Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 75 Issue: 2, 549 - 578, 15.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041
https://izlik.org/JA24SS65JZ

Abstract

References

  • Abad, J., Nuño, G., & Thomas, C. (2024). CBDC and The Operational Framework Of Monetary Policy. Bank for International Settlements.google scholar 
  • Alper, K., & Çapacıoğlu, T. (2023). Funding Stability and The Pricing Of Retail Rates: Evidence From Turkish Banking Sector. In Koç University-TÜSIAD Economic Research Forum (ERF) (No. 2309). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/296990 google scholar 
  • Andolfatto, D. (2021). Assessing The Impact Of Central Bank Digital Currency On Private Banks. The Economic Journal, 131:525–540. google scholar 
  • Assenmacher, K., Minesso, M. F., Mehl, A., and Pagliari, M. S. (2024). Managing The Transition To Central Bank Digital Currency. Working paper series - European Central Bank, (2907). google scholar 
  • Auer, R. A. and Böhme, R. (2020). The Technology Of Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. BIS Quarterly Review, pages 85–100. google scholar 
  • Auer, R., & Böhme, R. (2021). Central Bank Digital Currency: The Quest For Minimally Invasive Technology. In BIS Working Papers (No. 948). https://www.bis.org/publ/work948.htm. google scholar 
  • Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2023). Rise of the Central Bank Digital Currencies. International Journal of Central Banking, 19(4), 185–214. google scholar 
  • Aydin, H. I. (2007). Interest Rate Pass-Through In Turkey. In The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper. (No. 07/05). https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/wpaper/0705.html google scholar 
  • Bacchetta, P., & Perazzi, E. (2025). CBDC As Imperfect Substitute To Bank Deposits: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, jmcb.13268. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13268 google scholar 
  • Bank for International Settlements (2021). Central Bank Digital Currencies: Financial Stability Implications. Technical report. google scholar 
  • Barrdear, J., & Kumhof, M. (2022). The Macroeconomics Of Central Bank Digital Currencies. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 142(104148), 104148. google scholar 
  • Bhattarai, S., Davoodalhosseini, M., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Central Bank Digital Currency and Transmission of Monetary Policy. Bank of Canada. https://doi.org/10.34989/swp-2024-27 google scholar 
  • Bindseil, U. (2020). Tiered CBDC and The Financial System. Working Paper Series - European Central Bank, (2351). google scholar 
  • Bidder, R., Jackson, T., & Rottner, M. (2025). CBDC and Banks: Disintermediating Fast and Slow. In BIS Working Papers (No. 1280). https://www.bis.org/publ/work1280.htm google scholar 
  • Brunnermeier, M. K. and Niepelt, D. (2019). On The Equivalence Of Private and Public Money. Journal Of Monetary Economics, 106:27–41. google scholar 
  • Burlon, L., Muñoz, M. A., & Smets, F. (2024). The Optimal Quantity Of CBDC In A Bank-Based Economy. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 16(4), 172–217. google scholar 
  • Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices In A Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal Of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383–398. google scholar 
  • CBRT. (2023). Digital Turkish Lira: First Phase Evaluation Report. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/b2527947-27ca-41d1-8a9b-1c9a8c211682/Digital%2BTurkish%2BLira%2BFirst%2BPhase%2BEvaluation%2BReport.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26CACHEID%3DROOTWORKSPACE-b2527947-27ca-41d1-8a9b-1c9a8c211682-oT0X7fP%23page%3D1.00%26gsr%3D0. google scholar 
  • CBRT. (2025). Electronic Data Delivery System (EVDS). https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/ (accessed September 22, 2025). google scholar 
  • Chapman, J., Chiu, J., Davoodalhosseini, S. M., Jiang, J. H., Rivadeneyra, F., and Zhu, Y. (2023). Central Bank Digital Currencies and Banking: Literature Review and New Questions. Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper, (2023-4). google scholar 
  • Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., Weber, A. (2011). Are Micro and Macro Labour Supply Elasticities Consistent? A Review of Evidence on the Intensive and Extensive Margins. American Economic Review, 101(3), 471–475. google scholar 
  • Čihák, Martin; Demirgüç-Kunt, Aslı; Feyen, Erik; Levine, Ross. 2012. Benchmarking Financial Systems Around The World. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 6175. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12031google scholar 
  • Fernández-Villaverde, J., Rubio-Ramírez, J. F., & Schorfheide, F. (2016). Solution and Estimation Methods For DSGE Models. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (pp. 527–724). Elsevier. google scholar 
  • Guerrón-Quintana, P. A., & Nason, J. M. (2013). Bayesian Estimation Of DSGE Models. In N. Hashimzade & M. A. Thornton (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics (pp. 486–512). Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar 
  • Infante, S., Kim, K., Orlik, A., Silva, A. F., and Tetlow, R. J. (2023). Retail Central Bank Digital Currencies: Implications For Banking and Financial Stability. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series, (2023-072). google scholar 
  • Karagöz, K., & Ergün, S. (2025). Transition Effect From Deposit and Policy Interest Rates To Credit Interest Rates In Türkiye: Detecting Asymmetry. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 32(3), 87–100. google scholar 
  • Keister, T. and Sanches, D. (2023). Should Central Banks Issue Digital Currency? The Review of Economic Studies, 90:404–431. google scholar 
  • Knotek, E. S., II, Verbruggge, R. J., Zaman, S., Garciga, C., & Treanor, C. (2016). Federal Funds Rates Based On Seven Simple Monetary Policy Rules. Economic Commentary, 2016–07, 1–6. google scholar 
  • Kumhof, M., & Noone, C. (2021). Central Bank Digital Currencies — Design Principles For Financial Stability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 553–572.google scholar 
  • Niepelt, D. (2020). Monetary Policy With Reserves and CBDC: Optimality, Equivalence, and Politics. Centre for Economic Policy Research, (DP15457).google scholar 
  • Paul, Pascal, Mauricio Ulate, and Jing Cynthia Wu. 2025. “A Macroeconomic Model of Central Bank Digital Currency.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2024-11. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2024-11 google scholar 
  • Rubbo, E. (2023). Networks, Phillips Curves, and Monetary Policy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 91(4), 1417–1455. google scholar 
  • Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion Versus Policy Rules In Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214. google scholar 
  • World Bank, Bank Deposits to GDP for Turkey [DDOI02TRA156NWDB], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDOI02TRA156NWDB, September 22, 2025. google scholar

Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission

Year 2025, Volume: 75 Issue: 2, 549 - 578, 15.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041
https://izlik.org/JA24SS65JZ

Abstract

This paper compares two retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) architectures—Two-Tier (bank-intermediated) and Direct (retail)—within a small-open-economy New Keynesian DSGE calibrated to Turkey. The model features monopolistic competition in deposits, a CES liquidity aggregator over bank deposits and CBDC, bank loan–deposit spreads, and a Taylor-rule policy rate. We trace impulse responses to four shocks: a banking (intermediation) shock, a liquidity-preference shock, a monetary policy shock, and a productivity shock. Three results emerge. First, the Two-Tier design preserves intermediation: deposit competition improves pass-through but does not trigger destabilizing outflows; loans and output fall modestly in adverse shocks, with limited disinflation. Second, the Direct design amplifies disintermediation under stress: deposit flight to CBDC is faster and larger, spreads widen, bank loans contract more, the output gap is more negative, and disinflation is stronger. These patterns are most pronounced for banking and liquidity shocks (Figures 1–2), present but milder for policy tightening (Figure 3), and small for positive productivity shocks where both designs yield rising real wages and subdued inflation (Figure 4). Overall, our Turkey-calibrated results support a “do-no-harm” Two-Tier CBDC: it delivers better deposit-rate pass-through and payment convenience while maintaining the traditional credit channel and smooth policy transmission, whereas a Direct CBDC would require tight safeguards (caps/tiered rates) to avoid credit crunch dynamics under stress.

