (2022). Nexus between nuclear energy consumption and carbon footprint in Asia Pacific Region: policy toward. Environmental Sustainability. Energies, 15, 6956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196956 google scholar
2. Alper, A. E., Oransay, G., & Alper, F. Ö. (2015). Beşeri sermayenin belirleyicileri: Üst orta gelirli ülkeler grubu ile OECD karşılaştırmalı analizi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(9), 565578. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.514 google scholar
3. Amin, N., Song, H. M., & Shabbir, M. S. (2022). What factors contribute to environmental degradation in G11 economies? Emphasizing the importance of renewable and non-renewable energy sources. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(5), 472482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059720 google scholar
4. Apergis, N., Payne, J. E. (2014). The causal dynamics between renewable energy, real GDP, emissions and oil prices: evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46(36). 4519-4525. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.964834 google scholar
5. Asghar, N., Majeed, M. T., Khan, M. W., Anwar, A. (2023). Biomass energy consumption and sustainable development: empirical evidence from Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (30), 145-160. google scholar
6. Ayompe, L. M., Davis, S. J., & Egoh, B. N. (2020). Trends and drivers of African fossil fuel CO2 emissions 1990-2017. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc64f google scholar
7. Bayraktar, Y., Koc, K., Toprak, M., Ozyılmaz, A., Olgun, M. F., Balsalobre-Lorente, D. & Soylu, Ö. B. (2023). Convergence of per capita ecological footprint among BRICS-T countries: evidence from Fourier unit root test, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (30), 63022-63035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26532-1 google scholar
8. Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x google scholar

9. Boluk, G., & Kaplan, R. (2022). Effectiveness of renewable energy incentives on sustainability: evidence from dynamic panel data analysis for the EU countries and Turkiye. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(18), 26613-26630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17801-y google scholar
10. Bozoklu, S., Yılancı, V., & Görüş, M. S. (2020). Persistence in per capita energy consumption: a fractional integration approach with a fourier function. Energy Economics, (91), 1-12. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104926 google scholar
11. Chen, C. Z., & Lin, Z. S. (2008). Multiple timescale analysis and factor analysis of energy ecological footprint growth in China 1953-2006. Energy Policy, 36(5), 1666-1678. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.033 google scholar
12. Chen, Y., Lee, C.C., & Chen, M. (2022). Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy & Environment, 33(3). 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211008610 google scholar
13. Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, (242), 118537. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537 google scholar
14. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, (74), 427-431. google scholar
15. Global Footprint Network, (2022). Ecological Footprint, Available online: https://www. footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ ecological-footprint/, (accessed on 18 November 2022). google scholar
16. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier and Dickey Fuller Type Unit Root Tests. Economics Letters. (117), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081 google scholar
17. Gan, C., & Voda, M. (2023). Can green finance reduce carbon emission intensity? Mechanism and threshold effect. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (30), 640-653. google scholar
18. Hassan, T., Song, H. M., Khan, Y., & Kırıkkaleli, D. (2022). Energy efficiency a source of low carbon energy sources? Evidence from 16 high-income OECD economies. Energy, (243), 123063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123063 google scholar
19. Hsu, T. K. (2021). The effect of renewable energy on carbon dioxide emission in Taiwan: Quantile mediation analysis. Science Progres, 104(3). https://doi. org/10.1177/00368504211058557 google scholar Islam, M. M., Ali, M. I., Ceh, B., Singh, S., Khan, M. K., & Dagar, V. (2022). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption driven sustainable development in ASEAN countries: do financial development and institutional quality matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (30), 34231-34247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18488-x google scholar
20. Jin, & T., Kim, J. (2018). What is better for mitigating carbon emissions - Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, (91), 464-471. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022 google scholar
21. Jin, W., Gao, S., & Pan, S. (2023). Research on the impact mechanism of environmental regulation on green total factor productivity from the perspective of innovative human capital. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (30), 352-370. google scholar
22. Ludlow, J., & Enders, W. (2000). Estimating non-linear ARMA models using Fourier coefficients. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00048-0 google scholar
23. Mattila, T. (2012). Any sustainable decoupling in the Finnish economy? A comparison of the pathways and sensitivities of GDP and ecological footprint 2002-2005. Ecological Indicators. 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.010 google scholar
24. Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7 google scholar
25. Nathaniel, S. P., Yalçıner, K., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resources Policy, 101924. https://dpoi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.1019 google scholar
26. Our World in Data (2022). Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-renewables. (accessed on 21 November 2022). google scholar
27. Pata, U. K. (2021). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3 google scholar
28. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 google scholar
29. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1995). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling approach to Cointegration Analysis. RePEc. google scholar
30. Rees, W. E. (1990). Revisiting Carrying Capacity: Area-Based Indicators of Sustainability. Population and Environment, 17(3), 195-215. google scholar
31. Sadiq, M., Wen, F. H., Bashir, M. F., & Amin, A. (2022). Does nuclear energy consumption contribute to human development? Modeling the effects of public debt and trade globalization in an OECD heterogeneous panel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.133965 google scholar
32. Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2021). The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi. org/10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3 google scholar
33. Sun, Y., Du, M. N., Wu, L. Y., Li, C.Z., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Evaluating the effects of renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions of China’s provinces: based on spatial Durbin Model. Land, 11(8), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081316 google scholar
34. Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability. (Doctoral Thesis), The University of British Columbia, Canada google scholar
35. Wackernagel, M., Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia. google scholar
36. World Bank, (2022). World development indicators. available online: https://databank. worldbank. org/source/world-development-indicators. (accessed on 19 December 2022). google scholar
37. Yılancı, V., Bozoklu, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Are BRICS countries pollution havens? evidence from a Bootstrap ARDL Bounds Testing approach with w Fourier function. Sustainable Cities and Society, (55), 1-12. google scholar