References

  • Abad, J., Nuño, G., & Thomas, C. (2024). CBDC and The Operational Framework Of Monetary Policy. Bank for International Settlements.google scholar 
  • Alper, K., & Çapacıoğlu, T. (2023). Funding Stability and The Pricing Of Retail Rates: Evidence From Turkish Banking Sector. In Koç University-TÜSIAD Economic Research Forum (ERF) (No. 2309). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/296990 google scholar 
  • Andolfatto, D. (2021). Assessing The Impact Of Central Bank Digital Currency On Private Banks. The Economic Journal, 131:525–540. google scholar 
  • Assenmacher, K., Minesso, M. F., Mehl, A., and Pagliari, M. S. (2024). Managing The Transition To Central Bank Digital Currency. Working paper series - European Central Bank, (2907). google scholar 
  • Auer, R. A. and Böhme, R. (2020). The Technology Of Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. BIS Quarterly Review, pages 85–100. google scholar 
  • Auer, R., & Böhme, R. (2021). Central Bank Digital Currency: The Quest For Minimally Invasive Technology. In BIS Working Papers (No. 948). https://www.bis.org/publ/work948.htm. google scholar 
  • Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2023). Rise of the Central Bank Digital Currencies. International Journal of Central Banking, 19(4), 185–214. google scholar 
  • Aydin, H. I. (2007). Interest Rate Pass-Through In Turkey. In The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper. (No. 07/05). https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/wpaper/0705.html google scholar 
  • Bacchetta, P., & Perazzi, E. (2025). CBDC As Imperfect Substitute To Bank Deposits: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, jmcb.13268. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13268 google scholar 
  • Bank for International Settlements (2021). Central Bank Digital Currencies: Financial Stability Implications. Technical report. google scholar 
  • Barrdear, J., & Kumhof, M. (2022). The Macroeconomics Of Central Bank Digital Currencies. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 142(104148), 104148. google scholar 
  • Bhattarai, S., Davoodalhosseini, M., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Central Bank Digital Currency and Transmission of Monetary Policy. Bank of Canada. https://doi.org/10.34989/swp-2024-27 google scholar 
  • Bindseil, U. (2020). Tiered CBDC and The Financial System. Working Paper Series - European Central Bank, (2351). google scholar 
  • Bidder, R., Jackson, T., & Rottner, M. (2025). CBDC and Banks: Disintermediating Fast and Slow. In BIS Working Papers (No. 1280). https://www.bis.org/publ/work1280.htm google scholar 
  • Brunnermeier, M. K. and Niepelt, D. (2019). On The Equivalence Of Private and Public Money. Journal Of Monetary Economics, 106:27–41. google scholar 
  • Burlon, L., Muñoz, M. A., & Smets, F. (2024). The Optimal Quantity Of CBDC In A Bank-Based Economy. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 16(4), 172–217. google scholar 
  • Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices In A Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal Of Monetary Economics, 12(3), 383–398. google scholar 
  • CBRT. (2023). Digital Turkish Lira: First Phase Evaluation Report. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/b2527947-27ca-41d1-8a9b-1c9a8c211682/Digital%2BTurkish%2BLira%2BFirst%2BPhase%2BEvaluation%2BReport.pdf%3FMOD%3DAJPERES%26CACHEID%3DROOTWORKSPACE-b2527947-27ca-41d1-8a9b-1c9a8c211682-oT0X7fP%23page%3D1.00%26gsr%3D0. google scholar 
  • CBRT. (2025). Electronic Data Delivery System (EVDS). https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/ (accessed September 22, 2025). google scholar 
  • Chapman, J., Chiu, J., Davoodalhosseini, S. M., Jiang, J. H., Rivadeneyra, F., and Zhu, Y. (2023). Central Bank Digital Currencies and Banking: Literature Review and New Questions. Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper, (2023-4). google scholar 
  • Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., Weber, A. (2011). Are Micro and Macro Labour Supply Elasticities Consistent? A Review of Evidence on the Intensive and Extensive Margins. American Economic Review, 101(3), 471–475. google scholar 
  • Čihák, Martin; Demirgüç-Kunt, Aslı; Feyen, Erik; Levine, Ross. 2012. Benchmarking Financial Systems Around The World. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 6175. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12031google scholar 
  • Fernández-Villaverde, J., Rubio-Ramírez, J. F., & Schorfheide, F. (2016). Solution and Estimation Methods For DSGE Models. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (pp. 527–724). Elsevier. google scholar 
  • Guerrón-Quintana, P. A., & Nason, J. M. (2013). Bayesian Estimation Of DSGE Models. In N. Hashimzade & M. A. Thornton (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics (pp. 486–512). Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar 
  • Infante, S., Kim, K., Orlik, A., Silva, A. F., and Tetlow, R. J. (2023). Retail Central Bank Digital Currencies: Implications For Banking and Financial Stability. Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series, (2023-072). google scholar 
  • Karagöz, K., & Ergün, S. (2025). Transition Effect From Deposit and Policy Interest Rates To Credit Interest Rates In Türkiye: Detecting Asymmetry. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 32(3), 87–100. google scholar 
  • Keister, T. and Sanches, D. (2023). Should Central Banks Issue Digital Currency? The Review of Economic Studies, 90:404–431. google scholar 
  • Knotek, E. S., II, Verbruggge, R. J., Zaman, S., Garciga, C., & Treanor, C. (2016). Federal Funds Rates Based On Seven Simple Monetary Policy Rules. Economic Commentary, 2016–07, 1–6. google scholar 
  • Kumhof, M., & Noone, C. (2021). Central Bank Digital Currencies — Design Principles For Financial Stability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 553–572.google scholar 
  • Niepelt, D. (2020). Monetary Policy With Reserves and CBDC: Optimality, Equivalence, and Politics. Centre for Economic Policy Research, (DP15457).google scholar 
  • Paul, Pascal, Mauricio Ulate, and Jing Cynthia Wu. 2025. “A Macroeconomic Model of Central Bank Digital Currency.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2024-11. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2024-11 google scholar 
  • Rubbo, E. (2023). Networks, Phillips Curves, and Monetary Policy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 91(4), 1417–1455. google scholar 
  • Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion Versus Policy Rules In Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195–214. google scholar 
  • World Bank, Bank Deposits to GDP for Turkey [DDOI02TRA156NWDB], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDOI02TRA156NWDB, September 22, 2025. google scholar
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Economic Theory (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Aytuğ Zekeriya Bolcan 0000-0002-5162-4337

Submission Date September 20, 2025
Acceptance Date December 23, 2025
Publication Date January 15, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041
IZ https://izlik.org/JA24SS65JZ
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 75 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Bolcan, A. Z. (2026). Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 75(2), 549-578. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041
AMA 1.Bolcan AZ. Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2026;75(2):549-578. doi:10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041
Chicago Bolcan, Aytuğ Zekeriya. 2026. “Two-Tier Vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75 (2): 549-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041.
EndNote Bolcan AZ (January 1, 2026) Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75 2 549–578.
IEEE [1]A. Z. Bolcan, “Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 549–578, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041.
ISNAD Bolcan, Aytuğ Zekeriya. “Two-Tier Vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi 75/2 (January 1, 2026): 549-578. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041.
JAMA 1.Bolcan AZ. Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2026;75:549–578.
MLA Bolcan, Aytuğ Zekeriya. “Two-Tier Vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission”. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, vol. 75, no. 2, Jan. 2026, pp. 549-78, doi:10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041.
Vancouver 1.Aytuğ Zekeriya Bolcan. Two-Tier vs. Direct CBDC in Turkey: A DSGE Assessment of Banking Intermediation and Monetary Transmission. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi. 2026 Jan. 1;75(2):549-78. doi:10.26650/ISTJECON2025-1788041